소스 정보
- 저장소
- ranbot-ai/awesome-skills
- 최근 소스 활동
- 2026년 4월 14일 08:03
- 감지된 SKILL.md 언어
- 영어
- 스타
- 6
- 포크
- 4
설치 방법
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
소스 파일 검토
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
메뉴
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
직접 명령은 검토 Prompt를 거치지 않습니다. 실행하기 전에 소스를 확인하세요.
npx skills add https://github.com/ranbot-ai/awesome-skills --skill n8n-validation-expert명령은 한 줄로 유지됩니다. 복사하기 전에 가로로 스크롤해 전체 내용을 확인하세요.
로컬 사본을 원하시나요? SkillsMP에서 현재 제공할 수 있는 파일을 다운로드하세요.
Generate project-specific AGENTS.md and companion rules by analyzing a codebase. Supports full, minimal, update, and dry-run modes with package-manager detection, monorepos, backups, managed blocks, c
Run protected AAS maintainer sweeps, PR merge batches, canonical sync, Core preview checks, and scripted releases. Use for repository maintenance, main alignment, CLI/MCP/Workbench changes, or release
Provision backend infra through Cohesivity (cohesivity.ai): Postgres, hosting, auth, storage, and AI model APIs over one HTTP API. Use when a .cohesivity file exists or a project needs a backend.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
SKILL.md 표시 중
| name | n8n-validation-expert |
| description | Expert guide for interpreting and fixing n8n validation errors. |
| category | Document Processing |
| source | antigravity |
| tags | ["javascript","node","api","mcp","ai","automation","workflow","document","security","rag"] |
| url | https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills/tree/main/skills/n8n-validation-expert |
Expert guide for interpreting and fixing n8n validation errors.
missing_required, invalid_value, expression failures, or iterative validate-fix loops.Validate early, validate often
Validation is typically iterative:
Key insight: Validation is an iterative process, not one-shot!
Blocks workflow execution - Must be resolved before activation
Types:
missing_required - Required field not providedinvalid_value - Value doesn't match allowed optionstype_mismatch - Wrong data type (string instead of number)invalid_reference - Referenced node doesn't existinvalid_expression - Expression syntax errorExample:
{
"type": "missing_required",
"property": "channel",
"message": "Channel name is required",
"fix": "Provide a channel name (lowercase, no spaces, 1-80 characters)"
}
Doesn't block execution - Workflow can be activated but may have issues
Types:
best_practice - Recommended but not requireddeprecated - Using old API/featureperformance - Potential performance issueExample:
{
"type": "best_practice",
"property": "errorHandling",
"message": "Slack API can have rate limits",
"suggestion": "Add onError: 'continueRegularOutput' with retryOnFail"
}
Nice to have - Improvements that could enhance workflow
Types:
optimization - Could be more efficientalternative - Better way to achieve same result7,841 occurrences of this pattern:
1. Configure node
↓
2. validate_node (23 seconds thinking about errors)
↓
3. Read error messages carefully
↓
4. Fix errors
↓
5. validate_node again (58 seconds fixing)
↓
6. Repeat until valid (usually 2-3 iterations)
// Iteration 1
let config = {
resource: "channel",
operation: "create"
};
const result1 = validate_node({
nodeType: "nodes-base.slack",
config,
profile: "runtime"
});
// → Error: Missing "name"
// ⏱️ 23 seconds thinking...
// Iteration 2
config.name = "general";
const result2 = validate_node({
nodeType: "nodes-base.slack",
config,
profile: "runtime"
});
// → Error: Missing "text"
// ⏱️ 58 seconds fixing...
// Iteration 3
config.text = "Hello!";
const result3 = validate_node({
nodeType: "nodes-base.slack",
config,
profile: "runtime"
});
// → Valid! ✅
This is normal! Don't be discouraged by multiple iterations.
Choose the right profile for your stage:
Use when: Quick checks during editing
Validates:
Pros: Fastest, most permissive Cons: May miss issues
Use when: Pre-deployment validation
Validates:
Pros: Balanced, catches real errors Cons: Some edge cases missed
This is the recommended profile for most use cases
Use when: AI-generated configurations
Validates:
Pros: Less noisy for AI workflows Cons: May allow some questionable configs
Use when: Production deployment, critical workflows
Validates:
Pros: Maximum safety Cons: Many warnings, some false positives
What it means: A required field is not provided
How to fix:
get_node to see required fieldsExample:
// Error
{
"type": "missing_required",
"property": "channel",
"message": "Channel name is required"
}
// Fix
config.channel = "#general";
What it means: Value doesn't match allowed options
How to fix:
get_node to see optionsExample:
// Error
{
"type": "invalid_value",
"property": "operation",
"message": "Operation must be one of: post, update, delete",
"current": "send"
}
// Fix
config.operation = "post"; // Use valid operation
What it means: Wrong data type for field
How to fix:
Example:
// Error
{
"type": "type