Skip to main content

improve-a-conversion-funnel

Diagnose an ethical signup, purchase, application, or activation funnel and test one evidence-backed reduction in user friction. Use when people enter a web journey but fail to complete it, conversion rates fall, or a team wants growth without dark patterns or unsupported redesign.

소스 정보

저장소
protosphinx/sphinxstack
최근 소스 활동
2026년 7월 29일 13:55
감지된 SKILL.md 언어
영어
스타
3
포크
0

설치 방법

기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.

소스 파일 검토

설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.

파일 탐색기
2 개 파일

SKILL.md 표시 중

SKILL.md
소스 지침 · 읽기 전용 미리보기
name
improve-a-conversion-funnel
category
web
description
Diagnose an ethical signup, purchase, application, or activation funnel and test one evidence-backed reduction in user friction. Use when people enter a web journey but fail to complete it, conversion rates fall, or a team wants growth without dark patterns or unsupported redesign.
# improve-a-conversion-funnel Improve the user's ability to reach a wanted outcome. Start with journey evidence, locate one material barrier, and test a reversible repair while protecting quality and consent. ## Inputs - Name the audience, desired user outcome, funnel steps, business outcome, and decision owner. - Gather event definitions, counts, recordings or feedback where permitted, support cases, and recent changes. - Define guardrails for errors, refunds, complaints, accessibility, privacy, and downstream quality. ## Procedure 1. Verify the funnel events and eligible population by reconciling a sample from source records. 2. Calculate step conversion, absolute drop-off, time to advance, error rate, and meaningful segments. 3. Walk the journey on representative devices and states, including new, returning, error, and assisted users. 4. Combine quantitative drop-off with direct evidence from support, usability sessions, or user feedback. 5. List plausible barriers: unclear value, missing trust, unnecessary fields, surprise cost, technical error, slow load, inaccessible control, or wrong audience. 6. Rank barriers by impact, confidence, and effort. Select one with evidence and an owned repair. 7. Define the change, primary outcome, guardrails, minimum meaningful effect, audience, duration, and stop rule before launch. 8. Implement the smallest reversible change and verify events plus critical journey behavior. 9. Run the comparison using an appropriate controlled test or cautious before/after analysis with limitations stated. 10. Inspect guardrails, segments, downstream quality, and support effects before expanding. 11. Record the decision and update the funnel model with what was learned. ## Boundaries Do not hide price, force consent, manufacture urgency, obstruct cancellation, or optimize accidental clicks. Never treat more completion as success when refunds, harm, low-quality leads, or unwanted enrollment rise. Protect small and sensitive segments. ## Done - A reconciled funnel report identifies the highest-impact step and evidence for the selected barrier - The change has a pre-written outcome, guardrails, audience, duration, and stop or rollback rule - Instrumentation and critical journey checks pass before exposure - A decision report shows outcome, uncertainty, guardrails, segments, downstream quality, and next action Then use analyze-an-experiment for controlled results or accessibility-pass when interaction barriers dominate.
GitHub에서 보기