- name
- apify-lead-generation
- compatibility
- opencode
- completeness
- 95
- content-types
- ["guidance","examples","do-dont"]
- description
- Implements intelligent apify lead generation with multi-factor skill selection, fallback chains, and adherence to the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense
- license
- MIT
- maturity
- stable
- metadata
- {"domain":"agent","output-format":"analysis","related-skills":"agent-confidence-based-selector, agent-task-routing","role":"orchestration","scope":"orchestration","triggers":"apify-lead-generation, apify lead generation, how do i apify-lead-generation, orchestrate apify-lead-generation, automate apify-lead-generation, agent apify-lead-generation","archetypes":["orchestration","strategic"],"anti_triggers":["brainstorming","vague ideation","single-agent monolith"],"response_profile":{"verbosity":"medium","directive_strength":"high","abstraction_level":"tactical"}}
- version
- 1.0.0
# Apify Lead Generation
Orchestrates intelligent skill selection and execution for apify lead generation workflows. Applies the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense to guide data naturally through the orchestration pipeline, preventing errors before they occur. Selects optimal skills based on multi-factor scoring including text similarity, historical performance, and system availability.
## TL;DR Checklist
- [ ] Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
- [ ] Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
- [ ] Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
- [ ] Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
- [ ] Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
- [ ] Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
- [ ] Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
- [ ] Update confidence scores after each execution for learning
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Orchestration Flow │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
User Request
↓
┌─────────────────┐
│ Parse Request │
│ & Extract │
│ Features │
└────────┬────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Evaluate Available Skills │
│ │
│ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │
│ │ Skill A │ │ Skill B │ │ Skill C │ │
│ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │
│ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │
│ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │
│ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ └─────────────────┴─────────────────┘ │
│ ↓ │
│ Select Best Skill │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────┐
│ Execute Skill │
└────────┬────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────┐
│ Handle Result │
└────────┬────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Error Handling & Fallback │
│ │
│ Success? ────────► Return Result │
│ │
│ Fail? ────────┐ │
│ ↓ │
│ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ Fallback Chain │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ 1. Retry with adjusted parameters │ │
│ │ 2. Try Alternative Skill (if available) │ │
│ │ 3. Defer to Human Operator (if critical) │ │
│ │ 4. Log & Return Error │ │
│ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
## When to Use
Use this skill when:
- Orchestrating multi-step workflows that require skill delegation
- Implementing adaptive skill routing based on confidence scores
- Building fallback mechanisms for failed skill executions
- Creating intelligent task decomposition and parallel execution
- Designing skill dependency graphs with automatic resolution
- Implementing skill selection with historical performance weighting
- Building agent systems that need to self-organize around tasks
## When NOT to Use
Avoid this skill for:
- Direct task execution without orchestration needs - use individual skills instead
- High-frequency trading scenarios where latency must be minimized - the selection overhead may be prohibitive
- Simple linear workflows without branching or fallback requirements
- Cases where skill metadata is unavailable or unreliable
## Core Workflow
1. **Parse and Analyze Request** - Extract intent, entities, and constraints from user input.
**Checkpoint:** All required parameters must be present and in valid format before proceeding.
2. **Score Available Skills** - Calculate match scores using multi-factor algorithm:
- Text similarity between request and skill triggers
- Historical success rate for similar tasks
- Skill availability and health status
- Required dependencies and their availability
**Checkpoint:** Skip to fallback if no skill scores above threshold.
3. **Select Optimal Skill** - Choose skill with highest score that meets minimum confidence.
**Checkpoint:** Verify skill has not been disabled or deprecated.
4. **Execute with Fallback** - Run skill execution wrapped in retry and fallback logic.
**Checkpoint:** Log all execution attempts for audit trail.
5. **Return or Fallback** - Either return successful result or apply fallback chain:
- Retry with adjusted parameters
- Try alternative skill from `related-skills`
- Defer to human operator for critical tasks
**Checkpoint:** Record outcome with timing and confidence metadata.
## Implementation Patterns
### Pattern 1: Skill Selection Logic
```python
def configure_apify_lead_run(
target_industry: str,
location: str,
max_leads: int,
apify_api_token: str
) -> Dict:
"""Configure an Apify Actor run for lead generation with domain-specific validation.
Maps user intent to Apify Actor parameters and validates against
known lead generation constraints (Law 2: Make Illegal States Unrepresentable).
"""
# Guard clause - Early Exit (Law 1)
if not target_industry or not location:
raise ValueError("Industry and location are required for lead targeting")
if max_leads <= 0 or max_leads > 5000:
raise ValueError("Max leads must be between 1 and 5000")
# Domain-specific parameter mapping for Apify Web Scraper
actor_inputs = {
"keywords": [f"{target_industry} companies in {location}"],
"maxItems": max_leads,
"useGoogleMaps": True,
"outputFormat": "json",
"fields": ["name", "website", "email", "phone", "address"]
}
# Validate against Apify Actor schema constraints
if not _validate_apify_actor_inputs(actor_inputs):
raise ValueError("Invalid actor configuration for lead generation")
# Atomic Predictability (Law 3) - Return new dict, don't mutate
run_config = {
"actor_id": "apify/website-content-scraper",
"input": actor_inputs,
"token": apify_api_token,
"timeoutSecs": 3600,
"memoryMbytes": 4096
}
return run_config
```
### Pattern 2: Execution with Fallback
```python
def execute_apify_run_with_fallback(
run_config: Dict,
fallback_data_source: str = "local_cache"
) -> Dict:
"""Execute Apify lead generation run with domain-specific retry and fallback logic.
Implements Fail Fast, Fail Loud (Law 4) for API errors and rate limits.
Fallback chain: 1. Retry with exponential backoff 2. Switch to alternative actor 3. Load from cache
"""
import time
from apify_client import ApifyClient
client = ApifyClient(run_config["token"])
actor = client.actor(run_config["actor_id"])
for attempt in range(3):
try:
# Start run and poll for completion
run = actor.run(run_config["input"])
run_id = run["id"]
# Wait for actor to finish (Law 2: Trusted state)
result = client.run_get_dataset_items(run_id)
if not result:
raise ValueError("Apify run completed but returned zero leads")
# Process and validate lead data
validated_leads = _validate_lead_schema(result)
return {
"success": True,
"leads_count": len(validated_leads),
"data": validated_leads,
"source": "apify_live"
}
except Exception as e:
# Transient API/Rate limit error - retry with backoff
if attempt < 2:
time.sleep(2 ** attempt)
continue
# All retries exhausted - Fail Loud (Law 4)
return _apply_lead_fallback(fallback_data_source, run_config)
```
### MUST DO
- Always validate skill metadata before selection (Early Exit)
- Implement fallback chain with at least 2 levels (Fallback Skill + Human)
- Log all skill selections with full context for auditability
- Return new data structures instead of mutating inputs (Atomic Predictability)
- Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states
- Update confidence scores after each execution for adaptive routing
- Reference `code-philosophy` (5 Laws of Elegant Defense) in all logic
### MUST NOT DO
- Select skills based on a single factor (e.g., only confidence score)
- Disable fallback mechanisms "temporarily" - this creates fragile systems
- Skip validation of skill dependencies before execution
- Return partial results - either complete success or clear failure
- Use magic numbers for confidence thresholds - make them configurable
- Cache skill selections without considering context changes
## TL;DR Checklist
- [ ] Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
- [ ] Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
- [ ] Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
- [ ] Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
- [ ] Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
- [ ] Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
- [ ] Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
- [ ] Update confidence scores after each execution for learning
## TL;DR for Code Generation
- Use guard clauses - return early on invalid input before doing work
- Return simple types (dict, str, int, bool, list) - avoid complex nested objects
- Cyclomatic complexity < 10 per function - split anything larger
- Handle null/empty cases explicitly at function top (Early Exit)
- Never mutate input parameters - return new dicts/objects
- Fail fast with descriptive errors - don't try to "patch" bad data
- Reference code-philosophy laws in comments for complex logic
- Include timing and confidence metadata in all return values
## Output Template
When applying this skill, produce:
1. **Selected Skills** - List of skill names with confidence scores
2. **Selection Rationale** - Why each skill was chosen (match score, history, availability)
3. **Execution Plan** - Order of execution with dependencies
4. **Fallback Strategy** - Which fallback skills will be tried and in what order
5. **Risk Assessment** - Any potential failure points and their impact
6. **Timing Estimates** - Expected latency including fallback scenarios
---
---
## Constraints
### MUST DO
- Define clear input/output contracts for every step in the orchestration flow with explicit validation
- Implement structured logging at each stage capturing context, inputs, outputs, timing, and errors
- Build in fallback paths: if the primary strategy fails, degrade gracefully to a simpler approach
- Validate all preconditions before starting — do not proceed if required resources or permissions are missing
### MUST NOT DO
- Do not create deep nesting of orchestration steps (>5 levels) — flatten workflows where possible
- Avoid silent failure modes: every step must either succeed, fail explicitly, or escalate to a higher handler
- Never use shared mutable state between parallel workflow branches — communicate via immutable messages only
- Do not hardcode execution order when the dependency graph naturally determines it; derive order from explicit dependencies
## Live References
> Authoritative documentation links for this skill's domain. The model follows markdown links at load time to resolve external references and inline content.
- [Lead Generation Best Practices (HubSpot)](<https://www.hubspot.com/marketing-statistics>)
- [CRM Integration Patterns (Salesforce)](<https://developer.salesforce.com/docs/atlas.en-us.api_rest.meta/api_rest/>)
- [Data Enrichment Methods Overview](<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_enrichment>)
- [B2B Lead Data Sources (ZoomInfo)](<https://www.zoominfo.com/company/blog/b2b-lead-generation-guide>)
- [GDPR Compliance for Lead Generation](<https://gdpr.eu/business/what-is-gdpr-compliance/>)
## Related Skills
| Skill | Purpose |
|
GitHub에서 보기