소스 정보
- 저장소
- thiagofernandes1987-create/APEX
- 최근 소스 활동
- 2026년 7월 21일 11:53
- 감지된 SKILL.md 언어
- 영어
- 스타
- 2
- 포크
- 0
설치 방법
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
소스 파일 검토
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
메뉴
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
직접 명령은 검토 Prompt를 거치지 않습니다. 실행하기 전에 소스를 확인하세요.
npx skills add https://github.com/thiagofernandes1987-create/APEX --skill account-research명령은 한 줄로 유지됩니다. 복사하기 전에 가로로 스크롤해 전체 내용을 확인하세요.
로컬 사본을 원하시나요? SkillsMP에서 현재 제공할 수 있는 파일을 다운로드하세요.
Token-aware reasoning workflow with real tools: picks an operating mode to control cost, runs a structured pipeline (decompose → validate → verify → snapshot), and gives Claude Program-of-Thought, RK4/Euler, a code gate, and a safe skill router. Use when: multi-step or high-stakes tasks, real math, precise computation, audits, or the user mentions APEX, PoT, pipeline, or scientific mode.
**v00.33.0**: Ingested from antigravity-awesome-skills community repo
run multiple local CLI agents in parallel (separate tmux sessions)
SOC 직업 분류 기준
SKILL.md 표시 중
| name | account-research |
| description | "condition: CRM ou enrichment tool indisponível" |
Retrieve and synthesize account information from Common Room. Handles four interaction patterns: full overviews, targeted field questions, sparse data situations, and combined MCP data + LLM reasoning.
Before researching any account, fetch the Me object from Common Room. This provides:
Default all queries to the user's own segments unless the user explicitly asks for a broader view. This keeps results scoped to their territory.
Determine what the user actually needs before deciding how much data to fetch:
Pattern 1 — Full Overview: "Tell me about Datadog" / "Summarize cloudflare.com" → Fetch the full field set and produce a structured briefing.
Pattern 2 — Targeted Question: "Who owns the Snowflake account?" / "Is acme.io showing buying signals?" / "What's the employee count for notion.so?" → Fetch only the relevant field(s). Return a direct, concise answer — do not produce a full brief for a simple question.
Pattern 3 — Sparse Data: "Tell me about tiny-startup.io" → If Common Room has limited data for an account, say so honestly: "There is limited information available for this account." Never speculate or fill gaps with generic statements.
Pattern 4 — Combined Reasoning: Fetch structured MCP data, then layer in LLM analysis — e.g., "Stripe has 8,000 employees and is hiring heavily for AI roles. Based on your ICP of 1k–10k fintech companies, this is a strong fit."
Search Common Room for the account by domain or company name. Exact match first; if no result, try partial match and confirm with the user before proceeding.
Use the Common Room object catalog to see available field groups and their contents. For full overviews, request all field groups. For targeted questions, request only what's relevant.
Key field groups to know about:
Choosing what to fetch:
| User query type | Fields to request |
|---|---|
| Full account overview | All field groups |
| "Who owns this account?" | Company profiles & links, CRM fields |
| "Is this company a good fit?" | Key fields, scores, about |
| "What signals is this account showing?" | Scores, summary research, CRM fields |
| "Who are the top contacts?" | Top contacts |
| "What does RoomieAI say about them?" | Summary research, all research |
| "Find engineers at this account" | Prospects (with title filter) |
Common Room is the primary data source. Do not run web search when CR returns rich data.
When CR data is sparse (Pattern 3 — few fields returned, no activity, no scores), run a targeted web search to fill gaps:
"[company name]" news — scoped to the last 30 daysIf the user explicitly asks for external context or recent news, run web search regardless of data richness.
When the user's question invites synthesis — not just data retrieval — layer in analysis:
When the user's company context is available (see references/my-company-context.md), position findings relative to the user's value proposition and ICP.
Only include sections where Common Room returned actual data. Omit sections entirely rather than filling them with guesses.
Full overview (when data is rich):
## [Company Name] — Account Overview
**Snapshot**
[2–3 sentences: what they do, plan/stage, relationship status]
**Key Details**
[Employee count, industry, location, domain, funding — from key fields]
**CRM & Ownership** [If CRM fields returned]
[Owner, opp stage, ARR]
**Scores** [If scores returned]
[All available scores as raw values or percentiles]
**Signal Highlights** [If activity/signals exist]
[3–5 most important signals with dates]
**Top Contacts** [If contacts returned]
[Name | Title | Score — top 5 sorted by score desc]
**RoomieAI Research** [If summary research is non-null]
[Summary research output; list all available research topic names]
**Recommended Next Steps**
[2–3 specific, signal-backed actions]
Targeted question: 1–3 sentence direct answer. No full brief needed.
Sparse data (few fields returned, most sections would be empty):
## [Company Name] — Account Overview (Limited Data)
**Data available:** [List exactly what Common Room returned]
[Present only the returned fields]
**Web Search**
[Findings from web search — or "No significant recent news found"]
**Note:** Common Room has limited data on this account. The account may need enrichment in Common Room.
references/signals-guide.md — signal type taxonomy and interpretation guideTrack —
Use this skill when the task requires account research capabilities.