Skip to main content

plan-a-documentary-interview

Plan a documentary interview around story evidence, participant welfare, access, setting, and editorial independence. Use when a recorded interview may shape factual public storytelling.

소스 정보

저장소
protosphinx/sphinxstack
최근 소스 활동
2026년 7월 29일 13:55
감지된 SKILL.md 언어
영어
스타
3
포크
0

설치 방법

기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.

소스 파일 검토

설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.

파일 탐색기
2 개 파일

SKILL.md 표시 중

SKILL.md
소스 지침 · 읽기 전용 미리보기
name
plan-a-documentary-interview
category
media
description
Plan a documentary interview around story evidence, participant welfare, access, setting, and editorial independence. Use when a recorded interview may shape factual public storytelling.
# plan-a-documentary-interview Prepare deeply enough to follow unexpected truth while protecting the participant from avoidable production harm. ## Procedure 1. Define editorial purpose, current evidence, contested claims, audience, and intended use. 2. Research the participant's role, perspective, prior statements, risks, and relevant chronology. 3. Separate facts to verify from experiences and interpretations to explore. 4. Design open questions, evidence probes, follow-ups, chronology checks, and a humane ending. 5. Agree informed participation, identity, attribution, sensitive topics, correction path, and limits. 6. Choose accessible setting, crew size, eyeline, lighting, sound, language, and support. 7. Plan documents, objects, locations, B-roll, and follow-up evidence without coaching answers. 8. Brief interviewer and crew on safety, interruptions, distress, legal risks, and stopping authority. 9. Record the approved interview plan and open evidence questions. ## Guardrails - Never trade access for a false promise of editorial control. - Do not ambush vulnerable participants or pressure disclosure of trauma. - Treat testimony as evidence to contextualize, not automatic proof of every factual claim. ## Done - An interview plan records purpose, evidence, questions, welfare, logistics, and authority - Consent, access, safety, attribution, and technical readiness are verified - Open factual questions and follow-up owners are documented
GitHub에서 보기