Skip to main content

writing-fragments

Grilling session that mines the user for fragments - heterogeneous nuggets of writing (claims, vignettes, sharp sentences, half-thoughts) - and appends them to a single document as raw material for a future article. Use when the user wants to develop ideas before imposing structure, or mentions "fragments", "ideate", or "raw material" for writing.

소스 정보

저장소
sammcj/agentic-coding
최근 소스 활동
2026년 8월 14일 05:51
감지된 SKILL.md 언어
영어
스타
164
포크
25

설치 방법

기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.

소스 파일 검토

설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.

SKILL.md 표시 중

SKILL.md
소스 지침 · 읽기 전용 미리보기
name
writing-fragments
description
Grilling session that mines the user for fragments - heterogeneous nuggets of writing (claims, vignettes, sharp sentences, half-thoughts) - and appends them to a single document as raw material for a future article. Use when the user wants to develop ideas before imposing structure, or mentions "fragments", "ideate", or "raw material" for writing.
metadata
{"source":"Inspired by https://github.com/mattpocock/skills"}
<what-to-do> Run a grilling session that produces fragments. Interview the user relentlessly about whatever they want to write about. Do not impose phases, outlines, or structure - that is explicitly out of scope. As fragments emerge from either side of the conversation, append them to a single markdown file. The user will be editing this file during the session; always re-read it before writing so their edits are preserved. If the user did not pass a path, ask once where to save the document, then remember it for the rest of the session. Capture fragments from the very first thing the user says, including the initial prompt. On first write, put a single H1 at the top with a working title (it can change later) and nothing else - no metadata, no TOC, no date. </what-to-do> <supporting-info> ## What is a fragment A fragment is any piece of text that might survive into the final article. It must be _readable by the author_ - the author can tell what it means - but it does not need to define its terms or be comprehensible to a cold reader. The bar is "is this a piece of good writing?", not "is this a self-contained argument?" Fragments are deliberately heterogeneous. Examples of what could be a fragment: - A sharp sentence you'd want to deploy somewhere but don't yet know where. - A claim with a one-line justification. - A vignette: a thing that happened, a code snippet, a scenario, an analogy. - A half-thought: "something about how X feels like Y, work this out later." - A quote, a piece of dialogue, an overheard line. - A list of related observations that hang together by feel. - A complaint, a confession, a punchline. The novelist's diary is the model: years of unstructured noticings that later get mined for raw material. Fragments are noticings. ## File format ```markdown # Working title A first fragment lives here. It can be multiple paragraphs. It can include lists, code, quotes - whatever shape the fragment naturally takes. --- A second fragment. --- > A quoted line that the user wants to keep around. A reaction to it. --- - A cluster of related observations - That hang together by feel - And want to be near each other ``` Fragments are separated by a horizontal rule (`\n---\n`). No headings inside the body. No tags. No order beyond the order they were added. ## Writing rhythm Append silently. Don't ask permission for each fragment. Mention what you added in passing ("adding that"), but don't interrupt the conversation with save dialogues. Before every write: re-read the file from disk. The user may have edited, reordered, or deleted fragments between turns - preserve their changes. Never overwrite the file; only append (or, if the user asks, edit a specific fragment in place). The user can say "cut the last one", "rewrite that one sharper", "merge those two" at any time. Treat those as first-class instructions. </supporting-info>
GitHub에서 보기