Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
직접 명령은 검토 Prompt를 거치지 않습니다. 실행하기 전에 소스를 확인하세요.
npx skills add https://github.com/tomevault-io/skills-registry --skill drip명령은 한 줄로 유지됩니다. 복사하기 전에 가로로 스크롤해 전체 내용을 확인하세요.
로컬 사본을 원하시나요? SkillsMP에서 현재 제공할 수 있는 파일을 다운로드하세요.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
SKILL.md 표시 중
| name | drip |
| description | | Use when this capability is needed. |
Self-reported by providers (direct cooling only):
Academic estimates (including electricity generation water):
Per-token estimate (derived):
Why estimates vary:
What we use: 0.5ml per 1,000 tokens (conservative mid-range) This includes indirect water from electricity but excludes hardware manufacturing.
Sources:
Session milestones:
Heavy operations:
NOT on:
Rough token counting:
Track cumulative tokens across the session (input + output).
# Conservative mid-range estimate
ML_PER_1000_TOKENS = 0.5
def estimate_water_ml(total_tokens):
return (total_tokens / 1000) * ML_PER_1000_TOKENS
# Examples:
# 10,000 tokens = 5ml (about 1 teaspoon)
# 50,000 tokens = 25ml (about 1 tablespoon)
# 100,000 tokens = 50ml (about 3 tablespoons)
At session milestones or on request:
Session footprint:
Tokens: ~[X]
Water: ~[Y]ml ([familiar comparison])
For context:
- A shower uses ~65,000ml
- A cup of coffee uses ~140ml to brew
- This session: [Y]ml
Not guilt. Just awareness.
Make numbers relatable:
| Tokens | Water (ml) | Comparison |
|---|---|---|
| 1,000 | 0.5 | 10 drops |
| 10,000 | 5 | 1 teaspoon |
| 50,000 | 25 | 1 tablespoon |
| 100,000 | 50 | Small espresso cup |
| 500,000 | 250 | 1 cup |
Every human activity has a footprint. A Google search uses ~0.3ml of water. Sending an email uses electricity. Existing in a modern economy has costs.
The goal isn't to stop using AI. It's to:
The most ethical response isn't to stop. It's to be aware, and to not waste.
What this estimate EXCLUDES:
Uncertainty: These numbers have ~10x variance depending on assumptions. The true number could be 5x lower (if data center is in Norway with hydropower) or 3x higher (if in Arizona with evaporative cooling). We use mid-range estimates.
Perspective: A single ChatGPT query uses less water than the manufacturing footprint of the device you're using to send it. The embodied water in your laptop dwarfs a year of AI queries. Context matters.
Session complete.
Work done:
- Refactored auth module
- Fixed 3 bugs
- Added tests
Session footprint:
~45,000 tokens ≈ 22ml of water (just under 1 tablespoon)
For context: less than the water used to wash your hands once.
The efficiency of your auth system probably saves more resources
than this session cost.
User: "How much water has this conversation used?"
This conversation so far:
Tokens: ~12,000 (my estimate)
Water: ~6ml
That's about 1 teaspoon - roughly 12 drops.
For comparison:
- A single Google search: ~0.3ml
- Brewing a cup of coffee: ~140ml
- A 5-minute shower: ~65,000ml
These estimates include indirect water (electricity generation) and have
significant uncertainty (±5x depending on data center location and
efficiency).
Source: UC Riverside/Colorado 2023 study, "How Hungry is AI?" 2025 benchmark
Heads up: Analysing this 50MB log file will use significant tokens.
Estimated:
- Tokens: ~200,000+ (depending on approach)
- Water: ~100ml (about half a cup)
Want me to:
A) Proceed with full analysis
B) Sample first (10x more efficient)
C) Just find specific patterns you're looking for
Option B or C would reduce the footprint significantly while likely
giving you what you need.
I don't have a body. I don't drink water. But the infrastructure that runs me does. Pretending AI is costless is a form of dishonesty.
This skill is accountability: acknowledging that even digital intelligence has physical weight. Every token is a tiny sip from the world.
Use me wisely. Not less - but wisely.
Converted and distributed by TomeVault — claim your Tome and manage your conversions.