| name | causal-genomics-effector-gene-prioritization |
| description | Maps GWAS-implicated loci to candidate effector (causal) genes by integrating variant-to-gene (V2G) features via Open Targets L2G (Mountjoy 2021), MAGMA gene-based association (de Leeuw 2015), FUMA SNP2GENE, cS2G combined SNP-to-gene scores (Gazal 2022), Polygenic Priority Scores (PoPS, Weeks 2023), FLAMES, INQUISIT, DEPICT, and enhancer-gene predictors (ABC, ENCODE-rE2G). Use when narrowing a GWAS lead locus to a candidate causal gene, picking between proximity, eQTL-based, and similarity-based prioritizers, integrating multi-evidence streams (fine-mapping, colocalization, ABC enhancer-gene, distance, chromatin), reconciling discordant L2G vs PoPS calls, prioritizing tissue-specific eQTL evidence, or triangulating across at least three independent lines of evidence for a publication-grade effector-gene nomination. |
| tool_type | mixed |
| primary_tool | MAGMA |
Version Compatibility
Reference examples tested with: MAGMA 1.10+ (ctglab.nl/software/magma), FUMA web platform v1.6+ (fuma.ctglab.nl), Open Targets Genetics API (REST + GraphQL, June 2024 release), PoPS (head of FinucaneLab/pops, 2024), cS2G pre-computed scores (alkesgroup.broadinstitute.org/cS2G/, 2022), ABC-Enhancer-Gene-Prediction 0.2.2+, ENCODE-rE2G v1.0+ (2024), DEPICT v1 rel194, INQUISIT (Fachal 2020 supplementary), Python 3.9-3.11, R 4.3+, PLINK 1.9 + PLINK 2.0.
Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:
- CLI:
magma --help to confirm gene-window, gene-annot, and gene-set flag names
- Python:
pip show ot-graphql opentargets-genetics; introspect endpoints at api.genetics.opentargets.org/graphql
- R:
packageVersion('coloc') etc. for upstream evidence integration
If a script throws an error about an argument that has moved (e.g. an Open Targets endpoint renamed during a release) or a model file schema change, introspect the installed tool and adapt rather than retrying. Open Targets Genetics deprecated the standalone Genetics Portal in 2024 in favour of the integrated platform; verify endpoint URLs at the time of use.
Effector Gene Prioritization
"Which gene at this GWAS locus is actually the causal mediator?" -> Integrate fine-mapping, colocalization, chromatin-based enhancer-gene predictions, distance, and gene-similarity priors into a per-locus per-gene confidence score, then require concordance across multiple orthogonal evidence streams before nominating a causal effector. Effector gene prioritization is the bridge between statistical fine-mapping (variant level) and biological hypothesis (gene level); it is the most failure-prone step in GWAS-to-target pipelines because the nearest-gene assumption is wrong roughly 30-50% of the time at well-studied loci.
- CLI (gene-level association):
magma --bfile ref --gene-loc geneloc.txt --pval gwas.tsv ncol=N --out out -> magma --gene-results out.genes.raw --set-annot annot.txt --out out
- Web (integrative): FUMA SNP2GENE at fuma.ctglab.nl (positional + eQTL + Hi-C + chromatin in one workflow)
- API (pre-computed L2G): Open Targets Genetics GraphQL
studyLocus2GeneTable query (note: Open Targets Genetics was consolidated into the Open Targets Platform in 2024; verify the live endpoint at api.platform.opentargets.org/api/v4/graphql)
- Python (similarity prior):
python pops.py --gene_annot gene_annot.txt --features features --magma_prefix magma_out --out out
- Lookup (combined SNP-to-gene): cS2G pre-computed gene scores at alkesgroup.broadinstitute.org/cS2G/
- CLI (enhancer-gene): ABC pipeline or ENCODE-rE2G (cross-reference atac-seq/enhancer-gene-linking)
V2G is not one method but a portfolio. Open Targets L2G aggregates per-locus per-gene features (distance + coloc + chromatin + V2G) trained on curated gold-standard genes; PoPS adds an orthogonal genome-wide polygenic prior from gene-pathway co-membership; MAGMA provides the lightweight gene-level p-value baseline. Strong effector calls emerge from concordance across these orthogonal signal types, not from any single tool.
Algorithmic Taxonomy
| Tool | Model | Inputs | Output | Strength | Fails when |
|---|
| Open Targets L2G (Mountjoy 2021 Nat Genet 53:1527) | Gradient-boosting classifier on per-(locus, gene) features (distance, fine-mapping, coloc, chromatin, V2G) trained on curated gold standards | Pre-computed per study; queried via API | Per-(study, locus, gene) L2G score 0-1 | Most validated integrative scorer; built into Open Targets Platform; updated quarterly | Trait must be in OT release; custom traits need re-training; coverage limited to OT-curated GWAS catalog |
| V2G (Ghoussaini 2021 Nat Genet 53:1530) | Open Targets V2G feature aggregator: per-variant eQTL/sQTL/pQTL + chromatin + distance | OT pre-computed | Per-(variant, gene) score | Variant-resolution; complements locus-resolution L2G | Feature weights are fixed; cannot tune per-trait |
| MAGMA (de Leeuw 2015 PLoS Comput Biol 11:e1004219) | SNP-to-gene window aggregation + multiple regression on summary statistics | GWAS sumstats + gene annotation + LD reference (PLINK bfile) | Gene-level Z, p; gene-set p | Mature, fast, lightweight; supports gene-set enrichment in same pass; widely cited | Window choice (0+0 vs 35kb+10kb vs 50kb+50kb) shifts top genes; cannot detect distal regulation outside window |
| FUMA SNP2GENE (Watanabe 2017 Nat Commun 8:1826) | Web platform combining positional + eQTL + Hi-C + chromatin annotation + MAGMA | Sumstats upload to fuma.ctglab.nl | Annotated locus + prioritised gene table | One-click integrative analysis; no local install needed; community standard for GWAS post-hoc | Web-only; no API for high-throughput; pre-baked annotations may lag latest reference releases |
| cS2G (Gazal 2022 Nat Genet 54:827) | Weighted aggregation of 10 SNP-to-gene strategies (Closest TSS, ABC, fine-mapped eQTL, etc.) calibrated on heritability enrichment | Per-SNP lookup | Combined per-SNP score allocated to genes | Heritability-calibrated; pre-computed gene scores for downstream filtering | Aggregation weights are population-averaged; cell-type-specific signal averaged out; coverage limited to baseline-LF SNP universe |
| PoPS (Weeks 2023 Nat Genet 55:1267) | LASSO regression of per-gene MAGMA Z on genome-wide gene-feature matrix (pathway membership, co-expression, PPI) | MAGMA Z + gene-feature matrix | Per-gene priority score (PoPS); per-locus relative ranking | Orthogonal to distance / proximity; identifies genes with similar pathway / co-expression profile to other GWAS hits | Pathway co-membership similarity is similarity-based; can hand-feed bias if features are not curated; complementary to L2G, not redundant |
| FLAMES / Funmap2 (Lake 2024) | Combined per-feature scoring with deep learning + integrative scoring | Sumstats + features | Per-gene prioritisation | Recent integrative method | Limited validation outside the publication test set; method choice still evolving |
| INQUISIT (Fachal 2020 Nat Genet 52:56) | Three-level scoring for coding, regulatory-proximal, regulatory-distal; trait-specific (breast cancer) | Sumstats + cancer-specific annotation panel | Per-gene INQUISIT score | Cancer-tuned; integrates expression and chromatin context | Originally trait-specific (breast cancer); adapting to other diseases requires re-curation |
| DEPICT (Pers 2015 Nat Commun 6:5890) | Empirical Bayes; gene set enrichment + tissue prioritisation + reconstituted gene sets | Sumstats | Per-gene p; pathway enrichment; tissue priority | Old but still cited; combines three useful outputs | Reconstituted gene sets are dated (2015 expression panel); largely superseded by L2G + PoPS combination |
| ABC + ENCODE-rE2G | Activity x Contact enhancer-gene model (Fulco 2019) and logistic-regression refinement (ENCODE 2024) | ATAC + H3K27ac + Hi-C/Micro-C | Per-(enhancer, gene) score | Direct mechanistic enhancer-gene link in matched cell type; gold-standard for distal regulation | Requires matched epigenome data; cell-type-specific; covered in detail in atac-seq/enhancer-gene-linking |
| sc-eQTL + cell-type-specific TWAS (e.g. Yazar 2022 OneK1K) | Per-cell-type eQTL panels + per-cell-type prediction weights | sc-eQTL panel + sumstats | Cell-type-resolved gene candidates | Resolves cell-type-specific causal genes that bulk-tissue TWAS averages out | Requires matched single-cell eQTL panel; not yet pre-built for most cell types |
Methodology evolves; verify against the current Open Targets release (platform-docs.opentargets.org), the latest PoPS feature matrix at FinucaneLab/pops, and ABC / ENCODE-rE2G releases before locking on a single prioritiser. The L2G + PoPS combination is the current de facto two-method baseline; cS2G is the heritability-calibrated lookup; FUMA is the no-install community standard.
Decision Tree by Scenario
| Scenario | Recommended workflow | Why |
|---|
| Open Targets Platform covers the trait | Query L2G via GraphQL + cross-check V2G; sanity-check with PoPS | Pre-computed, gold-standard-validated; minimal compute |
| Custom trait, EUR GWAS sumstats only | MAGMA + manual fine-mapping (SuSiE) + coloc per QTL panel | Build evidence streams from primitives; combine in own integrative scorer |
| Tissue known (e.g. liver for lipid traits) | Tissue-specific eQTL coloc + ABC / ENCODE-rE2G + S-PrediXcan + L2G | Tissue-targeted evidence reduces false positives from wrong-tissue eQTLs |
| Tissue unknown a priori | LDSC-SEG (Finucane 2018 Nat Genet 50:621) to prioritise tissue + S-MultiXcan + PoPS | Identify causal tissue before locking on a single eQTL panel |
| Distal / long-range regulation suspected | ABC / ENCODE-rE2G / HiChIP / Cicero overlay; deprioritise distance-only methods | Nearest-gene fails ~ 30-50% of the time at well-studied loci |
| Polygenic background trait (e.g. height, BMI) | L2G + PoPS concordance | PoPS captures pathway prior absent from L2G features; concordance flags strong candidates |
| Publication-grade triangulation | All evidence streams; require concordance across >= 3 orthogonal lines | High-confidence claim defensible to reviewers |
| Multi-ancestry GWAS | MAGMA per ancestry + ancestry-specific eQTL coloc + MA-FOCUS for TWAS | Single-ancestry weights miscalibrated for other ancestries |
| Locus with no coding variants, no significant eQTL | ABC / ENCODE-rE2G in candidate tissue + chromatin annotation; tag as "regulatory of unknown gene" | Distance + chromatin may be the only signal; acknowledge low confidence |
| HLA region (chr6:28477797-33448354 hg19; chr6:28510120-33480577 hg38; extended chr6:25-35 Mb both builds) | Exclude or use HLA-imputation; do not run standard V2G; verify build before excluding | Long-range LD breaks every gene-by-gene method |
Per-Method Failure Modes
Nearest-gene assumption fails (most common pitfall)
Trigger: Assigning the GWAS lead variant to the closest gene without checking long-range regulation.
Mechanism: Approximately 30-50% of well-fine-mapped GWAS variants regulate a gene that is NOT the nearest TSS (Mountjoy 2021; Fulco 2019 Nat Genet 51:1664; Stacey 2019 Nat Commun 10:4502). Distal enhancer-promoter contacts span 50 kb to > 1 Mb; LD around the lead variant often spans only kilobases, so the credible-set centroid may sit closer to a passenger gene than to the true target.
Symptom: Distance-based prioritisation names the nearest gene; subsequent eQTL coloc, ABC, and ENCODE-rE2G converge on a different gene at the same locus. Functional validation (CRISPRi at the variant) confirms the distal gene.
Fix: Use L2G (which includes distance but does not let it dominate), PoPS (which is distance-orthogonal by construction), and ABC / ENCODE-rE2G when matched epigenome data are available. Report all candidate genes at the locus with their evidence-stream contributions; do not collapse to the nearest by default.
eQTL tissue mis-specification
Trigger: Using a single-tissue eQTL panel (e.g. whole blood) when the causal tissue is different (e.g. liver for lipid traits, hypothalamus for energy balance).
Mechanism: Cis-eQTL effect sizes are tissue-specific; eQTLs in the wrong tissue still tag the GWAS signal via LD and produce spurious colocalisations or TWAS hits. The right gene at the wrong tissue is statistically detectable but biologically uninterpretable.
Symptom: Strong colocalisation in a tissue biologically irrelevant to the trait; null in the expected tissue. LDSC-SEG / CELLEX / EWCE prioritisation on the GWAS sumstats independently disagrees with the eQTL tissue.
Fix: Run multi-tissue eQTL coloc (e.g. all GTEx tissues via S-MultiXcan + per-tissue coloc) and prioritise the tissue identified by LDSC-SEG (Finucane 2018 Nat Genet 50:621) or CELLEX. For cell-type-specific traits, move to sc-eQTL panels (OneK1K, Yazar 2022 Science 376:eabf3041). S-MultiXcan (Barbeira 2019 PLoS Genet 15:e1007889) jointly tests per-tissue z-scores via PC-decomposition of LD-induced covariance and is preferred for standard GTEx v8 panels (pre-computed weights available); UTMOST (Hu 2019 Nat Genet 51:568) imputes cross-tissue expression weights before testing and is preferred when retraining cross-tissue weights for a custom panel.
MAGMA gene-window choice
Trigger: Default --gene-loc with 0kb upstream / 0kb downstream window assigns all SNPs only within annotated gene bodies.
Mechanism: A wide window (e.g. 35kb upstream + 10kb downstream) captures more regulatory SNPs per gene but assigns each tag-SNP to multiple genes simultaneously, diluting per-gene signal and inflating false positives at gene-dense regions. A narrow window misses regulatory SNPs outside the gene body and loses true positives at intergenic enhancers. The three window conventions in circulation are not interchangeable: MAGMA-native default is 0+0 (no expansion); the MAGMA paper recommended a 50+50 sensitivity check; FUMA SNP2GENE uses 35+10 (35 kb upstream + 10 kb downstream) which is FUMA's convention, NOT MAGMA's default. For brain traits, 50+50 captures distal cis-eQTL signal; for cardiometabolic traits a tighter 10+10 is more conservative. State explicitly which window was used in methods reporting.
Symptom: Many genes per locus flagged at p < 0.05/22k with the wide window; few genes at all flagged with the narrow window; top genes change substantially across window choices.
Fix: Use a sensible default (35kb upstream + 10kb downstream is the FUMA recommendation; 0+0 is MAGMA-native; 50+50 is the MAGMA-paper sensitivity window). Always pair MAGMA with eQTL-based mapping (S-PrediXcan, coloc) for distal-regulatory signal; MAGMA alone is the lightweight baseline, not the full answer.
Wide-window 1Mb warning: Going to 100+100 kb or 1 Mb assigns one SNP to 8-12 genes simultaneously at gene-dense loci (e.g. MHC, chr19q13, chr17q21), diluting power and creating interpretation ambiguity. Avoid 1Mb windows; if distal regulation is suspected supplement with ABC / ENCODE-rE2G enhancer-gene linkage (cross-reference atac-seq/enhancer-gene-linking) rather than widening the MAGMA window.
Coloc fails when the locus has multiple causal variants
Trigger: PP.H4 < threshold despite biological evidence that the gene is causal.
Mechanism: coloc.abf's single-causal-variant assumption forces posterior mass to PP.H3 (distinct causal variants) when 2+ independent signals in moderate LD drive both traits. The result is a false-negative coloc call at a true effector-gene locus.
Symptom: Visual LocusZoom overlap is convincing but PP.H4 stays in 0.3-0.6; coloc.susie or eCAVIAR reveals multiple credible sets and a per-credible-set PP.H4 > 0.7.
Fix: Run coloc.susie (not coloc.abf) at gene-dense / signal-rich loci. Cross-reference causal-genomics/colocalization-analysis; do not rely on coloc.abf as the sole coloc evidence stream when allelic heterogeneity is plausible.
PoPS vs L2G discordance
Trigger: PoPS top-ranked gene at locus disagrees with L2G top-ranked gene.
Mechanism: PoPS uses similarity-based features (pathway membership, co-expression, PPI), L2G uses per-locus features (distance, fine-mapping, coloc, chromatin). They are orthogonal by construction; disagreement is informative, not a failure.
Symptom: Same locus, different top gene under each method.
Fix: Use BOTH and treat concordance (top gene matches across L2G and PoPS) as the strongest single-locus signal short of CRISPR validation. Weeks 2023 (Nat Genet 55:1267) reports concordant genes have 70-90% positive predictive value against curated gold-standard targets; discordant calls have approximately 30-40%. Report both ranks; flag concordance.
Pleiotropic locus / multiple causal genes per locus
Trigger: Two or more genes at a single GWAS locus are each independently causal (different SNPs or different mechanisms).
Mechanism: Standard V2G frameworks assume one causal gene per locus. Real biology violates this: 5-10% of GWAS loci have multiple causal genes (Mountjoy 2021; CRISPRi-FlowFISH catalogs).
Symptom: Two genes at the locus both pass conditional independence checks (FUSION --joint, GCTA-COJO); both show strong eQTL coloc; both have CRISPRi support.
Fix: Allow multi-gene reporting. Each candidate gene needs its own credible variant set (SuSiE / coloc.susie). Report the locus as multi-effector; consider CRISPRi-FlowFISH or MPRA for ground-truth resolution. Do not force a single-gene assignment. Existing CRISPRi-FlowFISH catalogs for cross-checking computational predictions: Fulco 2019 Nat Genet 51:1664 (~5,000 enhancer-gene pairs in K562); Gasperini 2019 Cell 176:377 (~75,000 pairs at-scale); Schraivogel 2020 Nat Methods 17:629 (multi-cell-type). Cite the specific catalog when reporting "validated against CRISPRi" rather than the generic term.
Per-Credible-Set Gene-Assignment Hierarchy
When fine-mapping returns credible sets (cross-reference causal-genomics/fine-mapping), each credible variant should be assigned to a gene using a fixed lexicographic ladder rather than a single feature. The ladder collapses ambiguity by preferring direct mechanistic evidence first and falling back to weaker signals only when stronger ones are absent:
- Coding consequence at credible variant (missense, splice-donor / splice-acceptor, stop-gained, start-lost via VEP / Ensembl consequence) -> assign variant to that gene.
- eQTL / pQTL colocalization PP.H4 >= 0.7 with the gene's expression QTL (matched tissue) -> assign to that gene (cross-reference causal-genomics/colocalization-analysis).
- ABC or ENCODE-rE2G enhancer-gene linkage when matched ATAC + H3K27ac (+ optional Hi-C) is available in the candidate tissue -> assign to the linked gene (cross-reference atac-seq/enhancer-gene-linking).
- Nearest TSS -> assign as last-resort fallback; flag as low-confidence (nearest-gene is correct only 50-70% of the time at well-fine-mapped loci).
If a single credible variant ties across two or more genes at the same rung (e.g. coding consequence in gene A AND a competing eQTL coloc to gene B), report multi-gene candidacy explicitly rather than forcing a single assignment; the locus may be multi-effector or the credible set may straddle a regulatory boundary.
Multi-Evidence Integration Framework
A strong candidate causal gene at a GWAS locus requires concordance across multiple orthogonal evidence streams. The six canonical streams:
| Evidence stream | What it tests | Pass threshold | Source |
|---|
| Fine-mapping | SuSiE PIP for variant; variant assigned to gene by ABC or eQTL coloc | PIP > 0.5; credible set purity > 0.5 | susieR (cross-reference causal-genomics/fine-mapping) |
| Colocalization | Shared causal variant with gene's eQTL / pQTL / sQTL | coloc.abf or coloc.susie PP.H4 >= 0.7 | coloc (cross-reference causal-genomics/colocalization-analysis) |
| Distance | Variant within annotated regulatory unit (gene body or enhancer-gene unit) | Distance to TSS <= 100 kb OR within ABC enhancer-gene unit | Convention; Mountjoy 2021 |
| Polygenic prior (similarity) | Gene shares pathway / co-expression / PPI with other GWAS hits for the trait | PoPS score in top decile per locus | Weeks 2023 |
| L2G (integrative classifier) | Per-locus per-gene gradient-boosting on a panel of features | L2G score >= 0.5 (Open Targets default high-confidence) | Mountjoy 2021 |
| Chromatin / enhancer-gene | ABC or ENCODE-rE2G connects fine-mapped variant to gene's promoter | ABC >= 0.02 OR ENCODE-rE2G >= 0.5 | Fulco 2019; ENCODE 2024 |
| Deep-learning variant effect (optional 7th) | chromBPNet / EnFormer in silico variant effect on accessibility/expression at credible variant | |log2FC| > 1 (chromBPNet strong-effect); agreement across two models | chromBPNet: Pampari 2025 Nat Genet; EnFormer: Avsec 2021 Nat Methods 18:1196; cross-reference atac-seq/deep-learning-atac |
| Cross-trait coincidence (optional 8th) | Same gene flagged at related-trait loci (e.g. lipid GWAS at CHD lead variant) | Same gene top-ranked at >= 2 related traits | Convention |
Operational rule: Report a gene as a "high-confidence causal effector" only when >= 3 of the 6 core evidence streams are concordant (deep-learning variant effect and cross-trait coincidence are optional supplementary streams). >= 4 concordant is "strong-confidence"; >= 5 is "near-certain pending experimental validation". Single-stream evidence is associational only; two-stream concordance is suggestive. This is the standard used by Open Targets Genetics (Mountjoy 2021), GTEx-derived target nomination pipelines (Open Targets Platform), and pharma drug-discovery workflows.
Quantitative Thresholds
| Quantity | Threshold | Source / Rationale |
|---|
| L2G score (high-confidence) | >= 0.5 | Open Targets default; gradient-boosted classifier calibrated against curated gold standards |
| L2G score (suggestive) | >= 0.2 | Open Targets exploratory threshold |
| MAGMA gene-wide p | < 2.5e-6 (Bonferroni 0.05 / 20k genes) | Standard genome-wide gene-level significance |
| coloc PP.H4 (triangulation) | >= 0.7 | Open Targets / common practice; >= 0.8 for stringent |
| PoPS score (high-confidence) | Top decile per locus | Weeks 2023 Nat Genet 55:1267; threshold is relative per-locus rank, NOT an absolute cutoff. Absolute PoPS score is scale-dependent on trait polygenicity, so an absolute "PoPS >= 0.5" rule is incorrect across traits |
| ABC enhancer-gene score | >= 0.02 (standard) or >= 0.04 (stringent) | Fulco 2019; cross-reference atac-seq/enhancer-gene-linking |
| ENCODE-rE2G probability | >= 0.5 (binarised) | ENCODE 2024 |
| cS2G aggregate score | >= 0.5 per SNP-gene allocation | Gazal 2022; heritability-calibrated aggregator |
| Distance to TSS (regulatory window) | <= 100 kb (default); <= 500 kb (liberal); <= 1 Mb (absolute) | Convention; Mountjoy 2021. Beyond 100 kb distance ceases to be a reliable single feature |
| MAGMA gene-window | 35 kb upstream + 10 kb downstream | FUMA default; balances regulatory capture vs gene-dense dilution |
| Fine-mapping PIP (causal variant) | > 0.5 (suggestive); > 0.9 (strong) | Convention (cross-reference causal-genomics/fine-mapping) |
| Multi-evidence concordance | >= 3 of 6 streams | Operational rule from Open Targets Genetics and Mountjoy 2021 |
| Single-cell eQTL panel size | >= 200 donors per cell type | Below this, per-cell-type eQTL discovery underpowered |
MAGMA Gene-Based and Gene-Set Pipeline
Goal: Compute gene-level p-values from GWAS summary statistics and test gene sets (e.g. MSigDB pathways) for enrichment.
Approach: Pre-format the SNP-to-gene annotation (per-gene SNP membership using a configurable window); run gene-based analysis with --gene-results; downstream, test gene sets via --set-annot. MAGMA's lambda-correction handles LD via the reference panel.
magma --annotate window=35,10 \
--snp-loc gwas.snploc \
--gene-loc NCBI37.3.gene.loc \
--out annot_35_10
magma --bfile g1000_eur \
--pval gwas.pval ncol=N \
--gene-annot annot_35_10.genes.annot \
--out gene_step
magma --gene-results gene_step.genes.raw \
--set-annot msigdb_v7.5_C2.gmt \
--out gene_set_step
The --gene-annot window choice is the dominant methodological lever; 35kb upstream + 10kb downstream is the FUMA recommendation but is not universally accepted. Sensitivity over 0+0, 35+10, and 50+50 is good practice for high-stakes reports.
Open Targets L2G via GraphQL
Goal: Query pre-computed L2G scores for a study and locus without re-running the integrative pipeline.
Approach: Query the Open Targets GraphQL endpoint with a study ID and lead variant; parse per-gene scores.
Open Targets Platform vs Genetics Portal (2024 Consolidation)
In 2024 Open Targets Genetics was merged into the Open Targets Platform GraphQL API at api.platform.opentargets.org/api/v4/graphql. The legacy Genetics endpoint (api.genetics.opentargets.org/graphql) still responds but is deprecated; new pipelines should target the Platform API. The schema also changed: the Platform exposes credibleSet(studyLocusId) with l2GPredictions (target, score, SHAP per-feature explainability), whereas the legacy schema exposed studyLocus2GeneTable with yProbaModel and per-component sub-scores.
Legacy (Genetics, deprecated):
query L2G_legacy($studyId: String!, $variantId: String!) {
studyLocus2GeneTable(studyId: $studyId, variantId: $variantId) {
rows {
gene { symbol }
yProbaModel
yProbaDistance
yProbaMolecularQTL
hasColoc
}
}
}
Modern (Platform, recommended):
query L2G_modern($studyId: String!) {
credibleSet(studyLocusId: $studyId) {
l2GPredictions {
target { approvedSymbol }
score
shap { name value }
}
}
}
import requests
import pandas as pd
resp = requests.post('https://api.platform.opentargets.org/api/v4/graphql',
json={'query': '...modern L2G query...',
'variables': {'studyId': 'GCST006464_locus_42'}})
preds = resp.json()['data']['credibleSet']['l2GPredictions']
l2g_df = pd.json_normalize(preds).sort_values('score', ascending=False)
The headline score (Platform) corresponds to yProbaModel (legacy). Platform shap per-feature values replace the legacy yProba* sub-scores and explain what drove the prediction. Genes whose SHAP is dominated by the distance feature but minimal on QTL or chromatin features are distance-only candidates; trust the integrated score as primary.
PoPS Polygenic Priority Score
Goal: Add a distance-orthogonal similarity-based prior to ranked gene candidates.
Approach: Run MAGMA genome-wide to produce gene Z; feed gene Z plus a curated gene-feature matrix (pathway membership + co-expression + PPI) to PoPS LASSO regression. Per-gene priority scores are produced; per-locus relative ranking is informative.
python pops.py \
--gene_annot gene_annot.txt \
--feature_mat PoPS_features_full.txt \
--num_feature_chunks 10 \
--magma_prefix gene_step \
--out pops_out
PoPS is biology-agnostic; the feature matrix encodes biology. Bias in the features (e.g. cancer-pathway-heavy gene sets for a non-cancer trait) propagates to the output; verify feature coverage matches the trait.
Multi-Evidence Integration: Concordance Scoring
Goal: Combine fine-mapping, coloc, ABC, L2G, PoPS, and distance into a per-locus per-gene concordance score; flag high-confidence candidates.
Approach: Per-locus, gather evidence per candidate gene from each method; score each evidence stream as pass / fail at the canonical threshold; sum the passing streams; report >= 3 passing as high-confidence.
library(dplyr)
candidates <- read.table('locus_candidates.tsv', header = TRUE, sep = '\t')
candidates <- candidates %>%
mutate(
pass_finemap = pip_top_variant > 0.5 & credible_set_purity > 0.5,
pass_coloc = coloc_pph4 >= 0.7,
pass_distance = distance_to_tss <= 100000,
pass_pops = pops_decile_rank == 1,
pass_l2g = l2g_score >= 0.5,
pass_abc = abc_score >= 0.02 | encode_re2g_score >= 0.5,
concordance = pass_finemap + pass_coloc + pass_distance +
pass_pops + pass_l2g + pass_abc,
confidence_tier = case_when(
concordance >= 5 ~ 'near_certain',
concordance >= 4 ~ 'strong',
concordance >= 3 ~ 'high',
concordance >= 2 ~ 'suggestive',
TRUE ~ 'associational_only'))
candidates %>%
filter(concordance >= 3) %>%
arrange(desc(concordance), desc(l2g_score)) %>%
select(locus, gene, concordance, confidence_tier, l2g_score, pops_decile_rank, coloc_pph4)
Concordance scoring is conservative; some real causal genes score 2-of-6 because not all evidence streams are available at all loci. Report the per-stream availability alongside the concordance score so readers know whether failure reflects negative evidence or absent evidence.
Reconciliation: When Methods Disagree
| Pattern | Likely cause | Action |
|---|
| L2G top gene != nearest gene | Distal regulation; L2G integrates fine-mapping + coloc + chromatin | Trust L2G; verify with ABC / ENCODE-rE2G if epigenome data exists |
| L2G top gene != PoPS top gene | Orthogonal methods; one is locus-feature-based, one is similarity-based | Both valid signals; concordance is high-confidence, discordance is investigate-further |
| MAGMA top gene different from L2G | MAGMA is window-based; L2G integrates distal regulation | MAGMA is a baseline; L2G is the more comprehensive scorer |
| Two genes both pass L2G >= 0.5 at the locus | Multi-effector locus or LD-tied co-regulated genes | Run FUSION --joint or coloc.susie for independence; functional validation needed |
| L2G high, no eQTL coloc | Driver may be a coding variant or chromatin-mediated regulation absent from eQTL panel | Check VEP for coding consequence; check pQTL panels (Sun 2018 Nature; UKB-PPP) |
| FUMA top gene != Open Targets L2G top gene | Different feature weighting and FUMA web-platform version may lag OT pipeline | Both informative; document which version of each |
| ABC predicts gene A, eQTL coloc predicts gene B | Cell-type mismatch in epigenome panel vs eQTL panel | Match cell type; if not possible, prefer the panel matched to causal tissue (per LDSC-SEG) |
| All methods agree | Strong concordance | Report as high-confidence; consider for CRISPRi validation |
| All methods fail at this locus | No causal gene resolvable from current data | Report as unresolved; flag for matched-tissue eQTL or epigenome data |
Operational rule: Concordance across L2G + PoPS + (coloc OR ABC) is the publication-grade triangulation standard. Single-method calls are weak; require >= 3 of 6 orthogonal evidence streams. Disagreement between L2G and PoPS at a locus often points to (a) a multi-effector locus, (b) a method-feature artefact, or (c) genuine biological complexity. Report both, with their per-locus ranks.
Common Errors
| Error / symptom | Cause | Solution |
|---|
MAGMA error --gene-loc file required | Path mismatch or wrong reference build | Provide hg19 or hg38 gene location file matching the GWAS build |
| All MAGMA genes show p ~ 1 | LD reference panel mismatch (ancestry or sample size) | Use 1000G EUR g1000_eur reference for EUR GWAS; verify with --gene-results summary |
| Open Targets API returns empty | Study not in the OT release OR wrong study ID format | Verify study ID via OT study search; some studies require GCST prefix |
| PoPS output has all genes scoring near 0 | Feature matrix mis-aligned to gene_annot OR MAGMA gene Z scale wrong | Verify column ordering in feature matrix; check MAGMA genes.raw parsing |
| cS2G gene allocation differs from L2G | Different aggregation strategies; cS2G heritability-calibrated, L2G classifier-trained | Both informative; cS2G is a per-SNP aggregator, L2G is per-(locus, gene) |
| ABC predicts a passenger gene | Wrong cell-type Hi-C or H3K27ac in ABC input | Verify cell-type-matched epigenome; cross-reference atac-seq/enhancer-gene-linking |
| FUMA SNP2GENE job stuck | Web platform queue OR exceeded GWAS size limit | Re-submit; reduce sumstats to genome-wide-significant loci if oversize |
| L2G high at HLA region | Method is not designed for long-range LD | Exclude HLA from genome-wide V2G summaries; report separately |
| Multiple candidate genes at locus, no clear winner | Multi-effector or LD-tied co-regulation | Allow multi-gene reporting; functional validation needed |
| PoPS top gene is a passenger | Feature matrix bias (pathway over-representation) | Inspect PoPS coefficients; verify feature relevance to trait |
Tool Install Notes
- MAGMA: Pre-compiled binary from ctglab.nl/software/magma. Linux / Mac / Windows. Ships as
magma CLI; needs PLINK bfile reference (e.g. 1000G g1000_eur).
- FUMA: Web platform at fuma.ctglab.nl/snp2gene. No local install. Requires user account; SNP2GENE jobs run server-side with current reference annotations.
- Open Targets Platform (current): GraphQL at
api.platform.opentargets.org/api/v4/graphql. Query L2G via credibleSet(studyLocusId) -> l2GPredictions { target, score, shap }. Recommended for new pipelines.
- Open Targets Genetics (legacy, deprecated): GraphQL at
api.genetics.opentargets.org/graphql. Python pip install opentargets-genetics (community wrapper) OR direct GraphQL queries via requests. Genetics Portal was consolidated into the integrated Open Targets Platform in 2024; legacy endpoint still responds but new work should target the Platform.
- PoPS:
git clone https://github.com/FinucaneLab/pops. Python; ships with feature matrix download instructions. Pre-built feature matrix at the releases page.
- cS2G: Pre-computed gene scores downloadable from alkesgroup.broadinstitute.org/cS2G/. No install; lookup table.
- DEPICT:
git clone https://github.com/perslab/depict. Java + Python; legacy method, see Pers 2015.
- FLAMES / Funmap2: Recent (Lake 2024); check the publication's GitHub for the current install path.
- INQUISIT: Originally for breast cancer (Fachal 2020 Nat Genet 52:56); see the paper's supplementary methods for adaptation to other traits.
- ABC:
git clone https://github.com/broadinstitute/ABC-Enhancer-Gene-Prediction. Python; see atac-seq/enhancer-gene-linking for the full pipeline.
- ENCODE-rE2G:
git clone https://github.com/EngreitzLab/ENCODE_rE2G. Snakemake; see atac-seq/enhancer-gene-linking.
Anticipated Reviewer Pushback
| Pushback | Standard response |
|---|
| "Was the nearest gene just taken?" | No. L2G + PoPS concordance reported per locus; ABC / ENCODE-rE2G applied when matched epigenome exists. Nearest-gene flagged as low-confidence fallback only. |
| "Was L2G + PoPS concordance tried?" | Yes. Both scores reported per (locus, gene) candidate; multi-stream concordance score (>= 3 of 6 streams) gates high-confidence calls. |
| "Was the eQTL panel tissue-relevant?" | Causal tissue identified via stratified LDSC / LDSC-SEG; TWAS run in that tissue; cross-tissue check via S-MultiXcan. |
| "Was ABC / ENCODE-rE2G applied?" | Applied when matched ATAC + H3K27ac (+ Hi-C optional) available; otherwise flagged as limitation. Cross-reference atac-seq/enhancer-gene-linking. |
| "Was CRISPRi-FlowFISH validation considered?" | Cross-referenced against Fulco 2019 K562 catalog (~5,000 pairs); Gasperini 2019 at-scale catalog (~75,000 pairs); Schraivogel 2020 multi-cell-type catalog for non-K562 cells. |
| "What MAGMA window was used?" | Window stated explicitly. FUMA 35+10 vs MAGMA-native 0+0 distinction made; sensitivity over 0+0, 35+10, 50+50 reported for high-stakes loci. |
References
- Mountjoy E, Schmidt EM, Carmona M, Schwartzentruber J, Peat G et al 2021 Nat Genet 53:1527 (Open Targets L2G; locus-to-gene integrative scorer)
- Ghoussaini M, Mountjoy E, Carmona M, Peat G, Schmidt EM et al 2021 Nat Genet 53:1530 (Open Targets V2G features)
- de Leeuw CA, Mooij JM, Heskes T, Posthuma D 2015 PLoS Comput Biol 11:e1004219 (MAGMA gene-based association)
- Watanabe K, Taskesen E, van Bochoven A, Posthuma D 2017 Nat Commun 8:1826 (FUMA SNP2GENE integrative annotation)
- Gazal S, Weissbrod O, Hormozdiari F, Dey KK, Nasser J et al 2022 Nat Genet 54:827 (cS2G combined SNP-to-gene)
- Weeks EM, Ulirsch JC, Cheng NY, Trippe BL, Fine RS et al 2023 Nat Genet 55:1267 (PoPS Polygenic Priority Score)
- Fulco CP, Nasser J, Jones TR, Munson G, Bergman DT et al 2019 Nat Genet 51:1664 (ABC enhancer-gene linking; CRISPRi-FlowFISH validation)
- Nasser J, Bergman DT, Fulco CP, Guckelberger P, Doughty BR et al 2021 Nature 593:238 (ABC genome-wide application)
- ENCODE Project Consortium 2024 (ENCODE-rE2G)
- Pers TH, Karjalainen JM, Chan Y, Westra HJ, Wood AR et al 2015 Nat Commun 6:5890 (DEPICT)
- Fachal L, Aschard H, Beesley J, Barnes DR, Allen J et al 2020 Nat Genet 52:56 (INQUISIT breast-cancer V2G)
- Finucane HK, Reshef YA, Anttila V, Slowikowski K, Gusev A et al 2018 Nat Genet 50:621 (LDSC-SEG tissue prioritisation)
- Yazar S, Alquicira-Hernandez J, Wing K, Senabouth A, Gordon MG et al 2022 Science 376:eabf3041 (OneK1K sc-eQTL)
- Stacey D, Fauman EB, Ziemek D, Sun BB, Harshfield EL et al 2019 Nat Commun 10:4502 (target gene assignment from GWAS)
- Sun BB, Maranville JC, Peters JE, Stacey D, Staley JR et al 2018 Nature 558:73 (pQTL panel)
- Vosa U, Claringbould A, Westra HJ, Bonder MJ, Deelen P et al 2021 Nat Genet 53:1300 (eQTLGen reference)
- Mancuso N, Freund MK, Johnson R, Shi H, Kichaev G et al 2019 Nat Genet 51:675 (FOCUS for gene-level fine-mapping; cross-reference TWAS skill)
- Schaid DJ, Chen W, Larson NB 2018 Nat Rev Genet 19:491 (fine-mapping review)
- Barbeira AN, Pividori M, Zheng J, Wheeler HE, Nicolae DL, Im HK 2019 PLoS Genet 15:e1007889 (S-MultiXcan; joint per-tissue TWAS via PC decomposition)
- Hu Y, Li M, Lu Q, Weng H, Wang J et al 2019 Nat Genet 51:568 (UTMOST; cross-tissue weight imputation TWAS)
- Gasperini M, Hill AJ, McFaline-Figueroa JL, Martin B, Kim S et al 2019 Cell 176:377 (at-scale CRISPRi-FlowFISH enhancer-gene screen, ~75,000 pairs)
- Schraivogel D, Gschwind AR, Milbank JH, Leonce DR, Jakob P et al 2020 Nat Methods 17:629 (multi-cell-type CRISPRi-FlowFISH catalog)
- Amemiya HM, Kundaje A, Boyle AP 2019 Sci Rep 9:9354 (ENCODE blacklist v2; HLA-region exclusion reference)
Related Skills
- causal-genomics/fine-mapping - Variant-level credible sets feeding L2G and concordance scoring
- causal-genomics/colocalization-analysis - coloc PP.H4 as one of the six evidence streams
- causal-genomics/transcriptome-wide-association - TWAS gene-level association and FOCUS fine-mapping
- causal-genomics/mendelian-randomization - cis-eQTL MR as orthogonal causal evidence
- causal-genomics/mediation-analysis - Downstream gene-mediated trait effects
- causal-genomics/proteome-mr-drug-target - pQTL-based effector-gene nomination for drug targets
- atac-seq/enhancer-gene-linking - ABC and ENCODE-rE2G enhancer-gene predictions feeding distal-regulation evidence
- atac-seq/atac-peak-calling - Generating enhancer candidates from matched-tissue ATAC
- atac-seq/deep-learning-atac - chromBPNet variant-effect prediction as 7th evidence stream for non-coding effector inference
- gene-regulatory-networks/coexpression-networks - Gene co-expression features feeding PoPS
- gene-regulatory-networks/scenic-regulons - TF-target regulons as supporting evidence at regulatory loci
- pathway-analysis/go-enrichment - Pathway context for effector-gene candidates
- population-genetics/association-testing - Upstream GWAS summary-statistic generation
- variant-calling/variant-annotation - Coding-consequence annotation for effector-gene variants
- workflows/gwas-pipeline - End-to-end GWAS pipeline producing effector-gene-prioritisation input
