Skip to main content

debug-loop

Use when debugging a failing test or runtime error with hypothesis-driven investigation, autonomous command validation, and systematic root cause elimination.

소스 정보

저장소
proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe
최근 소스 활동
2026년 3월 18일 15:23
감지된 SKILL.md 언어
영어
스타
494
포크
98

설치 방법

기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.

소스 파일 검토

설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.

SKILL.md 표시 중

SKILL.md
소스 지침 · 읽기 전용 미리보기
name
debug-loop
description
Use when debugging a failing test or runtime error with hypothesis-driven investigation, autonomous command validation, and systematic root cause elimination.
trust_tier
0
domain
debugging
# Debug Loop Autonomous hypothesis-driven debugging against real data. No guessing, no simulating. ## Arguments - `<symptom>` — Description of the bug or unexpected behavior. If omitted, prompt the user. ## Phases ### Phase 1 — Reproduce Run the exact command that shows the bug. Capture and display the REAL output. Confirm the bug is visible. If the bug cannot be reproduced, stop and explain what was tried. ### Phase 2 — Hypothesize and Test (up to 5 iterations) For each iteration: 1. State a specific hypothesis (e.g., "the query targets v2 tables but data is in v3 tables") 2. Run a REAL command to test it (e.g., `sqlite3 [db path] '.tables'` then `SELECT COUNT(*) FROM [table]`) 3. Record whether the hypothesis was confirmed or rejected 4. If rejected, form the next hypothesis based on what you learned **Do NOT make code changes until you have a confirmed root cause.** Important checks: - Always check both v2 and v3 SQLite tables when data issues are suspected - Check dependency versions (e.g., sqlite3 vs better-sqlite3) - Check for hardcoded values that may have been missed ### Phase 3 — Fix Make the minimal targeted fix. Explain: - What the root cause was - What you're changing and why - What the blast radius is (which other code paths are affected) Before applying, grep for ALL instances of the problematic pattern across the entire codebase. ### Phase 4 — Verify Run the SAME reproduction command from Phase 1. The output must now show correct values. If it doesn't, go back to Phase 2. Show before/after output comparison. ### Phase 5 — Regression ```bash npm test ``` Run the full test suite. If tests fail, fix them before committing. ## Rules - NEVER guess or simulate output — always run real commands - NEVER make code changes before confirming root cause - Always check for the pattern across the entire codebase, not just one file - If blocked after 5 hypotheses, stop and ask the user for guidance
GitHub에서 보기