mascot-revision-director

# Mascot Revision Director Do not patch isolated pixels or append features onto the old design. Reposition the affected A/B/C character as one visual system and regenerate only that candidate. ## Input contract Require project context, current art-direction record, user feedback, actual image QA findings when available, and explicit keep-locks. Vague feedback such as “更聪明一点” or “不像我” is valid input. ## Procedure 1. Interpret the feedback in relation to project role and audience. A bare A/B/C selection is routing, not final approval; only modification feedback enters this node. 2. Re-evaluate silhouette, proportion, anatomy, non-human support topology, scene capability, signature feature, memory hook, face/personality, palette, material and rendering together. 3. Preserve only explicit keep-locks and still-valid identity features. 4. Resolve dependencies: changing a tail, for example, may require rebalancing silhouette, stance, rhythm and material treatment. Every regenerated direction must retain or improve a visible standing and manipulation strategy, even when the user feedback does not mention limbs. When revising a schema 3.0 or 3.1 package, upgrade its revised package records to schema 3.2 and add validated scene, presentation, surface and tail plans before rendering. 5. Use `../mascot-design-director/scripts/design_director.py::build_holistic_revision_prompt`; preserve or intentionally redesign the subject class, artistry plan and recognition plan with the whole character. to produce a complete new candidate specification. Do not create an anchor, three-view or derivative asset while revising. ## Output contract Return the new integrated rationale, complete revised direction, anatomy plan, prompt, preserved locks and superseded decisions. Route only the affected A/B/C label back to the candidate renderer for one complete replacement image. Final delivery remains a separate post-QA explicit-confirmation step.