원클릭으로
DeepScientist
DeepScientist에는 ResearAI에서 수집한 skills 22개가 있으며, 저장소 수준 직업 범위와 사이트 내 skill 상세 페이지를 제공합니다.
이 저장소의 skills
Use for natural-science or engineering tasks, scientific software routing, simulation, dataset analysis, model fitting, package checks, HPC-through-shell work, validation, and evidence-backed scientific claims using DeepScientist's `artifact.science(...)` Science Evidence Graph. Includes a progressive-disclosure catalog of FermiLink skilled-scipkg package cards.
Prepare, audit, or revise Nature-ready Data Availability statements, data repository plans, dataset citations, and FAIR metadata checklists for manuscripts. Use when the user asks about Nature data availability, research data sharing, repository selection, accession numbers, restricted or sensitive data, source data, supplementary datasets, DataCite-style dataset references, FAIR metadata for academic publication, or Chinese-to-English data availability wording for Chinese-speaking authors preparing Nature-family submissions.
Submission-grade Nature/high-impact journal figure workflow for Python or R. Use whenever the user asks to create, revise, audit, or polish manuscript figures, multi-panel scientific plots, or journal-ready SVG/PDF/TIFF outputs, especially for Nature-family or other high-impact journals. Before plotting, define the figure's conclusion, evidence logic, export needs, and review risks. If the user has not chosen Python or R, ask "Python or R?" and stop. Use only the selected backend for figure generation, previewing, exporting, and QA. Supports matplotlib/seaborn and ggplot2/patchwork/ComplexHeatmap. Not for dashboards or Illustrator/Figma-first infographics.
Build a complete but efficient Nature-style Chinese PPTX presentation from a scientific paper, preprint, PDF, article text, abstract, figure legends, or reading notes. Use this skill whenever the user asks to make slides/PPT/PPTX for journal club, group meeting, paper sharing, thesis seminar, lab meeting, department report, or academic presentation from a research paper, not only medical papers. It identifies the paper type and argument, selects only the figures needed for the story, writes Chinese slide content and speaker notes, creates the actual .pptx deck, and performs lightweight verification with cross-platform Python tooling by default.
Polish, restructure, or translate academic prose into Nature-leaning English using the paper-architecture and writing-strategy principles from Scientific English Writing & Communication, with phrase-level support from Academic Phrasebank. Use whenever the user asks to polish a manuscript paragraph, abstract, introduction, results, discussion, conclusion, title, methods section, or Chinese academic draft for publication-quality English.
Use when a quest has enough evidence to draft or refine a paper, report, or research summary without inventing missing support.
Use when a draft, paper, or paper-like report is substantial enough for an independent skeptical audit before finalization, rebuttal, or revision routing.
Use when a quest needs concrete hypotheses, limitation analysis, candidate directions, or a selected idea relative to the active baseline.
Use when the quest needs an explicit go, stop, branch, reuse-baseline, write, finalize, reset, or user-decision transition with reasons and evidence.
Use when a quest needs one or more follow-up runs such as ablations, robustness checks, error analysis, or failure analysis after a main experiment.
Use when a quest needs to attach, import, reproduce, repair, verify, compare, or publish a baseline and its metrics.
Use when a quest is ready for a concrete implementation pass or a main experiment run tied to a selected idea and an accepted baseline.
Use when an algorithm-first quest should manage candidate briefs, optimization frontier, branch promotion, or fusion-aware search instead of the paper-oriented default loop.
Use when creating, revising, validating, or repairing a research-paper outline before writing; turns experiment evidence into a clear paper idea, scoped claims, method abstraction, evaluation plan, analysis plan, and evidence boundaries without copying run logs into the manuscript.
Use when a quest needs problem framing, literature scouting, dataset or metric clarification, or baseline discovery before deeper work.
Use when the quest is ready to consolidate final claims, limitations, recommendations, summary state, and graph exports before stopping or archiving.
Use when a quest does not start from a blank state and the agent must first audit, trust-rank, and reconcile existing baselines, results, drafts, or review materials before choosing the next anchor.
Use when structured numeric data, arrays, or CSV-like measurements should be turned into a publication-quality figure by adapting a bundled paper-style plotting template instead of improvising a new chart from scratch.
Install, repair, and validate DeepScientist on Windows with WSL2 until the Windows browser can open the DeepScientist Web UI. Use when an agent needs to set up or fix DeepScientist on a Windows machine, including WSL distro creation, Linux-side Node/Python prerequisites, Codex auth/relay configuration, WSL proxy troubleshooting, and final `ds doctor` or Web UI verification.
Use when a quest already has a paper, draft, or review package and the task is to map reviewer feedback into experiments, manuscript deltas, and a durable rebuttal / revision response.
Use when a quest needs a polished milestone chart, paper-facing figure, appendix figure, or a mandatory render-inspect-revise pass before treating a figure as final.
Look up any arxiv paper on alphaxiv.org to get a structured AI-generated overview. This is faster and more reliable than trying to read a raw PDF.