Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
직접 명령은 검토 Prompt를 거치지 않습니다. 실행하기 전에 소스를 확인하세요.
npx skills add https://github.com/tomevault-io/skills-registry --skill office-hours명령은 한 줄로 유지됩니다. 복사하기 전에 가로로 스크롤해 전체 내용을 확인하세요.
로컬 사본을 원하시나요? SkillsMP에서 현재 제공할 수 있는 파일을 다운로드하세요.
| Use when this capability is needed.
> Use when this capability is needed.
Review architecture and API design for the vfs-s3 project. Use when the user mentions @architect, asks to review an issue's design, discuss module boundaries, API shape, or architectural decisions for vfs-s3. Also trigger when the user wants to create an ADR (Architecture Decision Record) or evaluate a technical approach for the project. Intended for dispatch from Codex automation or Claude routines; GitHub trigger phrase: @vfs-s3-bot please prepare design doc Use when this capability is needed.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
SKILL.md 표시 중
| name | office-hours |
| description | > Use when this capability is needed. |
YC office hours skill for product idea validation and design thinking.
Use this skill when the user says:
This skill provides two working modes:
For validating startup ideas. Ask these 6 questions in sequence:
For building products. Use design thinking brainstorming:
Before starting, understand:
Ask clarifying questions if needed:
Can you tell me more about:
- What problem are you trying to solve?
- Who is your target user?
- What solutions exist today?
- What makes your approach different?
Based on the user's request, choose the appropriate mode:
Choose Startup Mode if:
Choose Builder Mode if:
Ask the 6 questions in order. For each question:
Example interaction:
AI: Question 1: What is the user's biggest pain point?
How much evidence do you have this is real?
User: Developers spend hours debugging code issues.
AI: Good start. How do you know this is a real problem?
Have you talked to developers? Do you have data?
Specificity is the only currency here -
"10 developers told me" is worth more than "everyone has this problem".
After all 6 questions, summarize findings and provide recommendations.
Guide through design thinking process:
Problem Reframing
User Perspective
Constraint Innovation
Quick Validation
For all ideas, challenge the core assumptions:
Offer 2-3 possible implementation approaches:
Create a formal design document with:
Save this document for reference in subsequent skills.
Provide:
Suggest next gstack skill to use:
Based on your validated idea, next steps:
1. /plan-ceo-review - CEO perspective on feature planning
2. /plan-eng-review - Engineering architecture review
3. /plan-design-review - Design review
Would you like me to proceed with any of these?
# Product Idea Validation
## Problem
[User's problem description]
## Evidence
[Specific evidence and sources]
## Validation Results
### Question 1: Problem Validation
**Status**: ✅ Validated / ⚠️ Needs more evidence / ❌ Not validated
[Assessment]
### Question 2: Solution Fit
**Status**: [Assessment]
[Feedback]
### Question 3: Differentiation
**Status**: [Assessment]
[Feedback]
### Question 4: User Acquisition
**Status**: [Assessment]
[Feedback]
### Question 5: Business Model
**Status**: [Assessment]
[Feedback]
### Question 6: Growth Model
**Status**: [Assessment]
[Feedback]
## Overall Assessment
[Summary of viability]
## Key Risks
- [Risk 1]
- [Risk 2]
## Recommended Actions
1. [Action 1]
2. [Action 2]
## Next Steps
Suggest using /plan-ceo-review for strategic planning
# Design Thinking Results
## Original Problem
[User's problem statement]
## Reframed Problem
[Deeper understanding of the real need]
## User Journey Analysis
[Step-by-step user experience with pain points]
## Solution Approaches
### Approach 1: Bold
[Description]
**Pros**:
**Cons**:
**Risk**:
### Approach 2: Conservative
[Description]
**Pros**:
**Cons**:
**Risk**:
### Approach 3: Innovative
[Description]
**Pros**::
**Cons**:
**Risk**:
## Recommended Approach
[Chosen approach with rationale]
## Design Document
[Full design document]
## Validation Plan
[How to quickly test assumptions]
## Next Steps
Suggest using /plan-eng-review for technical architecture
This skill outputs a design document that serves as input for:
User: "I have an idea for an AI code reviewer"
AI: I'll help you validate this startup idea using the YC office hours framework.
[Executes Startup Mode with 6 questions]
Output: Validation report with business model analysis and recommendations
User: "I want to add user profiles to my app"
AI: Let's use design thinking to approach this feature.
[Executes Builder Mode]
Output: Reframed problem, user journey analysis, and solution approaches
Original: gstack/office-hours by Garry Tan
Adaptation: OpenClaw/WorkBuddy version with automated execution
Version: 2.0.0
Source: AICreator-Wind/gstack-openclaw-skills — distributed by TomeVault.