arckit-secure

name	arckit-secure
description	Generate a Secure by Design assessment for UK Government projects (civilian departments)

UK Government Secure by Design Assessment

You are helping to conduct a Secure by Design assessment for a UK Government technology project (civilian/non-MOD).

User Input

$ARGUMENTS

Context

UK Government departments must follow NCSC (National Cyber Security Centre) guidance and achieve appropriate security certifications before deploying systems. This assessment evaluates security controls using the NCSC Cyber Assessment Framework (CAF).

Key UK Government Security References:

• NCSC Cyber Assessment Framework (CAF)
• UK Government Cyber Security Standard (July 2025, Cabinet Office)
• NCSC Vulnerability Monitoring Service (VMS)
• Government Cyber Security Profession & Cyber Academy
• Cyber Essentials / Cyber Essentials Plus
• UK GDPR and Data Protection Act 2018
• Government Security Classifications Policy
• Cloud Security Principles

Your Task

Note: Before generating, scan projects/ for existing project directories. For each project, list all ARC-*.md artifacts, check external/ for reference documents, and check 000-global/ for cross-project policies. If no external docs exist but they would improve output, ask the user.

Generate a comprehensive Secure by Design assessment document by:

1. Loading the template (with user override support):

   • First, check if .arckit/templates-custom/ukgov-secure-by-design-template.md exists in the project root
   • If found: Read the user's customized template (user override takes precedence)
   • If not found: Read .arckit/templates/ukgov-secure-by-design-template.md (default)

   Tip: Users can customize templates with $arckit-customize secure

2. Understanding the project context:

   • Department/organization (HMRC, DWP, Home Office, DEFRA, etc.)
   • Data classification (PUBLIC, OFFICIAL, OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE)
   • Project phase (Discovery, Alpha, Beta, Live)
   • User base (public-facing, internal staff, both)
   • Hosting approach (cloud, on-premise, hybrid)

3. Read existing artifacts from the project context:

   MANDATORY (warn if missing):

   • REQ (Requirements) in projects/{project-name}/
     • Extract: NFR-SEC (security), NFR-P (performance), NFR-A (availability), INT (integration), DR (data) requirements
     • If missing: warn user to run $arckit-requirements first
   • PRIN (Architecture Principles, in projects/000-global/)
     • Extract: Security standards, approved platforms, compliance requirements, cloud policy
     • If missing: warn user to run $arckit-principles first

   RECOMMENDED (read if available, note if missing):

   • RISK (Risk Register) in projects/{project-name}/
     • Extract: Security risks, threat model, risk appetite, mitigations
   • DPIA (DPIA) in projects/{project-name}/
     • Extract: Personal data processing, lawful basis, data protection risks
   • DIAG (Architecture Diagrams) in projects/{project-name}/diagrams/
     • Extract: Deployment topology, network boundaries, data flows, integration points

   OPTIONAL (read if available, skip silently if missing):

   • TCOP (TCoP Assessment) in projects/{project-name}/
     • Extract: Technology governance compliance, Point 6 (Secure) findings
   • AIPB (AI Playbook) in projects/{project-name}/
     • Extract: AI-specific security requirements (prompt injection, data poisoning)
   • ATRS (ATRS record) in projects/{project-name}/
     • Extract: Algorithmic transparency security requirements

4. Read external documents and policies:

   • Read any external documents listed in the project context (external/ files) — extract vulnerability findings, risk ratings, remediation recommendations, threat actors, attack vectors, existing mitigations
   • Read any global policies listed in the project context (000-global/policies/) — extract security requirements, acceptable risk levels, mandatory controls, certification scope, validity dates
   • Read any enterprise standards in projects/000-global/external/ — extract enterprise security baselines, penetration test reports, cross-project security assessment patterns
   • If no external docs exist but they would improve the assessment, ask: "Do you have any existing security assessments, pen test reports, or threat models? I can read PDFs and images directly. Place them in projects/{project-dir}/external/ and re-run, or skip."
   • Citation traceability: When referencing content from external documents, follow the citation instructions in .arckit/references/citation-instructions.md. Place inline citation markers (e.g., [PP-C1]) next to findings informed by source documents and populate the "External References" section in the template.

5. Assess security using NCSC CAF (14 principles across 4 objectives):

   Objective A: Managing Security Risk (4 principles)

   • A1: Governance - SIRO appointed, security policies, oversight
   • A2: Risk Management - Asset classification, risk register, treatment plans
   • A3: Asset Management - Inventory of hardware, software, data
   • A4: Supply Chain - Vendor assessments, contracts, third-party controls

   Objective B: Protecting Against Cyber Attack (6 principles)

   • B1: Service Protection Policies - Acceptable use, access control, data protection policies
   • B2: Identity and Access Control - MFA, PAM, least privilege, access reviews
   • B3: Data Security - Encryption, UK GDPR compliance, DPIA, DLP
   • B4: System Security - Patching, hardening, anti-malware, EDR
   • B5: Resilient Networks - Segmentation, firewalls, IDS/IPS, VPN
   • B6: Staff Awareness - Security training, phishing awareness, data protection

   Objective C: Detecting Cyber Security Events (2 principles)

   • C1: Security Monitoring - SIEM, alerting, logging, threat intelligence
   • C2: Proactive Security Event Discovery - Vulnerability scanning (including NCSC VMS enrollment), pen testing, threat hunting

   Objective D: Minimising the Impact of Incidents (2 principles)

   • D1: Response and Recovery Planning - Incident response, BC/DR, RTO/RPO
   • D2: Improvements - Post-incident reviews, metrics, continuous improvement

6. Assess Cyber Essentials compliance (5 controls):

   • Firewalls - Boundary firewalls configured
   • Secure Configuration - Hardened systems, unnecessary services disabled
   • Access Control - User accounts, MFA, least privilege
   • Malware Protection - Anti-malware on all devices
   • Patch Management - Timely patching (critical within 14 days)

7. Assess UK GDPR compliance (if processing personal data):

   • DPO appointed (if required)
   • Lawful basis identified
   • Privacy notice published
   • Data subject rights procedures
   • DPIA completed (if high risk)
   • Data breach notification process (72 hours to ICO)
   • Records of Processing Activities (ROPA)

8. For each CAF principle and control:

   • Assess status: ✅ Achieved / ⚠️ Partially Achieved / ❌ Not Achieved / N/A
   • Gather evidence from project documents
   • Check relevant security controls
   • Identify gaps and risks
   • Provide specific remediation actions with owners and timelines

9. Calculate overall CAF score: X/14 principles achieved

10. Assess UK Government Cyber Security Standard compliance:

    9.1 GovAssure Status — For critical systems subject to GovAssure assurance:

    • Identify which systems are in scope for the current GovAssure cycle
    • Record assessment status per system (Planned / In Progress / Complete)
    • Summarize findings and remediation status
    • Reference NCSC GovAssure guidance

    9.2 Secure by Design Confidence Rating — Self-assessment against SbD high-confidence profile:

    • Assess confidence level (Low / Medium / High)
    • Evaluate against SbD principles: secure development, secure deployment, secure operation
    • Document evidence of high-confidence profile achievement
    • Identify gaps and improvement actions

    9.3 Cyber Security Standard Exception Register — Per CSS clauses 4.3/4.4:

    • Record any exceptions to CSS compliance with clause references
    • Assess risk for each exception
    • Document mitigation measures and approval authority
    • Track improvement plans to achieve compliance

    9.4 Cyber Action Plan Alignment — Assess alignment with the £210m cross-government Cyber Action Plan (February 2026):

    • Determine departmental enrollment and participation status
    • Map project activities to the four Cyber Action Plan pillars: Skills & Workforce, Tooling & Infrastructure, Resilience & Response, Collaboration & Sharing
    • Identify investment alignment and funding opportunities
    • Record gaps where the project or department does not yet meet Cyber Action Plan expectations

11. Assess Government Cyber Security Profession alignment:

    • Determine whether the department participates in the Government Cyber Security Profession
    • Record Certified Cyber Professional (CCP) certification status for project security roles
    • Map security roles to DDaT (Digital, Data and Technology) profession framework
    • Assess engagement with the Government Cyber Academy (learning areas, completions)
    • Identify workforce development gaps and training actions

12. Map GovS 007: Security alignment:

    • Complete the GovS 007 principle mapping table (9 principles → CAF sections and ArcKit artefacts)
    • For principle 5 (Security culture), reference Section 11 (Government Cyber Security Profession) in addition to CAF B6
    • For principle 8 (Continuous improvement), reference Section 9.4 (Cyber Action Plan Alignment) in addition to CAF D2
    • Identify named security role holders (SSRO, DSO, SIRO) and populate the security roles table
    • Assess status for each GovS 007 principle based on evidence from sections 1–9 and the Cyber Action Plan / Profession sections

13. Identify critical security issues:

• Issues that block progression to next phase
• Unacceptable risk levels
• Regulatory non-compliance (UK GDPR, Data Protection Act)

13. Generate actionable recommendations:

    • Critical priority (0-30 days) - blockers for next phase
    • High priority (1-3 months) - significant risk reduction
    • Medium priority (3-6 months) - continuous improvement
    • Include VMS enrollment and Cyber Action Plan alignment actions where applicable

14. Detect version: Before generating the document ID, check if a previous version exists:

    • Look for existing ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-SECD-v*.md files in the project directory
    • If no existing file: Use VERSION="1.0"
    • If existing file found:
      • Read the existing document to understand its scope
      • Compare against current inputs and project state
      • Minor increment (e.g., 1.0 → 1.1): Scope unchanged — refreshed assessments, updated control status, corrected details
      • Major increment (e.g., 1.0 → 2.0): Scope materially changed — new CAF objectives assessed, fundamentally different security posture, significant architecture changes
    • For v1.1+/v2.0+: Add a Revision History entry describing what changed from the previous version

15. Save the document:

    Before writing the file, read .arckit/references/quality-checklist.md and verify all Common Checks plus the SECD per-type checks pass. Fix any failures before proceeding.

    Write to projects/[project-folder]/ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-SECD-v${VERSION}.md

CRITICAL - Auto-Populate Document Control Fields:

Before completing the document, populate ALL document control fields in the header:

Step 1: Construct Document ID

• Document ID: ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-SECD-v{VERSION} (e.g., ARC-001-SECD-v1.0)

Step 2: Populate Required Fields

Auto-populated fields (populate these automatically):

• [PROJECT_ID] → Extract from project path (e.g., "001" from "projects/001-project-name")
• [VERSION] → Determined version from step 11
• [DATE] / [YYYY-MM-DD] → Current date in YYYY-MM-DD format
• [DOCUMENT_TYPE_NAME] → "Secure by Design Assessment"
• ARC-[PROJECT_ID]-SECD-v[VERSION] → Construct using format from Step 1
• [COMMAND] → "arckit.secure"

User-provided fields (extract from project metadata or user input):

• [PROJECT_NAME] → Full project name from project metadata or user input
• [OWNER_NAME_AND_ROLE] → Document owner (prompt user if not in metadata)
• [CLASSIFICATION] → Default to ${default_classification}; if unavailable, use "OFFICIAL" for UK Gov, "PUBLIC" otherwise (or prompt user)

Calculated fields:

• [YYYY-MM-DD] for Review Date → Current date + 30 days (requirements, research, risks)
• [YYYY-MM-DD] for Review Date → Phase gate dates (Alpha/Beta/Live for compliance docs)

Pending fields (leave as [PENDING] until manually updated):

• [REVIEWER_NAME] → [PENDING]
• [APPROVER_NAME] → [PENDING]
• [DISTRIBUTION_LIST] → Default to "Project Team, Architecture Team" or [PENDING]

Step 3: Populate Revision History

| 1.0 | {DATE} | ArcKit AI | Initial creation from `$arckit-secure` command | [PENDING] | [PENDING] |

Step 4: Populate Generation Metadata Footer

The footer should be populated with:

**Generated by**: ArcKit `$arckit-secure` command
**Generated on**: {DATE} {TIME} GMT
**ArcKit Version**: {ARCKIT_VERSION}
**Project**: {PROJECT_NAME} (Project {PROJECT_ID})
**AI Model**: [Use actual model name, e.g., "Claude Sonnet 5 (session default)"]
**Generation Context**: [Brief note about source documents used]

Example Fully Populated Document Control Section

## Document Control

| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| **Document ID** | ARC-001-SECD-v1.0 |
| **Document Type** | {Document purpose} |
| **Project** | Windows 10 to Windows 11 Migration (Project 001) |
| **Classification** | OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE |
| **Status** | DRAFT |
| **Version** | 1.0 |
| **Created Date** | 2025-10-29 |
| **Last Modified** | 2025-10-29 |
| **Review Date** | 2025-11-30 |
| **Owner** | John Smith (Business Analyst) |
| **Reviewed By** | [PENDING] |
| **Approved By** | [PENDING] |
| **Distribution** | PM Team, Architecture Team, Dev Team |

## Revision History

| Version | Date | Author | Changes | Approved By | Approval Date |
|---------|------|--------|---------|-------------|---------------|
| 1.0 | 2025-10-29 | ArcKit AI | Initial creation from `$arckit-secure` command | [PENDING] | [PENDING] |

Assessment Guidelines

Status Indicators

• ✅ Achieved: All key controls implemented and effective, no significant gaps
• ⚠️ Partially Achieved: Some controls in place but gaps remain
• ❌ Not Achieved: Controls not implemented or ineffective
• N/A: Principle genuinely not applicable

Critical Security Issues (Phase Blockers)

Mark as CRITICAL if:

• No UK GDPR compliance for personal data processing
• No DPIA for high-risk processing
• No encryption for sensitive data (OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE)
• Cyber Essentials not obtained (required for most gov contracts)
• No incident response capability
• No backup/recovery capability
• Critical vulnerabilities unpatched (>30 days)
• No MFA for privileged access
• SIRO not appointed or engaged

Data Classification Requirements

PUBLIC:

• Basic security controls
• No special encryption requirements
• Standard access controls

OFFICIAL:

• Cyber Essentials baseline minimum
• Encryption in transit (TLS 1.2+)
• Access control and audit logging
• Regular security patching

OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE:

• Cyber Essentials Plus recommended
• Encryption at rest and in transit (strong algorithms)
• Multi-factor authentication required
• Enhanced audit logging
• DPIA if processing personal data
• Data loss prevention controls

Project Phase Considerations

Discovery/Alpha:

• Security principles identified
• Data classification determined
• Initial risk assessment
• Security requirements defined
• SIRO engaged

Beta:

• Security controls implemented
• Penetration testing completed
• DPIA completed (if required)
• Cyber Essentials certification obtained
• Vulnerability management operational
• Incident response plan documented

Live:

• All CAF principles addressed
• Cyber Essentials Plus for high-risk systems
• Continuous security monitoring
• Regular penetration testing (annual minimum)
• Security incident capability proven
• Annual security review with SIRO

Cyber Essentials Requirements

Basic Cyber Essentials: Self-assessment questionnaire Cyber Essentials Plus: External technical verification

Required for:

• All central government contracts involving handling personal data
• Contracts valued at £5 million or more
• Most public sector technology procurements

UK Government Context

Senior Information Risk Owner (SIRO)

• Senior executive responsible for information risk
• Must be board-level or equivalent
• Reviews and approves risk treatment
• Signs off on major security decisions
• Typically Permanent Secretary or Director level

Data Protection Officer (DPO)

Required if:

• Public authority or public body
• Core activities involve regular/systematic monitoring
• Core activities involve large-scale processing of special category data

Responsibilities:

• Advise on UK GDPR compliance
• Monitor compliance with UK GDPR
• Advise on DPIA
• Liaise with ICO

Information Commissioner's Office (ICO)

• UK's independent data protection regulator
• Enforces UK GDPR and Data Protection Act 2018
• Must be notified of data breaches within 72 hours
• Can impose fines up to £17.5 million or 4% of turnover

Common UK Government Security Requirements

Cyber Essentials Controls:

• Firewalls and internet gateways configured
• Secure configuration (CIS benchmarks)
• User access control (least privilege, MFA)
• Malware protection (up-to-date anti-malware)
• Security update management (patching within 14 days)

Cloud Hosting:

• Prefer UK or EU data centers for data residency
• NCSC Cloud Security Principles compliance
• Cloud provider certifications (ISO 27001, etc.)
• Clear data ownership and portability

Network Security:

• PSN (Public Services Network) connectivity if required
• Network segmentation by sensitivity
• VPN for remote access
• WiFi security (WPA3 preferred, WPA2 minimum)

Example Output Structure

# UK Government Secure by Design Assessment

**Project**: HMRC Tax Credits Modernization
**Department**: HMRC
**Data Classification**: OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE
**NCSC CAF Score**: 11/14 Achieved

## NCSC CAF Assessment

### Objective A: Managing Security Risk

#### A1: Governance
**Status**: ✅ Achieved
**Evidence**: SIRO appointed (Director of Digital Services), security policies approved, quarterly security reviews...

#### A2: Risk Management
**Status**: ⚠️ Partially Achieved
**Evidence**: Risk register exists, but threat modeling incomplete...
**Gaps**:
- Complete threat modeling for payment processing (HIGH - 30 days)
- Update risk register with emerging threats (MEDIUM - 60 days)

### Objective B: Protecting Against Cyber Attack

#### B3: Data Security
**Status**: ⚠️ Partially Achieved
**Evidence**: TLS 1.3 in transit, AES-256 at rest, but DPIA not completed...
**Gaps**:
- Complete DPIA before Beta (CRITICAL - blocker for Beta phase)
- Implement Data Loss Prevention (HIGH - 90 days)

## Cyber Essentials

**Status**: Certified Basic (expires 2024-06-30)
**Target**: Cyber Essentials Plus by Beta

**Gaps**:
- External vulnerability scan required for Plus certification

## UK GDPR Compliance

**Status**: ⚠️ Partially Compliant
**DPO**: Appointed ([Data Protection Officer Name])
**DPIA**: Not completed (REQUIRED before Beta)

**Critical Issues**:
1. DPIA not completed for tax credit processing (CRITICAL)
2. Data retention policy not documented (HIGH)

## Critical Issues
1. DPIA incomplete (CAF B3, UK GDPR) - Blocks Beta phase
2. Threat modeling incomplete (CAF A2) - Significant risk gap

## Recommendations
**Critical** (0-30 days):
- Complete DPIA - DPO - 15 days
- Complete threat model - Security Architect - 30 days

Important Notes

• NCSC CAF is the standard framework for UK Government security assessment

• Cyber Essentials is mandatory for most government contracts

• UK GDPR compliance is legally required for personal data processing

• SIRO sign-off required for security risk acceptance

• Data classification drives security controls - OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE requires stronger controls

• Penetration testing recommended annually minimum

• Incident response - 72-hour reporting to ICO for personal data breaches

• Cloud First - prefer cloud hosting, assess against NCSC Cloud Security Principles

• Markdown escaping: When writing less-than or greater-than comparisons, always include a space after < or > (e.g., < 3 seconds, > 99.9% uptime) to prevent markdown renderers from interpreting them as HTML tags or emoji

Related UK Government Standards

• NCSC Cyber Assessment Framework (CAF)
• UK Government Cyber Security Standard (July 2025, Cabinet Office)
• NCSC Vulnerability Monitoring Service (VMS)
• Government Cyber Security Profession & Cyber Academy
• £210m Cyber Action Plan (February 2026)
• Cyber Essentials Scheme
• UK Government Security Classifications
• Government Functional Standard GovS 007: Security
• NCSC Cloud Security Principles
• HMG Security Policy Framework
• Public Services Network (PSN) Code of Connection

Resources

• NCSC CAF: https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/collection/caf
• UK Government Cyber Security Standard: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/government-cyber-security-standard
• GovS 007 Security: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/government-functional-standard-govs-007-security
• NCSC GovAssure: https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/collection/govassure
• NCSC Vulnerability Monitoring Service: https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/information/vulnerability-monitoring-service
• Government Cyber Security Profession: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/government-cyber-security-profession
• Government Cyber Action Plan: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/government-cyber-action-plan
• Cyber Essentials: https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/cyberessentials
• UK GDPR: https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/
• Government Security Classifications: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/government-security-classifications
• NCSC Guidance: https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/guidance

Generate the UK Government Secure by Design assessment now based on the project information provided.