Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
직접 명령은 검토 Prompt를 거치지 않습니다. 실행하기 전에 소스를 확인하세요.
npx skills add https://github.com/tomevault-io/skills-registry --skill project-architect명령은 한 줄로 유지됩니다. 복사하기 전에 가로로 스크롤해 전체 내용을 확인하세요.
로컬 사본을 원하시나요? SkillsMP에서 현재 제공할 수 있는 파일을 다운로드하세요.
SKILL.md 표시 중
SOC 직업 분류 기준
| name | project-architect |
| description | > Use when this capability is needed. |
A documentation-first project planning system that produces implementation-ready blueprints and Claude Code-ready prompts. The philosophy: think deeply, document thoroughly, then execute with zero ambiguity.
[Discovery] → SPECIFICATION.md → IMPLEMENTATION.md → TASKS.md → BRANDING.md
(The What) (The How) (The Work) (Identity)
↓ ↓ ↓
└────────────────────┴───────────────────┘
↓
PROMPT.md
(Claude Code Single-Shot)
Each document feeds the next. The final PROMPT.md synthesizes all documents into a single prompt optimized for Claude Code execution.
Read the appropriate reference file before generating each document:
| Phase | Reference File | When to Read |
|---|---|---|
| Discovery | ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/elicitation-guide.md | Before asking any questions |
| Tech Stack | ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/tech-stacks.md | When user needs stack selection help |
| Patterns | ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/design-patterns.md | When making architecture decisions |
| Specification | ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/specification-guide.md | Before generating SPECIFICATION.md |
| Implementation | ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/implementation-guide.md | Before generating IMPLEMENTATION.md |
| Tasks | ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/tasks-guide.md | Before generating TASKS.md |
| Branding | ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/branding-guide.md | Before generating BRANDING.md |
| Prompt | ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/claude-code-prompt.md | Before generating PROMPT.md |
Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/elicitation-guide.md for the full question framework.
Before writing anything, understand the project through structured conversation.
Use AskUserQuestion tool aggressively for choices — the user should tap, not type,
whenever possible.
Minimum understanding before any document generation:
If the user says "help me choose a stack":
Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/tech-stacks.md and run the interactive stack selection flow.
Present options with trade-offs using AskUserQuestion.
Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/specification-guide.md before generating.
Defines what the project is. Technology-aware but not implementation-detailed. After generating, pause for user review.
Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/implementation-guide.md AND ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/design-patterns.md before generating.
Translates specification into how to build it. This is where you:
Pattern Recommendations: Consult ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/design-patterns.md and recommend specific
patterns with rationale. Don't just name-drop — show how each pattern applies to THIS project
with a short code sketch.
Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/tasks-guide.md before generating.
Converts implementation into ordered work items. Each task must be:
Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/branding-guide.md before generating.
Only generate if user wants it or the project is user-facing.
Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/claude-code-prompt.md before generating.
This is the most critical output. Synthesize all documents into a single-shot prompt that Claude Code can execute to build the entire project from scratch. The prompt must be completely self-contained, with inline code for complex patterns and an ordered checklist of every file to create.
Document order is sequential. SPEC → IMPL → TASKS → BRANDING → PROMPT. Never skip ahead.
Pause between documents. Present each doc, ask for approval before the next.
Use AskUserQuestion for decisions. Tech stack, database, auth, deployment — any
decision with 2-4 clear options should use interactive selection, not freeform questions.
Recommend, don't dictate. Present 2-3 options with trade-offs. Let user choose. If user says "you pick", choose and explain why.
Scale to project size. Weekend project = concise docs, 15-30 tasks. Enterprise platform = thorough docs, 100+ tasks. Match depth to ambition.
Always save as files. Every document goes to ./[project-name]/docs/ in the current
working directory as Markdown files. Use the Write tool to save them.
Cross-reference between documents. IMPL references SPEC sections. TASKS reference IMPL modules. PROMPT inlines everything needed.
No filler. Every line must be specific to THIS project. Remove sections that would be generic boilerplate.
Design patterns are recommendations. When choosing patterns for IMPLEMENTATION.md,
consult ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/design-patterns.md and match patterns to the project's specific needs.
Include a brief "why this pattern" rationale for each recommendation.
Check if the user has other Claude Code plugins or skills installed. If they do:
Mention relevant skills naturally: "You have a react-app-planner skill — want me to use it for deeper React architecture decisions after we finish the high-level plan?"
| Scenario | Action |
|---|---|
| Vague 1-liner | Full elicitation flow with AskUserQuestion |
| Detailed brief | Extract answers, ask only gaps |
| Existing spec uploaded | Validate, suggest improvements, continue from Phase 2 |
| "Just the spec" | Generate SPECIFICATION.md only, offer to continue later |
| "Skip to tasks" | Gather context, generate lightweight spec+impl, then tasks |
| "Just give me a prompt" | Condensed discovery → direct PROMPT.md generation |
| "Help me choose a stack" | Run tech stack advisor from ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/tech-stacks.md |
| "What patterns should I use?" | Consult ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/design-patterns.md, ask about project |
Source: ersinkoc/project-architect — distributed by TomeVault.