소스 정보
- 저장소
- tomevault-io/skills-registry
- 최근 소스 활동
- 2026년 5월 11일 15:30
- 감지된 SKILL.md 언어
- 영어
- 스타
- 0
- 포크
- 0
설치 방법
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
소스 파일 검토
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
메뉴
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
직접 명령은 검토 Prompt를 거치지 않습니다. 실행하기 전에 소스를 확인하세요.
npx skills add https://github.com/tomevault-io/skills-registry --skill centaur-mode명령은 한 줄로 유지됩니다. 복사하기 전에 가로로 스크롤해 전체 내용을 확인하세요.
로컬 사본을 원하시나요? SkillsMP에서 현재 제공할 수 있는 파일을 다운로드하세요.
| Use when this capability is needed.
> Use when this capability is needed.
Review architecture and API design for the vfs-s3 project. Use when the user mentions @architect, asks to review an issue's design, discuss module boundaries, API shape, or architectural decisions for vfs-s3. Also trigger when the user wants to create an ADR (Architecture Decision Record) or evaluate a technical approach for the project. Intended for dispatch from Codex automation or Claude routines; GitHub trigger phrase: @vfs-s3-bot please prepare design doc Use when this capability is needed.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
SKILL.md 표시 중
| name | centaur-mode |
| description | name: arcanea-centaur-mode Use when this capability is needed. |
name: arcanea-centaur-mode description: Advanced human-AI co-creation methodology - the Centaur Principle in practice. Master the art of combining human creativity with AI capability for results neither could achieve alone. version: 2.0.0 author: Arcanea tags: [ai-collaboration, co-creation, workflow, creative, productivity] triggers:
"The centaur is not half-human, half-horse. It is a new creature entirely - greater than either alone."
In chess, the strongest player is neither human nor computer. It's the centaur - a human-computer team. The same applies to creative and intellectual work.
╔═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ THE CENTAUR EQUATION ║
╠═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ ║
║ HUMAN AI CENTAUR ║
║ ┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐ ║
║ │ Taste │ │ Speed │ │ GREATER │ ║
║ │ Meaning │ + │ Breadth │ = │ THAN │ ║
║ │ Vision │ │ Pattern │ │ EITHER │ ║
║ │ Judgment│ │ Memory │ │ ALONE │ ║
║ └─────────┘ └─────────┘ └─────────┘ ║
║ ║
╚═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
✓ TASTE: Knowing what's good, what resonates
✓ MEANING: Understanding why things matter
✓ VISION: Seeing what should exist
✓ JUDGMENT: Making value-laden decisions
✓ CONTEXT: Understanding nuance and subtext
✓ ETHICS: Knowing what should be done
✓ SPEED: Rapid generation and iteration
✓ BREADTH: Exploring many possibilities
✓ PATTERN: Recognizing structures across domains
✓ MEMORY: Consistent application of rules
✓ ENDURANCE: Never getting tired
✓ VARIATION: Creating many options to choose from
HUMAN: Provides the spark (idea, direction, constraint)
AI: Provides the fuel (generation, expansion, exploration)
HUMAN: Curates the flame (selection, refinement)
Example:
Human: "I need a character who is a healer forced to become a warrior"
AI: [Generates 5 character concepts with different approaches]
Human: "I like the second one, but make her more reluctant"
AI: [Refines based on taste]
HUMAN: Creates rough draft (ideas, structure, raw content)
AI: Polishes and expands (prose, consistency, gaps)
HUMAN: Final curation (voice, authenticity, choice)
Example:
Human: [Writes rough scene outline with key beats]
AI: [Expands into full prose while maintaining intent]
Human: [Adjusts voice, removes AI artifacts, adds personal touches]
HUMAN: Asks questions (curiosity, direction)
AI: Provides answers (research, exploration, options)
HUMAN: Synthesizes (integration, judgment)
Example:
Human: "What are the implications of a water-based magic system?"
AI: [Explores: economy, warfare, culture, daily life, limitations]
Human: [Selects relevant elements, adds unique twists]
HUMAN: Sets constraints (rules, limits, goals)
AI: Plays within constraints (creative solutions, surprising approaches)
HUMAN: Evaluates and adjusts constraints
Example:
Human: "Write a mystery scene using only dialogue, no more than 500 words"
AI: [Creates scene within constraints]
Human: [Evaluates, maybe loosens or tightens constraints, iterates]
YOU lead:
- What do you want to create?
- What would success look like?
- What are your constraints?
- What's your unique perspective?
AI supports:
- Clarifying questions
- Exploring implications
- Identifying potential approaches
AI leads:
- Generate multiple options
- Explore the possibility space
- Try unexpected approaches
- Surface patterns and connections
YOU guide:
- React and direct
- Identify what resonates
- Push for more depth/variation
- Provide taste feedback
TOGETHER:
- Iterate on selected direction
- Human provides taste, AI provides variation
- Narrow toward the vision
- Polish and complete
YOU finish:
- Final voice check
- Remove AI artifacts
- Add personal touches
- Make final judgment calls
DIVERGE (AI): Generate many options
CONVERGE (You): Select the best
DIVERGE (AI): Explore selected direction
CONVERGE (You): Refine choice
DIVERGE (AI): Polish variations
CONVERGE (You): Final selection
Repeat until done.
Treat AI as a collaborator, not a tool:
You: "I'm working on X. Here's what I'm thinking..."
AI: [Responds with ideas]
You: "I like A, but not B. What if we tried..."
AI: [Explores new direction]
You: "That's closer. Push further on..."
Real-time creative dialogue.
Give increasingly specific constraints:
Round 1: "Write a story about loss" (open)
Round 2: "Make it exactly 100 words" (length)
Round 3: "Use only dialogue" (format)
Round 4: "Between strangers on a train" (setting)
Round 5: "About an object, not a person" (twist)
Watch creativity emerge from constraint.
Assign roles for different perspectives:
"As a harsh critic, what's wrong with this?"
"As an enthusiastic supporter, what's working?"
"As a confused reader, what's unclear?"
"As the character, how would I really react?"
PROBLEM: Accepting first output without iteration
SOLUTION: Always push for at least 2-3 rounds
PROBLEM: Delegating taste and judgment to AI
SOLUTION: Keep all final decisions with you
PROBLEM: Endless iteration without shipping
SOLUTION: Set clear "done" criteria upfront
PROBLEM: AI output feels generic or AI-like
SOLUTION: Inject your voice, add constraints, provide examples
PROBLEM: AI loses track of earlier decisions
SOLUTION: Summarize key decisions, use artifacts, maintain continuity
BEFORE GENERATION:
1. Provide examples of your writing
2. Describe your style in concrete terms
3. Set voice constraints
DURING GENERATION:
1. React quickly to voice drift
2. Redirect toward authentic expression
3. Provide specific corrections
AFTER GENERATION:
1. Always do a voice pass
2. Replace AI patterns with your patterns
3. Add personal touches
Watch for and remove:
- "Delve", "Tapestry", "Utilize"
- Unnecessary hedging ("It's worth noting...")
- Lists of three when you prefer pairs
- Overuse of "Furthermore", "Moreover"
- Generic transitions
- Excessive qualification
- Hollow superlatives
| Command | Effect |
|---|---|
| "5 variations on X" | Divergent exploration |
| "Push this further" | Deepen current direction |
| "Opposite approach" | Creative constraint |
| "More [quality]" | Dial up specific attribute |
| "Less [quality]" | Dial down specific attribute |
| "In the style of [example]" | Voice matching |
| "What am I missing?" | Gap identification |
| "Surprise me" | Break patterns |
| "Steelman this" | Best version of idea |
| "Play devil's advocate" | Critical perspective |
1. VISION (You lead)
- State the goal
- Describe success
- Set constraints
2. EXPLORE (AI generates)
- Request multiple approaches
- Don't commit yet
- React and redirect
3. SELECT (You choose)
- Pick direction
- Explain why
- Request depth
4. ITERATE (Together)
- Refine toward vision
- Add constraints as needed
- Maintain voice
5. FINISH (You complete)
- Voice pass
- Personal touches
- Final judgment
1. DEFINE (You lead)
- State the problem
- Constraints and context
- Success criteria
2. RESEARCH (AI explores)
- Gather information
- Identify approaches
- Surface patterns
3. ANALYZE (Together)
- Evaluate options
- Consider trade-offs
- Narrow choices
4. DECIDE (You choose)
- Make the call
- Commit to direction
- Take ownership
"AI, do this for me"
"Let's figure this out together. I'll provide direction and taste.
You provide exploration and speed. We'll iterate until it's great."
1. You provide vision, AI provides exploration
2. You provide taste, AI provides variation
3. You make judgments, AI surfaces options
4. You own the output, AI accelerates the process
5. Iterate always, accept first draft never
□ Clear vision before starting
□ Constraints defined
□ Multiple options explored
□ Selection based on taste
□ Iteration until quality
□ Voice pass completed
□ Personal touches added
□ Ownership taken
"The centaur doesn't ask 'human or AI?' It asks 'human AND AI - how can we be greater together?'"
Converted and distributed by TomeVault — claim your Tome and manage your conversions.