RL in vision-language models improves inference-time alignment between vision and reasoning in mid-to-late layers, not vision ability or reasoning separately. Strategic layer freezing enables diagnosis of which components contribute to RL gains.
Instalar com Codex ou Claude Copie este prompt, cole no Codex, Claude ou outro assistente e deixe que ele revise a página da skill e instale para você.
Um comando direto ignora o prompt de revisão. Verifique a origem antes de executá-lo.
RL in vision-language models improves inference-time alignment between vision and reasoning in mid-to-late layers, not vision ability or reasoning separately. Strategic layer freezing enables diagnosis of which components contribute to RL gains.
What RL Improves for Visual Reasoning: Frankenstein-Style Analysis
Problem Context
Benchmark scores alone mask what RL actually improves in multimodal models. Standard supervised fine-tuning and RL finetuning both show improvements, but it's unclear whether RL enhances vision understanding, reasoning capability, or something else. Fine-grained evaluation reveals vision and reasoning abilities don't improve monotonically through the Base→SFT→RL pipeline. Understanding RL's true contribution requires beyond-benchmark analysis.
Core Concept
Through systematic "Frankenstein-style" analysis (mixing layers from different model variants), the paper discovers that RL doesn't uniformly enhance vision or reasoning, but rather improves alignment between them. Specifically:
RL induces consistent inference-time shift in mid-to-late transformer layers
This shift increases attention from reasoning tokens to visual tokens
The shift is concentrated, affecting fewer parameter directions than SFT
The shift is necessary and sufficient for RL gains (shown via layer freezing)
This insight reveals RL's true function: optimizing coordination between vision and reasoning subsystems rather than improving individual capabilities.
Architecture Overview
Layer-Wise Analysis: Decompose model into blocks, probe each layer's contribution
Frankenstein Merging: Mix layers from Base, SFT, and RL models systematically
Reasoning ability doesn't improve monotonically: Same for reasoning
Alignment improves consistently: Vision-to-reasoning coordination improves across pipeline
Mid-to-late concentration: RL changes concentrated in middle and late layers, early layers unchanged
Less diverse refinements: RL uses fewer parameter directions than SFT
Diagnostic workflow:
Run Frankenstein analysis to identify critical layers
Analyze attention patterns in mid-to-late layers
Perform parameter direction analysis to measure optimization focus
Run layer freezing to validate findings
Apply insights to selective training (freeze early layers, fine-tune mid-late)
Expected insights:
10-30% of layers account for most RL gains
Vision-to-reasoning attention increases 2-5× in critical layers
RL parameter updates use 30-50% fewer dominant directions than SFT
Layer freezing reveals 3-5 critical layers per model family
Transfer properties:
Layer changes often transfer between model families (e.g., ViT→ConvNeXt)
Attention pattern changes generalize well
Parameter direction insights less transferable
Reference
Frankenstein-style analysis reveals that RL improves multimodal models primarily through optimizing coordination between vision and reasoning components, particularly in mid-to-late layers. This insight enables more targeted training and better understanding of what RL actually contributes to model performance.