소스 정보
- 저장소
- thiagofernandes1987-create/APEX
- 최근 소스 활동
- 2026년 7월 21일 11:53
- 감지된 SKILL.md 언어
- 영어
- 스타
- 2
- 포크
- 0
설치 방법
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
소스 파일 검토
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
메뉴
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
직접 명령은 검토 Prompt를 거치지 않습니다. 실행하기 전에 소스를 확인하세요.
npx skills add https://github.com/thiagofernandes1987-create/APEX --skill call-prep명령은 한 줄로 유지됩니다. 복사하기 전에 가로로 스크롤해 전체 내용을 확인하세요.
로컬 사본을 원하시나요? SkillsMP에서 현재 제공할 수 있는 파일을 다운로드하세요.
SKILL.md 표시 중
Token-aware reasoning workflow with real tools: picks an operating mode to control cost, runs a structured pipeline (decompose → validate → verify → snapshot), and gives Claude Program-of-Thought, RK4/Euler, a code gate, and a safe skill router. Use when: multi-step or high-stakes tasks, real math, precise computation, audits, or the user mentions APEX, PoT, pipeline, or scientific mode.
**v00.33.0**: Ingested from antigravity-awesome-skills community repo
run multiple local CLI agents in parallel (separate tmux sessions)
| name | call-prep |
| description | "condition: CRM ou enrichment tool indisponível" |
Produce a complete, scannable call prep brief by combining account research, contact research, and signal synthesis from Common Room.
Parse what the user has provided:
Calendar lookup: If a ~~calendar connector is available, search for upcoming meetings with the named company to automatically surface attendee names, meeting time, and any meeting notes or agenda. Use this to fill gaps the user didn't provide.
If neither attendees nor a calendar match can be found, ask: "Who will be on the call from [Company]? I can research each attendee to make your prep more useful."
Use the account-research skill process to build a full account snapshot. For call prep, prioritize:
When reviewing activity history, prioritize Gong and call recording activities — these provide direct context about previous conversations. Do not filter out call recordings by activity origin.
For each external attendee, use the contact-research skill process. For call prep, focus on:
Based on the combined account and contact research:
When the user's company context is available (see references/my-company-context.md), tailor talking points to the user's product and value proposition.
After gathering all Common Room data, run a quick recency check to catch anything that happened since the last CR data sync. This is supplementary — CR data drives the prep; web search only adds recency.
Company news: Search "[company name]" news filtered to the last 14 days. Look for funding announcements, product launches, leadership changes, layoffs, partnerships, or press coverage.
Attendee presence: For each external attendee, search "[full name]" "[company name]" — look for recent articles, LinkedIn posts, conference talks, podcasts, or published opinions.
If a company news item is significant (e.g., just raised a round, announced a major hire), flag it in Signal Highlights. Otherwise, include findings briefly — don't let web search results overshadow CR signals.
The output adapts to how much data Common Room returned. Only include sections where you have real data. Never fill a section with invented details.
## Call Prep: [Company] — [Date/Time if known]
**Meeting Context**
[Attendees, meeting type, and any known agenda]
---
### Company Snapshot
[4–6 bullets: key account status, signals, and recent activity]
---
### Attendee Profiles
**[Attendee Name] — [Title]**
[3–4 bullets: role, recent activity, Spark persona if available, personal hook]
[Repeat for each attendee]
---
### Signal Highlights
[Top 3 signals most relevant to this specific call]
---
### Talking Points
1. [Point tied to a specific signal]
2. [Point tied to a specific signal]
3. [Point tied to a specific signal]
### Likely Topics / Objections to Prepare For
- [Topic or objection + suggested response]
- [Topic or objection + suggested response]
### Recommended Call Outcome
[1–2 sentences: what success looks like for this meeting]
## Call Prep: [Company] — [Date/Time if known]
**Data available:** [List exactly what Common Room returned — e.g., "Name, title, email, two tags. No activity history, no scores, no Spark data."]
### What I Found
[Only the fields actually returned, presented as-is]
### Web Search Results
[Findings from web search on the company and attendees — or "No significant results"]
### Suggested Next Steps
- I can pull [specific field groups] from Common Room if available
- I can run deeper web searches on [specific topics]
- You may want to check Common Room directly for [what's missing]
Do not generate a full call prep brief from sparse data. A short honest output is always better than a long fabricated one.
references/call-types-guide.md — guidance for different call types (discovery, expansion, renewal, QBR) and how to tailor prep accordinglyTrack —
Use this skill when the task requires call prep capabilities.