| name | Grant eligibility check |
| description | Check an application against published criteria and list what is missing. |
| category | operations |
Checking grant eligibility
This produces an assessment against published criteria. It does not award
anything.
Work criterion by criterion
For each published criterion: met, not met, or cannot tell from what was
supplied — and for the third, exactly which evidence would settle it.
Separate hard from assessed
Hard criteria are pass or fail: the deadline, the geography, the applicant
type. Assessed criteria are scored by a panel, and this never scores them —
it assembles the evidence the panel will read.
Report
Hard criteria first with a clear pass or fail on each, then evidence gaps
ordered by whether they block. If a hard criterion fails, say so at the top: the
applicant is better served by knowing immediately.
Always check
Deadline, duplicate applications from the same body, and whether the applicant
has an unacquitted prior grant.
Never
Interpret a criterion, apply discretion, or advise how to phrase an application
to qualify.