| name | collaborative-editing |
| description | Collaborative editing enables multiple users to edit same document simultaneously. Use when this capability is needed. |
| metadata | {"author":"amnadtaowsoam"} |
Collaborative Editing
Skill Profile
(Select at least one profile to enable specific modules)
Overview
Collaborative editing enables multiple users to edit same document simultaneously. This guide covers Operational Transformation, CRDTs, and implementation with Yjs for building real-time collaborative editors that handle concurrent edits without conflicts.
Why This Matters
- Conflict Resolution: CRDTs and OT handle concurrent edits automatically
- User Experience: Real-time collaboration improves productivity
- Scalability: Efficient synchronization for multiple users
- Data Integrity: Prevents data loss from conflicting edits
Core Concepts & Rules
1. Core Principles
- Follow established patterns and conventions
- Maintain consistency across codebase
- Document decisions and trade-offs
2. Implementation Guidelines
- Start with the simplest viable solution
- Iterate based on feedback and requirements
- Test thoroughly before deployment
Inputs / Outputs / Contracts
- Inputs:
- Document ID
- User authentication token
- User information (name, color)
- Initial document content
- Entry Conditions:
- WebSocket server running
- Document persistence configured
- Authentication system in place
- Frontend editor component ready
- Outputs:
- Real-time document synchronization
- User presence indicators
- Cursor position sharing
- Document persistence
- Artifacts Required (Deliverables):
- Yjs document configuration
- WebSocket server setup
- TipTap editor integration
- Document persistence service
- Acceptance Evidence:
- Multiple users can edit simultaneously
- Conflicts resolved automatically
- User presence displayed correctly
- Document saved and restored
- Success Criteria:
- Sync latency < 100ms
- Conflict resolution 100% accurate
- Support 10+ concurrent users
- Document recovery after disconnection
Skill Composition
- Depends on: WebSocket Patterns (
34-real-time-features/websocket-patterns/), Presence Detection (34-real-time-features/presence-detection/)
- Compatible with: Live Notifications (
34-real-time-features/live-notifications/), Real-time Dashboard (34-real-time-features/real-time-dashboard/)
- Conflicts with: None
- Related Skills: presence-detection, server-sent-events
Quick Start / Implementation Example
- Review requirements and constraints
- Set up development environment
- Implement core functionality following patterns
- Write tests for critical paths
- Run tests and fix issues
- Document any deviations or decisions
def example_function():
pass
Assumptions / Constraints / Non-goals
- Assumptions:
- Development environment is properly configured
- Required dependencies are available
- Team has basic understanding of domain
- Constraints:
- Must follow existing codebase conventions
- Time and resource limitations
- Compatibility requirements
- Non-goals:
- This skill does not cover edge cases outside scope
- Not a replacement for formal training
Compatibility & Prerequisites
- Supported Versions:
- Python 3.8+
- Node.js 16+
- Modern browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge)
- Required AI Tools:
- Code editor (VS Code recommended)
- Testing framework appropriate for language
- Version control (Git)
- Dependencies:
- Language-specific package manager
- Build tools
- Testing libraries
- Environment Setup:
.env.example keys: API_KEY, DATABASE_URL (no values)
Test Scenario Matrix (QA Strategy)
| Type | Focus Area | Required Scenarios / Mocks |
|---|
| Unit | Core Logic | Must cover primary logic and at least 3 edge/error cases. Target minimum 80% coverage |
| Integration | DB / API | All external API calls or database connections must be mocked during unit tests |
| E2E | User Journey | Critical user flows to test |
| Performance | Latency / Load | Benchmark requirements |
| Security | Vuln / Auth | SAST/DAST or dependency audit |
| Frontend | UX / A11y | Accessibility checklist (WCAG), Performance Budget (Lighthouse score) |
Technical Guardrails & Security Threat Model
1. Security & Privacy (Threat Model)
- Top Threats: Injection attacks, authentication bypass, data exposure
2. Performance & Resources
3. Architecture & Scalability
4. Observability & Reliability
Agent Directives & Error Recovery
(ข้อกำหนดสำหรับ AI Agent ในการคิดและแก้ปัญหาเมื่อเกิดข้อผิดพลาด)
- Thinking Process: Analyze root cause before fixing. Do not brute-force.
- Fallback Strategy: Stop after 3 failed test attempts. Output root cause and ask for human intervention/clarification.
- Self-Review: Check against Guardrails & Anti-patterns before finalizing.
- Output Constraints: Output ONLY the modified code block. Do not explain unless asked.
Definition of Done (DoD) Checklist
Anti-patterns / Pitfalls
- ⛔ Don't: Log PII, catch-all exception, N+1 queries
- ⚠️ Watch out for: Common symptoms and quick fixes
- 💡 Instead: Use proper error handling, pagination, and logging
Reference Links & Examples
- Internal documentation and examples
- Official documentation and best practices
- Community resources and discussions
Versioning & Changelog
- Version: 1.0.0
- Changelog:
- 2026-02-22: Initial version with complete template structure
Converted and distributed by TomeVault — claim your Tome and manage your conversions.