Skip to main content

afrexai-construction-estimator

Complete construction estimating and cost management system. Use when preparing project estimates, bid proposals, cost breakdowns, value engineering, change order management, or construction budget tracking. Covers residential, commercial, and infrastructure projects. Trigger on 'estimate', 'construction cost', 'bid', 'takeoff', 'cost breakdown', 'change order', 'value engineering', 'construction budget', 'unit pricing', 'RSMeans'.

설치로 이동

소스 정보

저장소
RabbitAI-Lab/rabbit-plugins-upstream
최근 소스 활동
2026년 7월 26일 20:50
감지된 SKILL.md 언어
영어
스타
0
포크
0

설치 방법

기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.

소스 파일 검토

설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.

파일 탐색기
5 개 파일

SKILL.md 표시 중

SKILL.md
소스 지침 · 읽기 전용 미리보기
name
afrexai-construction-estimator
description
Complete construction estimating and cost management system. Use when preparing project estimates, bid proposals, cost breakdowns, value engineering, change order management, or construction budget tracking. Covers residential, commercial, and infrastructure projects. Trigger on 'estimate', 'construction cost', 'bid', 'takeoff', 'cost breakdown', 'change order', 'value engineering', 'construction budget', 'unit pricing', 'RSMeans'.
# Construction Estimator Pro > Complete construction estimating methodology — from quantity takeoff to bid submission. Zero dependencies. --- ## Phase 1: Project Classification & Estimate Type ### Estimate Type Decision Matrix | Project Stage | Estimate Type | Accuracy | Basis | Use Case | |---|---|---|---|---| | Concept | Order of Magnitude | -30% to +50% | SF/unit costs | Go/no-go decisions | | Schematic | Conceptual/Budget | -15% to +30% | Assembly costs | Budget approval | | Design Dev | Detailed | -10% to +15% | Quantity takeoff | GMP/bid preparation | | Construction Docs | Definitive/Bid | -5% to +10% | Full QTO + subs | Lump sum bid | | Construction | Control | Actual costs | Committed + forecast | Cost management | ### Project Brief YAML ```yaml project: name: "" number: "" type: residential | commercial | industrial | infrastructure | renovation delivery: design-bid-build | design-build | CM-at-risk | IPD location: city: "" state: "" zip: "" location_factor: 1.00 # RSMeans city cost index / national average owner: "" architect: "" scope: gross_sf: 0 stories: 0 site_acres: 0 description: "" schedule: bid_date: "" construction_start: "" substantial_completion: "" duration_months: 0 estimate: type: order-of-magnitude | conceptual | detailed | definitive base_date: "" # Date costs are based on escalation_rate: 0.04 # Annual construction cost escalation assumptions: - "" exclusions: - "" allowances: - item: "" amount: 0 ``` ### Project Type Quick Reference | Type | Key Considerations | Typical $/SF Range (2024-2026) | |---|---|---| | Single Family Residential | Foundation type, finishes grade, energy code | $150-$400/SF | | Multi-Family | Unit mix, parking ratio, amenities | $200-$450/SF | | Office (Class A) | Curtain wall, MEP density, TI allowance | $250-$550/SF | | Retail | Shell vs TI, storefront, grease traps | $150-$350/SF | | Healthcare/Hospital | Life safety, med gas, shielding | $400-$900/SF | | K-12 Education | Prevailing wage, hazmat, phasing | $300-$600/SF | | Warehouse/Distribution | Clear height, slab flatness, dock count | $80-$180/SF | | Hotel | Star rating drives finish, FF&E budget | $200-$500/SF | | Infrastructure (road/mile) | Soil conditions, utilities, traffic control | $2M-$10M/mile | --- ## Phase 2: Quantity Takeoff (QTO) ### CSI MasterFormat Division Structure Use CSI MasterFormat 2018 for ALL estimates. Every line item maps to a division. | Division | Name | Typical % of Total | |---|---|---| | 01 | General Requirements | 8-12% | | 02 | Existing Conditions | 1-5% | | 03 | Concrete | 8-15% | | 04 | Masonry | 2-6% | | 05 | Metals (Structural Steel) | 8-15% | | 06 | Wood, Plastics, Composites | 3-8% | | 07 | Thermal & Moisture Protection | 4-8% | | 08 | Openings (Doors/Windows) | 3-7% | | 09 | Finishes | 8-15% | | 10 | Specialties | 1-3% | | 11 | Equipment | 1-5% | | 12 | Furnishings | 1-5% | | 13 | Special Construction | 0-3% | | 14 | Conveying Equipment (Elevators) | 1-4% | | 21 | Fire Suppression | 2-4% | | 22 | Plumbing | 4-8% | | 23 | HVAC | 8-15% | | 26 | Electrical | 8-15% | | 27 | Communications | 1-3% | | 28 | Electronic Safety & Security | 1-3% | | 31 | Earthwork | 3-8% | | 32 | Exterior Improvements | 2-6% | | 33 | Utilities | 2-5% | ### QTO Best Practices 1. **Measure twice, price once** — QTO errors cascade through the entire estimate 2. **Use consistent units** — SF for areas, LF for linear, CY for volume, EA for items 3. **Add waste factors by material:** - Concrete: 5-8% - Masonry: 3-5% - Drywall: 10-12% - Roofing: 8-10% - Flooring (tile): 10-15% - Lumber: 8-10% - Rebar: 5-7% - Paint: 10-15% 4. **Document measurement methodology** — so anyone can verify 5. **Cross-check totals** — SF of drywall ≈ 2.5-3x floor area (both sides of walls + ceilings) ### QTO Line Item Template ```yaml line_item: division: "03" spec_section: "03 30 00" description: "Cast-in-Place Concrete - Elevated Slabs" quantity: 450 unit: CY unit_cost: labor: 85.00 material: 165.00 equipment: 25.00 subcontractor: 0.00 total_unit_cost: 275.00 extended_cost: 123750.00 waste_factor: 0.07 adjusted_quantity: 481.5 notes: "4500 PSI, #5 rebar @ 12\" OC EW, 6\" slab" source: "Sub quote - ABC Concrete (02/15/2026)" confidence: high | medium | low ``` ### Quantity Verification Cross-Checks | Check | Formula | Flag If | |---|---|---| | Concrete per SF | Total CY ÷ Building SF | >0.15 CY/SF (unless heavy structure) | | Steel per SF | Total tons ÷ Building SF | >15 PSF (unless high-rise) | | Drywall SF | Total drywall SF ÷ Floor SF | <2.0 or >4.0 ratio | | Electrical per SF | Electrical $ ÷ Building SF | >$35/SF (standard office) | | Plumbing fixtures | Count vs occupancy | Missing fixtures for code compliance | | Parking spaces | Per local code requirements | Below minimum ratio | --- ## Phase 3: Pricing & Cost Assembly ### Unit Cost Development **Cost source hierarchy (most reliable first):** 1. **Subcontractor quotes** (3 minimum per trade) — best for bid estimates 2. **Historical project data** — adjusted for location, time, scope 3. **RSMeans/Gordian data** — industry standard reference 4. **Vendor quotes** — for specific materials/equipment 5. **Published cost guides** — Marshall & Swift, Craftsman ### Labor Cost Build-Up ```yaml labor_rate_build_up: trade: "Carpenter" base_wage: 42.50 fringe_benefits: 18.75 # Health, pension, vacation, training payroll_taxes: 8.90 # FICA, FUTA, SUTA, workers comp total_burden: 27.65 burdened_rate: 70.15 productivity_factors: weather: 1.00 # 1.0 = normal, 1.15 = winter overtime: 1.00 # 1.0 = straight time, 1.5 = OT height: 1.00 # 1.0 = ground, 1.10 = >30ft congestion: 1.00 # 1.0 = open, 1.15 = tight shift: 1.00 # 1.0 = day, 1.10 = swing, 1.15 = night adjusted_rate: 70.15 ``` ### Subcontractor Quote Evaluation Score each sub quote (use minimum 3 per trade): | Factor | Weight | 1-5 Score | |---|---|---| | Price competitiveness | 30% | | | Scope completeness (covers all spec sections?) | 25% | | | Qualifications/exclusions (red flags?) | 20% | | | Past performance/reputation | 15% | | | Bond capacity/insurance | 10% | | | **Weighted Total** | 100% | | **Red flags in sub quotes:** - "As needed" or "TBD" line items (scope gap) - Short validity period (<30 days) - Unusual exclusions (e.g., electrician excluding wire) - No reference to spec sections - Price significantly below others (they missed something) ### Crew Rate Assembly ``` Crew Daily Cost = Σ(Workers × Daily Rate) + Equipment Daily Cost Crew Daily Output = Units per 8-hour day (from labor standards) Unit Cost = Crew Daily Cost ÷ Crew Daily Output ``` **Example — Concrete Placement Crew:** - 1 Foreman @ $75/hr × 8 = $600 - 4 Laborers @ $55/hr × 8 = $1,760 - 1 Vibrator operator @ $60/hr × 8 = $480 - Concrete pump (daily rental) = $1,200 - **Crew Daily Cost = $4,040** - Daily output: 50 CY - **Unit Labor+Equipment Cost = $80.80/CY** - Material (concrete delivered) = $165/CY - **Total in-place cost = $245.80/CY** --- ## Phase 4: Indirect Costs & Markups ### General Conditions (Division 01) Checklist | Item | Duration-Based? | Typical Range | |---|---|---| | Project Manager | Yes | $12K-$18K/month | | Superintendent | Yes | $10K-$16K/month | | Project Engineer | Yes | $8K-$12K/month | | Field Office (trailer) | Yes | $1K-$3K/month | | Temporary utilities | Yes | $2K-$5K/month | | Temporary toilets | Yes | $200-$500/month each | | Dumpsters/waste removal | Yes | $1K-$4K/month | | Safety equipment/supplies | Yes | $500-$2K/month | | Small tools & consumables | Lump | 1-2% of labor | | Final cleaning | Lump | $0.15-$0.50/SF | | Permits (building) | Lump | Varies by jurisdiction | | Insurance (Builder's Risk) | Lump | 0.5-1.5% of cost | | Performance/Payment Bond | Lump | 1-3% of contract | | Testing & inspection | Lump | 0.5-1.5% of cost | | As-built documentation | Lump | $5K-$25K | | Commissioning support | Lump | $10K-$50K | **Rule of thumb:** General conditions = 8-15% of direct costs (lower for large projects, higher for small/complex). ### Markup Stack ```yaml markup_calculation: direct_costs: 2500000 general_conditions: percentage: 0.10 amount: 250000 subtotal_1: 2750000 overhead: percentage: 0.05 # Home office overhead amount: 137500 subtotal_2: 2887500 profit: percentage: 0.05 # Varies by market/risk amount: 144375 subtotal_3: 3031875 contingency: design_contingency: 0.05 # For incomplete drawings construction_contingency: 0.03 # For unforeseen conditions amount: 242550 bond: percentage: 0.015 amount: 49118 escalation: rate: 0.04 # Annual months_to_midpoint: 8 amount: 88536 total_estimate: 3412079 cost_per_sf: 341.21 # For 10,000 SF building ``` ### Contingency Guide | Estimate Type | Design Contingency | Construction Contingency | |---|---|---| | Order of Magnitude | 15-25% | 10-15% | | Conceptual | 10-15% | 5-10% | | Detailed | 3-8% | 3-5% | | Definitive/Bid | 0-3% | 2-3% | **Contingency is NOT profit padding.** Track and justify every contingency draw. --- ## Phase 5: Bid Preparation & Strategy ### Bid/No-Bid Decision Scorecard Score 1-5 for each (minimum 30 to bid): | Factor | Weight | Score | |---|---|---| | Project type experience | 3x | | | Client relationship/history | 2x | | | Current workload capacity | 3x | | | Geographic fit | 2x | | | Profit potential | 3x | | | Competition level (fewer = better) | 2x | | | Risk profile (lower = better) | 3x | | | Schedule feasibility | 2x | | | Bonding capacity available | 2x | | | **Weighted Total** | /110 | | ### Bid Day Checklist **48 hours before:** - [ ] All sub quotes received (minimum 3 per trade) - [ ] All material quotes current (check expiration dates) - [ ] Addenda reviewed and incorporated (ALL of them) - [ ] Scope gaps identified and plugged - [ ] Math verified (independent check) **Day of bid:** - [ ] Final sub quotes plugged in - [ ] Markup/profit decision finalized - [ ] Alternates priced if required - [ ] Unit prices calculated if required - [ ] Bid bond secured - [ ] Bid form completed correctly (every blank filled) - [ ] Acknowledge ALL addenda on bid form - [ ] Authorized signature - [ ] Delivered before deadline (allow 1+ hour buffer) ### Competitive Bid Strategy **Market conditions affect markup:** - Hot market (lots of work): Markup 8-12% (O&P combined) - Normal market: Markup 6-10% - Slow market: Markup 3-6% - Must-win/strategic: Markup 2-4% (minimum to cover overhead) **Bid spread analysis** (track your results): ``` Bid Spread = (Your Bid - Low Bid) ÷ Low Bid × 100 ``` - Consistently >10% high → Your costs are inflated or productivity assumptions too conservative - Consistently <2% from low → You might be leaving money on the table - Target: Within 3-5% of winning bid --- ## Phase 6: Value Engineering (VE) ### VE Opportunity Matrix | System | VE Opportunity | Typical Savings | Risk Level | |---|---|---|---| | Structural | Steel vs concrete frame | 5-15% of structure | Medium | | Foundations | Spread vs mat vs piles | 10-30% of foundation | High (geotech dependent) | | Envelope | Curtain wall vs storefront | 15-30% of facade | Low-Medium | | Roofing | TPO vs modified bitumen | 10-20% of roofing | Low | | Mechanical | VAV vs VRF | 10-25% of HVAC | Medium |
GitHub에서 보기
이 SKILL.md는 매우 커서 SkillsMP가 여기에는 첫 섹션만 미리 보여줍니다. GitHub에서 보기