| name | dd-report |
| description | Assemble a full company due-diligence report — entity resolution, registry profile, ownership and related parties, business and industry-chain position, risk records, adverse media, and (for issuers) financial red flags. Triggers on "尽调", "尽职调查", "due diligence", "DD报告", "排查这家公司", "供应商准入", "交易对手调查". |
Company Due-Diligence Report
A structured, evidence-first DD report. Every section states what was checked, what was found, and what could not be covered.
Workflow
Step 1: Entity resolution
Resolve the exact legal entity via registry lookup (天眼查 search_companies). Confirm 统一社会信用代码/注册号, full legal name, and whether the target is the group, the listed vehicle, or a subsidiary. If multiple plausible entities exist, stop and confirm with the user. Keep the resolved company_id — the capability list in later steps requires it.
Step 2: Registry profile (登记信息 section)
Registration status, capital (认缴 vs 实缴 — label which), establishment date, legal representative, registered address, business scope, and recent registry changes (法人变更、注册资本变动、经营范围变更 — frequent changes are themselves a flag). 天眼查 get_company_basic_profile returns the aggregated picture directly (registry, contacts, tags, scale, former names) and needs no capability list; go through the capability list for get_company_registration_info and get_change_records when you need the itemised change history.
登记信息 is a section heading, not a provenance tag: every field here is [披露] with its [n]. Any ratio you derive from these fields (实缴/认缴 占比, 变更频次) is [测算], and "frequent changes suggest instability" is [推断].
Step 3: Ownership and related parties
Run the related-party-map skill's core steps: shareholders (with percentages and dates), outbound investments, brother companies, and — via 天眼查 (get_suppliers_and_customers, ) — supply-chain and funding-chain relationships. Summarize the map here; attach the full map as an appendix or separate deliverable if large.
