knowledge-structuring

SOP for detecting and resolving concept aliases — merge duplicate pages, redirect edges.

SOP for creating a claim page in the vault — atomic proposition with type classification, source attribution, and initial confidence.

SOP for creating a new concept page with proper frontmatter, content, and initial edges.

SOP for flagging contradictions in the causal model — identify conflicting evidence or mechanism claims.

SOP for creating a dimension page — documents an axis of variation with its values and semantics.

SOP for creating multiple edges in a batch — efficient bulk relationship creation.

SOP for attaching evidence to a claim — create typed edge (supported_by, contradicts, qualifies) with evidence quality metadata.

SOP for linking evidence pages to causal claims — creates supported_by or contradicts edges.

SOP for documenting an intervention — what happens when a causal variable is manipulated.

SOP for documenting a feedback loop — classify, describe dynamics, identify break points.

SOP for creating a causal mechanism edge — documents how one variable causes changes in another.

SOP for generating research questions from promising gaps in the design space.

SOP for documenting rebuttals and counter-claims — create rebuttal pages with typed contradiction edges and source attribution.

SOP for creating a variable page in the causal model — documents a measurable quantity with its properties.

SOP wrapping vault_add_edge — create a typed relationship between two vault pages.

SOP for wiki page creation/update — create or update a synthesized wiki page with edges and index update.

SOP for auditing wikilink coverage — scans all edges and reports which source pages are missing [[dir/slug]] wikilinks to their targets.

Campaign for mapping argument structures — extract claims, link evidence, assess strength, synthesize positions. Produces argument graphs in the wiki vault.

Strategy for synthesizing argument positions — aggregate evidence, resolve contradictions, produce synthesis reports identifying which claims survive scrutiny.

SOP for generating argument structure visualization — query graph for argument chains, format as mermaid diagram or indented tree, write to vault.

Tactic for decomposing compound claims into atomic propositions — identify logical structure, separate conjunctions, extract implicit assumptions.

Strategy for extracting claims from source material — identify propositions, decompose compound claims, classify claim types, create claim pages in the vault.

Strategy for linking evidence to claims — find supporting/contradicting evidence, create typed edges, assess evidence quality, identify gaps in evidential coverage.

Tactic for assessing argument strength — evaluate evidence quality, count independent sources, check for defeaters, assign calibrated confidence scores.

SOP for assigning calibrated strength scores to claims — evaluate evidence weight, count independent sources, check defeaters, produce scored assessment.

SOP for producing argument synthesis reports — aggregate evidence, resolve contradictions, identify surviving claims, write structured summary.

Tactic for systematically extracting axes of variation from literature — identify how practitioners compare approaches.

SOP for validating that candidate axes are independent and meaningful.

SOP for systematically enumerating combinations across dimensions.

Strategy for enumerating meaningful combinations across dimensions and marking existing work.

Strategy for identifying fundamental dimensions of variation in a design space.

Campaign for mapping design spaces — discover dimensions/axes, enumerate combinations, identify gaps and novel opportunities. Produces dimensional maps in the wiki vault.

Strategy for ranking unexplored combinations by novelty, feasibility, and potential impact.

SOP for exporting the dimensional matrix as a readable document or structured data.

Tactic for generating and populating combination matrices — cross dimensions to enumerate the design space.

SOP for scoring empty cells by novelty potential — how surprising and valuable would this combination be?

SOP for tracing causal chains — follow edges from cause to effect through intermediate variables.

SOP for assigning calibrated confidence scores to causal claims based on evidence quality and quantity.

Tactic for reasoning about what would happen if variables were different — supports causal identification and intervention analysis.

Tactic for assessing the strength and relevance of evidence for causal claims — distinguishes correlation from causation.