Skip to main content

github-issues

Investigate, assess, read, draft, create, or update GitHub issues with current-state verification, value-versus-cost analysis, runtime capability discovery, and exact write boundaries.

소스 정보

저장소
z-shell/.github
최근 소스 활동
2026년 8월 31일 07:35
감지된 SKILL.md 언어
영어
스타
10
포크
5

설치 방법

기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.

소스 파일 검토

설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.

파일 탐색기
9 개 파일

SKILL.md 표시 중

SKILL.md
소스 지침 · 읽기 전용 미리보기
name
github-issues
description
Investigate, assess, read, draft, create, or update GitHub issues with current-state verification, value-versus-cost analysis, runtime capability discovery, and exact write boundaries.
# GitHub Issues Use GitHub issues as the authoritative record for active and deferred work. Project 28 is a portfolio view, and Linear is only a selective linked mirror. ## Authority boundary - Reading, searching, and drafting are read-only. - Creating or changing an issue, comment, label, assignee, milestone, issue type, relationship, project item, or status is an external write and requires explicit user authority for that exact mutation. - Do not infer write authority from a request to investigate, triage, plan, or draft. - Project membership and Linear mirroring are separate mutations. This boundary applies to every command and reference included with this skill. ## Discover capabilities Discover available MCP, app, and CLI tools at runtime. Do not assume a named server or tool is installed. For GitHub CLI, inspect the installed contract: ```sh gh --version gh issue --help gh issue <command> --help ``` Use a high-level command when the installed version supports the required field. Current GitHub CLI versions may support issue types directly through `gh issue create --type`; verify with `gh issue create --help`. Use `gh api` only for capabilities the installed high-level command does not expose. ## Investigation workflow For z-shell work, follow the routed canonical `runbooks/triage.md`. This skill owns the operational procedure, not disposition policy. 1. Resolve the issue and its live state, project fields, dependencies, and blockers. 2. Fetch the current target branch, record its exact commit, and inspect the current source instead of trusting a stale checkout. 3. Search related issues, pull requests, commits, ADRs, and accepted patterns. 4. Trace the affected implementation and its callers. Reproduce the behavior or record the evidence gap, then run the smallest meaningful checks. 5. Compare expected user, correctness, security, performance, and maintenance value with implementation cost, regression risk, and ongoing ownership. 6. Recommend exactly one disposition: implement, defer, close as completed, close as not planned, or request more information. Structure the report as: recommendation and disposition, current reality and history, confirmed finding, value versus cost, verification and evidence gaps, and the next authorized action. Investigation does not authorize a tracker write. ## Read or draft workflow 1. Resolve the owner, repository, issue number, and current state. 2. Search for an existing owner before proposing a new issue. 3. Read applicable templates, labels, issue types, and dependency context. 4. Draft the exact title and body without writing externally. 5. Report the proposed mutation and wait for explicit authority when none was provided. ## Authorized write workflow 1. Re-read the target immediately before mutation. 2. Confirm the approved fields and exclude adjacent changes. 3. Put multiline text in a temporary body file, reject literal `\\n` placeholders, and use `--body-file` or an equivalent file-input endpoint. 4. Perform only the approved write. 5. Read the stored issue or comment back and verify its exact fields and rendered line breaks. 6. Report the resulting URL. ## Pull-request issue links Closing keywords create a Development link only when the pull request targets the repository's default branch. If repository policy requires a non-default base, preserve that base and create a manual closing reference after explicit authority. Do not retarget the pull request merely to activate the keyword. A manual link does not change GitHub's default-branch requirement for closing the issue. Prefer a discovered high-level capability. If none exists, confirm the current GraphQL schema exposes `addCloseIssueReferences` with `issueId` and `pullRequestIds`, then use the issue and pull-request node IDs: ```sh gh api graphql \ -f query='mutation($issueId: ID!, $pullRequestIds: [ID!]!) { addCloseIssueReferences(input: {issueId: $issueId, pullRequestIds: $pullRequestIds}) { issue { number } } }' \ -f issueId='ISSUE_NODE_ID' \ -F 'pullRequestIds[]=PR_NODE_ID' ``` Keep the complete `pullRequestIds[]=...` field quoted in Zsh so `NOMATCH` does not reject it before `gh` runs. Read both `closedByPullRequestsReferences` on the issue and `closingIssuesReferences` on the pull request back after the mutation. Never expose tokens, use destructive issue operations without exact authority, or treat tool availability as permission. ## References Load only the reference needed for the request: - `references/templates.md`: issue body structure - `references/search.md`: search syntax - `references/issue-types.md`: issue type discovery - `references/issue-fields.md`: dates, priority, and custom fields - `references/dependencies.md`: blocking relationships - `references/sub-issues.md`: parent and child issues - `references/projects.md`: Project 28 fields and membership - `references/images.md`: authorized image attachment workflow
GitHub에서 보기