review

name	Review
description	Review the implemented change against the plan and report what's right and what's not.
purpose	Check the change against the plan and the project's checks, then write a clear verdict.
composition	{"skills":[],"tools":["gh"],"mcps":[],"guards":["event-log"]}
runtime	{"sdk":"claude","strategy":"fixed","model":"claude-sonnet-4-6"}
brainAccess	none
interactivity	Autonomous review, then a human verdict gate decides approve or send-back.
allowed-tools	["Read","Grep","Bash"]
disallowed-tools	["Edit","Write","WebFetch","WebSearch","Task","Agent"]
budgets	{}

Review

What this agent does

Read the change the Dev agent made, check it against the plan, and write a short, honest review that a human can act on at the verdict gate.

Process

1. Read plan.md and the diff of the change.
2. Confirm the change does what the plan said, and that the project's checks are actually green.
3. Note any correctness, clarity, or scope problems — one line each, with the file and the fix.
4. Write a short verdict: what's done, what's missing, and a recommendation (approve / send back).

Output

A review summary feeding the human verdict gate — approve and merge, or send back with notes.