소스 정보
- 저장소
- rapidsai/cudf
- 최근 소스 활동
- 2026년 5월 20일 22:25
- 감지된 SKILL.md 언어
- 영어
- 스타
- 9,726
- 포크
- 1,090
설치 방법
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
소스 파일 검토
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
메뉴
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
직접 명령은 검토 Prompt를 거치지 않습니다. 실행하기 전에 소스를 확인하세요.
npx skills add https://github.com/rapidsai/cudf --skill review-cudf명령은 한 줄로 유지됩니다. 복사하기 전에 가로로 스크롤해 전체 내용을 확인하세요.
로컬 사본을 원하시나요? SkillsMP에서 현재 제공할 수 있는 파일을 다운로드하세요.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
SKILL.md 표시 중
| name | review-cudf |
| description | Use this skill to review GitHub pull requests for cudf |
Use this skill when the user invokes /review-cudf with:
cudf GitHub repository is located at: https://github.com/rapidsai/cudf
gh pr view <PR_NUMBER> --repo rapidsai/cudf --json title,body,files,additions,deletions,baseRefName,headRefName
gh pr diff <PR_NUMBER> --repo rapidsai/cudf
Hint: Check if GH_TOKEN (or GitHub CLI auth) is already configured in the environment (for example via your secret manager) so gh can authenticate and bypass rate limits; do not run gh auth token from within the agent. If gh auth is unavailable, fall back to GitHub's raw diff/patch URLs, git fetch of the PR ref, unauthenticated GitHub REST API with curl, or any other available methods.
Fetch review comments already posted for context on what's already been suggested and need not be repeated.
Read the Developer Guide (cpp/doxygen/developer_guide/DEVELOPER_GUIDE.md) — it is the authoritative reference for libcudf conventions. All rules in the guide apply during review. The checklist below calls out the most review-relevant rules and adds items not covered by the guide.
Analyze the changes against the checklist below, reading relevant source files as needed for context.
Produce a structured review using the output format at the bottom.
Dump the structured review to .agents/reviews/<PR_NUMBER>/review.md
For the detailed review checklist, read these files:
cpp/REVIEW_GUIDELINES.mdpython/REVIEW_GUIDELINES.mdcpp/doxygen/developer_guide/DEVELOPER_GUIDE.mdcpp/doxygen/developer_guide/TESTING.mdcpp/doxygen/developer_guide/BENCHMARKING.mdcpp/doxygen/developer_guide/DOCUMENTATION.mdUse all applicable checklist items from those files when reviewing the PR. The Developer Guide is the authoritative reference for libcudf conventions — all rules in the guide apply during review.
| Topic | Path |
|---|---|
| Developer guide | cpp/doxygen/developer_guide/DEVELOPER_GUIDE.md |
| Testing guide | cpp/doxygen/developer_guide/TESTING.md |
| Benchmarking guide | cpp/doxygen/developer_guide/BENCHMARKING.md |
| Documentation guide | cpp/doxygen/developer_guide/DOCUMENTATION.md |
| Profiling guide | cpp/doxygen/developer_guide/PROFILING.md |
Online libcudf API docs if needed: https://docs.rapids.ai/api/cudf/nightly/libcudf/
Structure your review as follows:
## PR Review: <PR title>
**PR:** <link>
**Summary:** <1-2 sentence summary of what the PR does>
### Findings
#### Critical
- **[file:line]** Description of issue that must be fixed before merge.
#### Suggestions
- **[file:line]** Description of improvement to consider.
#### Nits
- **[file:line]** Minor style or formatting issue. Keep these minimal, don't suggest adding comments around every line of code or obvious logic.
#### Highlights
- Highlight well-written code, good test coverage, or clever solutions.
### Verdict
One of: **Approve**, **Request Changes**, or **Comment**
With a brief justification.
If there are no findings in a category, omit that category.