Skip to main content

retro

Retrospective on a coding session that proposes changes to the agent's environment (checks, pointers, steering, tooling) so the next run goes better.

소스 정보

저장소
sammcj/agentic-coding
최근 소스 활동
2026년 10월 5일 23:56
감지된 SKILL.md 언어
영어
스타
164
포크
25

설치 방법

기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.

소스 파일 검토

설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.

파일 탐색기
2 개 파일

SKILL.md 표시 중

SKILL.md
소스 지침 · 읽기 전용 미리보기
name
retro
description
Retrospective on a coding session that proposes changes to the agent's environment (checks, pointers, steering, tooling) so the next run goes better.
disable-model-invocation
true
compatibility
claude-code
argument-hint
[session-id or transcript path]
metadata
{"source":"https://github.com/mattpocock/skills (adapted)"}
# Retro Propose improvements to the agent's **environment** based on where a session struggled. Propose only: change nothing until the user picks a candidate. Fix the environment, not the code the session produced (that is `code-review`). ## Steps 1. Create a task per step below, each with its completion criterion. 2. Get the session record: - No session named: use the current conversation. - Session named, or the current one is too long to recall reliably: run `python3 scripts/session_digest.py <id-or-path>` (`--list N --project <repo>` to find it). Digest each subagent transcript it lists when the struggle happened there. 3. Mark the **struggle moments**: errors, retries, hook blocks, long searches, oversized results, compactions, user corrections, wrong turns. Cite each by digest call number (`#12`) or by quoting the user. 4. Read the repo's existing checks (`Makefile`, `package.json` scripts, pre-commit config, CI workflows, `.claude/settings.json` hooks). A check that exists but is unwired or broken is the finding, in place of a new one. 5. Map each struggle moment to a candidate using the categories below. Drop any candidate you can't trace to a struggle moment. 6. Present candidates ranked by severity: cost of the struggle times how often it will recur. Each candidate states the moment, the fix, and the file it lands in. ## Categories - **Navigation**: the agent took long to find a file or fact. Fix: a pointer from a file it already reads. - **Automated checks**: the agent made a mistake a tool could catch. Fix: lint rule, type, test, pre-commit hook, CI job, or a Claude Code PreToolUse/PostToolUse hook. A repo with no **guardrail** (no pre-commit hook and no CI running lint/typecheck/test) is a finding in itself. - **Coding standards**: the reviewer missed a mistake. Classify it first. **Mechanical** (banned API, import shape, file location, fixed syntax) gets a deterministic check. **Judgement call** (cross-file consistency, matching surrounding style) goes in the repo's standards doc (`CODING_STANDARDS.md` or `CONTRIBUTING.md`). `code-review` reads only what the repo documents, so a new standards doc also needs a one-line pointer from the project `CLAUDE.md`. - **Steering bloat**: global `~/.claude/CLAUDE.md`, project `CLAUDE.md`/`AGENTS.md`, `.claude/rules/`, auto-memory `MEMORY.md`, SessionStart hook context, or model-invoked skill descriptions are large. Fix: move instructions into checks or standards, path-scope them into rules, or tighten a skill description or make it user-invoked. - **No-ops**: steering lines the agent already obeys by default, or ignored anyway. Fix: delete, or replace with a check. Treat each as a candidate for the deletion test, judged on one session. - **Skills**: a skill failed to fire, fired wrongly, or its instructions misled the agent. Fix: its description or body. - **Tool economy**: a tool call was expensive for what it returned (see oversized results in the digest), or the agent repeated a call. Fix: a cheaper command, a script, or a narrower tool. - **Information access**: the agent lacked information it needed. Fix: tee dev server logs to a file, read-only access to a service, a docs pointer. - **Sandbox and permissions**: a sandbox or hook block cost retries. Fix: the command pattern the agent should have used, or a sandbox/permission rule change for the user to make. ## Placement The implementer has the most context pressure: it explores, writes code and debugs. The reviewer gets a diff. Put rules where there is room to apply them. - Steering files (`CLAUDE.md`, `AGENTS.md`, SessionStart hooks) load into every session. Reserve them for navigation pointers and rules that apply to every task. - A recurring mistake becomes a failing check before it becomes prose. - Judgement rules go to the reviewer's standards doc, not `CLAUDE.md`. Extend an existing doc before writing a new one. - A user preference correction belongs in auto-memory as a `feedback` memory. Repo facts belong in the repo. ## Applying a picked candidate Load the matching skill before editing: - `CLAUDE.md` or `.claude/rules/` -> `authoring-claude-md` - A skill -> `skill-creator-primer` - Hooks, permissions or settings -> `update-config` Run a proposed check against the repo before letting it block anything.
GitHub에서 보기