- name
- apify-audience-analysis
- compatibility
- opencode
- completeness
- 95
- content-types
- ["guidance","examples","do-dont"]
- description
- Implements intelligent apify audience analysis with multi-factor skill selection, fallback chains, and adherence to the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense
- license
- MIT
- maturity
- stable
- metadata
- {"domain":"agent","output-format":"analysis","related-skills":"agent-confidence-based-selector, agent-task-routing","role":"orchestration","scope":"orchestration","triggers":"apify-audience-analysis, apify audience analysis, how do i apify-audience-analysis, orchestrate apify-audience-analysis, automate apify-audience-analysis, agent apify-audience-analysis","archetypes":["orchestration","strategic"],"anti_triggers":["brainstorming","vague ideation","single-agent monolith"],"response_profile":{"verbosity":"medium","directive_strength":"high","abstraction_level":"tactical"}}
- version
- 1.0.0
# Apify Audience Analysis
Orchestrates intelligent skill selection and execution for apify audience analysis workflows. Applies the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense to guide data naturally through the orchestration pipeline, preventing errors before they occur. Selects optimal skills based on multi-factor scoring including text similarity, historical performance, and system availability.
## TL;DR Checklist
- [ ] Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
- [ ] Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
- [ ] Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
- [ ] Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
- [ ] Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
- [ ] Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
- [ ] Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
- [ ] Update confidence scores after each execution for learning
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Orchestration Flow │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
User Request
↓
┌─────────────────┐
│ Parse Request │
│ & Extract │
│ Features │
└────────┬────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Evaluate Available Skills │
│ │
│ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │
│ │ Skill A │ │ Skill B │ │ Skill C │ │
│ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │
│ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │
│ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │
│ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ └─────────────────┴─────────────────┘ │
│ ↓ │
│ Select Best Skill │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────┐
│ Execute Skill │
└────────┬────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────┐
│ Handle Result │
└────────┬────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Error Handling & Fallback │
│ │
│ Success? ────────► Return Result │
│ │
│ Fail? ────────┐ │
│ ↓ │
│ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ Fallback Chain │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ 1. Retry with adjusted parameters │ │
│ │ 2. Try Alternative Skill (if available) │ │
│ │ 3. Defer to Human Operator (if critical) │ │
│ │ 4. Log & Return Error │ │
│ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
## When to Use
Use this skill when:
- Orchestrating multi-step workflows that require skill delegation
- Implementing adaptive skill routing based on confidence scores
- Building fallback mechanisms for failed skill executions
- Creating intelligent task decomposition and parallel execution
- Designing skill dependency graphs with automatic resolution
- Implementing skill selection with historical performance weighting
- Building agent systems that need to self-organize around tasks
## When NOT to Use
Avoid this skill for:
- Direct task execution without orchestration needs - use individual skills instead
- High-frequency trading scenarios where latency must be minimized - the selection overhead may be prohibitive
- Simple linear workflows without branching or fallback requirements
- Cases where skill metadata is unavailable or unreliable
## Core Workflow
1. **Parse and Analyze Request** - Extract intent, entities, and constraints from user input.
**Checkpoint:** All required parameters must be present and in valid format before proceeding.
2. **Score Available Skills** - Calculate match scores using multi-factor algorithm:
- Text similarity between request and skill triggers
- Historical success rate for similar tasks
- Skill availability and health status
- Required dependencies and their availability
**Checkpoint:** Skip to fallback if no skill scores above threshold.
3. **Select Optimal Skill** - Choose skill with highest score that meets minimum confidence.
**Checkpoint:** Verify skill has not been disabled or deprecated.
4. **Execute with Fallback** - Run skill execution wrapped in retry and fallback logic.
**Checkpoint:** Log all execution attempts for audit trail.
5. **Return or Fallback** - Either return successful result or apply fallback chain:
- Retry with adjusted parameters
- Try alternative skill from `related-skills`
- Defer to human operator for critical tasks
**Checkpoint:** Record outcome with timing and confidence metadata.
## Implementation Patterns
### Pattern 1: Skill Selection Logic
```python
def configure_apify_audience_analysis(
target_demographics: Dict[str, Any],
data_sources: List[str],
min_confidence: float = 0.7
) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""Configure and validate Apify audience analysis parameters.
Applies Law 1 (Early Exit) and Law 2 (Make illegal states unrepresentable)
to ensure only valid audience analysis configurations are submitted.
"""
# Law 1: Early exit on invalid inputs
if not target_demographics or not data_sources:
raise ValueError("Demographics and data sources are required for audience analysis")
# Law 2: Validate and normalize inputs
normalized_sources = [src.lower().strip() for src in data_sources if src]
if not normalized_sources:
raise ValueError("At least one valid data source must be provided")
# Law 3: Return new structure, never mutate inputs
config = {
"actorId": "apify/audience-insights",
"input": {
"demographics": target_demographics,
"data_sources": normalized_sources,
"confidence_threshold": min_confidence,
"output_format": "structured_json"
},
"meta": {
"created_at": datetime.utcnow().isoformat(),
"priority": "high" if min_confidence > 0.85 else "normal"
}
}
# Validate against Apify API schema expectations
_validate_apify_input_schema(config["input"])
return config
```
### Pattern 2: Execution with Fallback
```python
def execute_apify_analysis_with_fallback(
config: Dict[str, Any],
apify_client: Any,
max_retries: int = 2
) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""Execute Apify audience analysis with domain-specific fallback chain.
Implements Law 4 (Fail Fast, Fail Loud) and resilient execution patterns.
"""
actor_run_id = None
last_error = None
for attempt in range(max_retries + 1):
try:
# Launch Apify actor run
run = apify_client.actor(config["actorId"]).call_run(input=config["input"])
actor_run_id = run["id"]
# Wait for completion with timeout
result = apify_client.actor_run(actor_run_id).get()
if result["status"] != "SUCCEEDED":
raise RuntimeError(f"Actor run failed: {result.get('status', 'unknown')}")
# Law 3: Return new data structure
return {
"success": True,
"actor_run_id": actor_run_id,
"audience_segments": result.get("output", {}).get("segments", []),
"confidence_score": result.get("output", {}).get("avg_confidence", 0.0),
"attempts": attempt + 1
}
except RateLimitError:
last_error = "Apify API rate limit exceeded"
if attempt < max_retries:
time.sleep(2 ** attempt) # Exponential backoff
continue
except ActorFailedError as e:
last_error = str(e)
# Law 4: Fail fast on invalid actor state
raise RuntimeError(f"Apify actor failed at attempt {attempt + 1}: {e}") from e
# Fallback chain: Retry exhausted
if actor_run_id:
# Attempt fallback to cached/simplified analysis
return _fallback_to_cached_analysis(config["input"]["demographics"])
raise RuntimeError(f"Audience analysis failed after {max_retries + 1} attempts: {last_error}")
```
### MUST DO
- Always validate skill metadata before selection (Early Exit)
- Implement fallback chain with at least 2 levels (Fallback Skill + Human)
- Log all skill selections with full context for auditability
- Return new data structures instead of mutating inputs (Atomic Predictability)
- Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states
- Update confidence scores after each execution for adaptive routing
- Reference `code-philosophy` (5 Laws of Elegant Defense) in all logic
### MUST NOT DO
- Select skills based on a single factor (e.g., only confidence score)
- Disable fallback mechanisms "temporarily" - this creates fragile systems
- Skip validation of skill dependencies before execution
- Return partial results - either complete success or clear failure
- Use magic numbers for confidence thresholds - make them configurable
- Cache skill selections without considering context changes
## TL;DR Checklist
- [ ] Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
- [ ] Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
- [ ] Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
- [ ] Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
- [ ] Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
- [ ] Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
- [ ] Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
- [ ] Update confidence scores after each execution for learning
## TL;DR for Code Generation
- Use guard clauses - return early on invalid input before doing work
- Return simple types (dict, str, int, bool, list) - avoid complex nested objects
- Cyclomatic complexity < 10 per function - split anything larger
- Handle null/empty cases explicitly at function top (Early Exit)
- Never mutate input parameters - return new dicts/objects
- Fail fast with descriptive errors - don't try to "patch" bad data
- Reference code-philosophy laws in comments for complex logic
- Include timing and confidence metadata in all return values
## Output Template
When applying this skill, produce:
1. **Selected Skills** - List of skill names with confidence scores
2. **Selection Rationale** - Why each skill was chosen (match score, history, availability)
3. **Execution Plan** - Order of execution with dependencies
4. **Fallback Strategy** - Which fallback skills will be tried and in what order
5. **Risk Assessment** - Any potential failure points and their impact
6. **Timing Estimates** - Expected latency including fallback scenarios
---
---
## Constraints
### MUST DO
- Define clear input/output contracts for every step in the orchestration flow with explicit validation
- Implement structured logging at each stage capturing context, inputs, outputs, timing, and errors
- Build in fallback paths: if the primary strategy fails, degrade gracefully to a simpler approach
- Validate all preconditions before starting — do not proceed if required resources or permissions are missing
### MUST NOT DO
- Do not create deep nesting of orchestration steps (>5 levels) — flatten workflows where possible
- Avoid silent failure modes: every step must either succeed, fail explicitly, or escalate to a higher handler
- Never use shared mutable state between parallel workflow branches — communicate via immutable messages only
- Do not hardcode execution order when the dependency graph naturally determines it; derive order from explicit dependencies
## Live References
> Authoritative documentation links for this skill's domain. The model follows markdown links at load time to resolve external references and inline content.
- [Audience Segmentation Methods (Wikipedia)](<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audience_segmentation>)
- [Demographic Data Analysis Best Practices](<https://www.surveymonkey.com/mp/demographic-data/>)
- [Market Research Methodologies Guide](<https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/marketresearch.asp>)
- [Data Privacy (GDPR Overview)](<https://gdpr.eu/what-is-gdpr/>)
- [Sentiment Analysis in Social Media Analytics](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.13749>)
## Related Skills
| Skill | Purpose |
|
GitHub에서 보기