Conduct context-driven code reviews focusing on quality, testability, and maintainability. Use when reviewing code, providing feedback, or establishing review practices.
Instalar com Codex ou Claude Copie este prompt, cole no Codex, Claude ou outro assistente e deixe que ele revise a página da skill e instale para você.
Um comando direto ignora o prompt de revisão. Verifique a origem antes de executá-lo.
Conduct context-driven code reviews focusing on quality, testability, and maintainability. Use when reviewing code, providing feedback, or establishing review practices.
Fast feedback (< 24h) > thorough feedback
</default_to_action>
Quick Reference Card
When to Use
PR code reviews
Pair programming feedback
Establishing team review standards
Mentoring developers
Feedback Priority Levels
Level
Icon
Meaning
Action
Blocker
🔴
Bug/security/crash
Must fix before merge
Major
🟡
Logic issue/test gap
Should fix before merge
Minor
🟢
Style/naming
Nice to fix
Suggestion
💡
Alternative approach
Consider for future
Review Scope Limits
Lines Changed
Recommendation
< 200
Single review session
200-400
Review in chunks
> 400
Request PR split
What to Focus On
✅ Review
❌ Skip
Logic correctness
Formatting (use linter)
Security risks
Naming preferences
Test coverage
Architecture debates
Performance issues
Style opinions
Error handling
Trivial changes
Feedback Templates
Blocker (Must Fix)
🔴 **BLOCKER: SQL Injection Risk**
This query is vulnerable to SQL injection:
```javascript
db.query(`SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ${userId}`)
Fix: Use parameterized queries:
db.query('SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ?', [userId])
Why: User input directly in SQL allows attackers to execute arbitrary queries.
### Major (Should Fix)
```markdown
🟡 **MAJOR: Missing Error Handling**
What happens if `fetchUser()` throws? The error bubbles up unhandled.
**Suggestion:** Add try/catch with appropriate error response:
```javascript
try {
const user = await fetchUser(id);
return user;
} catch (error) {
logger.error('Failed to fetch user', { id, error });
throw new NotFoundError('User not found');
}
### Minor (Nice to Fix)
```markdown
🟢 **minor:** Variable name could be clearer
`d` doesn't convey meaning. Consider `daysSinceLastLogin`.
Suggestion (Consider)
💡 **suggestion:** Consider extracting this to a helper
This validation logic appears in 3 places. A `validateEmail()` helper would reduce duplication. Not blocking, but might be worth a follow-up PR.
Prioritize feedback: 🔴 Blocker → 🟡 Major → 🟢 Minor → 💡 Suggestion. Focus on bugs and security, not style. Ask questions, don't command. Review < 400 lines at a time. Fast feedback (< 24h) beats thorough feedback.
With Agents: Agents automate security, performance, and coverage checks, freeing human reviewers to focus on logic and design. Use agents for consistent, fast initial review.
