summarize-delivery

name

summarize-delivery

description

Close the loop after an `assign-to-workforce` run by turning what actually happened into an accountability artifact — planned versus actual delivery, mid-work decisions, plan drift, evidence-backed delivery claims, and remaining work. The plan the user confirmed is the contract; this skill records where execution obeyed it, where it changed, and what is genuinely safe to claim as delivered. Runs on complete, partial, AND failed runs — failure is reported faithfully, never smoothed over. Use when the user says "summarize delivery", "delivery summary", "wrap up", "close the loop", "what did we actually ship", or "plan versus actual", or after `assign-to-workforce` merges (or fails to merge) a plan's waves. Authored and maintained in agentculture/devague (origin = devague); guildmaster pulls this skill from here and broadcasts it to the AgentCulture mesh — it is NOT vendored from guildmaster like the inbound skills here.

summarize-delivery — turn a workforce run into an accountability artifact

The skill is named summarize-delivery; it is the delivery-side closure leg that closes the devague method's six-leg flow:

scope -> think -> spec-to-plan -> assign-to-workforce -> deviate -> summarize-delivery

It runs after the sibling assign-to-workforce skill has executed (or attempted to execute) a converged plan — and after any deviate records that run produced, since deviate slots in between assign-to-workforce and this skill, recording approved mid-run departures the moment they happen during the fan-out. Where assign-to-workforce takes the plan to delivery, this skill summarizes that delivery: it separates what was planned from what was actually delivered, records the mid-work decisions and plan drift the execution produced — quoting deviate's approved dN records as the recorded ground truth wherever they cover an item — states delivery claims with evidence and confidence, and names the remaining work.

The plan the user confirmed is a contract, not a fiction. Agents make mid-work decisions, hit constraints, cut scope, and produce delivery claims that were never in the plan. Until now the flow had no wrap-up leg to record any of it. This skill is that leg: the summary records where execution obeyed the contract, where it changed, and what is actually safe to claim as delivered.

It is not a polite progress report and not a restatement of the plan. It is an accountability artifact — auditable by a human who never watched the run.

The three readers

Write for exactly these three, and no one who was present for the execution:

1. The operator (main agent) closing a workforce run — assembling the ground truth of what merged, what failed, and what still needs doing.
2. The human owner at the final PR gate — who uses the artifact as the review map: every delivery claim traces to a plan task or an explicit drift entry, so the plan-versus-actual comparison is mechanical, not rhetorical.
3. Any later reader who needs to know what actually shipped without replaying the execution transcript. The artifact is committed and self-contained; nothing in it depends on unrecorded memory of the run.

Method-only — no script, no CLI verb

This is a method-only skill (v1), modelled on scope at its birth: a SKILL.md with an output template and no entry-point script, no new CLI verb. The deterministic devague CLI surface is unchanged — Devague never spawns agents, marks tasks done, gates merges (assign-to-workforce owns the TDD gate), or mutates delivery state. The CLI stays deterministic and non-orchestrating (issue #20); the summary is agent-side work. A future devague delivery engine — a third structural peer with a delivery store and a deterministic no-overclaim gate — is parked as follow-up, deferred until dogfooding the method shows machine state is needed.

Because there is no script, this skill invokes the read-only devague moves directly (if devague isn't on your PATH: uv tool install devague).

How to run in qwen

The read-only moves run through the devague CLI — the same agent-agnostic commands for any agent or operator (if devague isn't on PATH: uv tool install devague). Qwen Code has no curated tool allow-list: show, status, summary, deviate --list, plan show, plan waves, and scope --list all run directly through the shell tool (run_shell_command), and the operator runs the same commands directly in a terminal. This skill never mutates devague state, so none of its moves needs a user-only decision. The artifact itself is written with Qwen Code's normal file tools.

The method

1. Establish the planned-work baseline — verbatim, starting from the skeleton. Run devague summary [--plan <slug>] [--json] first. It renders the eight-section template pre-filled, verbatim, from the plan's tasks, the plan's live source frame, and the delivery (deviation) store — with <fill: ...> placeholders standing in for everything execution-dependent (run status, per-task delivery status, evidence, delivery claims). Continue filling in that skeleton rather than retyping it from scratch — fewer transcription errors, same verbatim-baseline rule. Fall back to hand-assembly when devague summary isn't available at all — the verb is missing (an older devague predates the command) or the underlying state it needs can't be read (no current plan, or a delivery record written by a newer devague) — by reconstructing the baseline read-only via `devague plan show [--json]` and `devague plan waves --json`, the same enriched payload assign-to-workforce fans out, keyed by task id with each task's summary, instruction, acceptance_criteria, and covers. If no plan state exists at all, degrade further still (see "Degrading when there is no plan state"). Whichever path was taken, say so in the artifact's baseline: line — one of `devague summary skeleton`, `devague plan (hand-assembled)`, or `git+PR history (no plan state)`. Quote task ids and summaries verbatim into the Planned Work section either way — mirroring the verbatim-brief rule in assign-to-workforce. Drift is then measured against the contract the user confirmed, never against a paraphrase.
2. Establish actual delivery. Reconcile the baseline against what merged: the merged branches, commits, and PRs of the run. Every plan task must be accounted for as delivered / partial / dropped / blocked, keyed by task id — 100 %, no silent omissions.
3. Record mid-work decisions. Every constraint discovered, scope cut, or choice made during execution that was not in the plan.
4. Classify drift against the plan. Any plan task whose delivery differs from its contract becomes a drift entry — exhaustive relative to the plan, never silently normalized. Each entry names the plan item it diverges from, the reason, and exactly one classification: acceptable / risky / .

The eight-section template

Fill this in verbatim — all eight sections, in this order. Every section stays writable for a partial or failed run; nothing here requires all waves merged, and there is no completion precondition (a run that merged zero waves is still a valid input).

# Delivery Summary — <plan title>

plan: `<slug>` · run: `<complete | partial | failed>` · date: `<created-date>`
baseline: `<devague summary skeleton | devague plan (hand-assembled) | git+PR history (no plan state)>`

## Intent

<One paragraph: what this run set out to deliver, and the plan it executed.>

## Planned Work

<The plan's tasks, quoted VERBATIM from the `devague summary` skeleton (or,
when hand-assembling, `devague plan waves --json`) — task id and summary,
never paraphrased. When no plan state exists, quote the / 
    >

  — 
  — 
 ...





| Plan task | Status | What actually landed |
|-----------|--------|----------------------|
|  | delivered |  |
|  | partial |  |
|  | blocked |  |





  —  — 
  — 





| Plan item | Reason for divergence | Classification |
|-----------|-----------------------|----------------|
|  () |  | needs-follow-up |
|  |  | risky |





 tests:  — 
 lint:  — 
 commits: 
 PRs / issues: <#NN, ...>





| Claim | Confidence | Evidence |
|-------|------------|----------|
|  | high | commit  / file  |
|  | medium | PR  · test  |
|  | unverified | (no evidence — not claimed done) |





  — 

Delivery Claims — the row contract

Every Delivery Claims row carries three fields:

• Claim — the specific thing asserted as delivered.
• Confidence — exactly one of high / medium / low / unverified.
• Evidence — at least one resolvable pointer, or the explicit unverified marker. A resolvable pointer is one a reader can follow: a commit SHA that exists, a file path that is present, a PR or issue number that is real, or a test node id that ran. "It works" is not evidence.

Drift From Plan — the entry contract

Every Drift From Plan entry names three things:

• The plan item it diverges from (by task id, quoted from the plan).
• The reason for the divergence.
• Exactly one classification: acceptable (a defensible deviation), risky (may cause a problem; flag it), or needs-follow-up (leaves work the plan assumed done).

When a delivery store exists and an approved devague deviate record covers the item, cite it by its dN id and inherit its reason and classification verbatim — the record is the recorded ground truth, not something this skill re-derives. An item no record covers still gets an entry here, worked out the same way as before.

Degrading when there is no plan state

The summary is producible from durable inputs — plan state, git history, PR links, test output — and never depends on unrecorded memory of the run. There are three tiers, most to least mechanical, and the artifact's baseline: line names which one applied:

1. devague summary skeleton — the plan (and, if any, its delivery record) can both be read; the render is fully mechanical. baseline: devague summary skeleton.
2. Hand-assembly — devague summary isn't available (the verb is missing, or the state it needs can't be read) but the plan itself can still be read: reconstruct the baseline read-only via devague plan show [--json] and devague plan waves --json. baseline: devague plan (hand-assembled).
3. Git + PR history — no devague plan state exists at all: degrade to git history and PR history as the planned-work baseline. baseline: git+PR history (no plan state).

Whichever tier applied, SAY SO in the artifact (in the baseline: line and the Planned Work section). The delivery summary is still a valid accountability artifact either way; it just names its baseline honestly instead of pretending a more mechanical path was used.

The only devague moves this skill uses — all read-only

This skill never mutates devague state. The complete set of devague moves it documents is read-only:

Move	What it reads
devague summary [--pr] [--json]	The eight-section delivery-summary skeleton (or condensed --pr skeleton), pre-filled verbatim from the plan's tasks, its live source frame, and the delivery (deviation) store — the primary planned-work baseline (Method step 1).
devague deviate --list [--json]	Every recorded deviation, read back by dN id — the source Drift From Plan and Mid-work Decisions quote. Recording or confirming a deviation is deviate's job, never this skill's.
devague plan show [--json]	The plan's tasks, acceptance criteria, dependencies — the hand-assembly fallback when devague summary (or the state it needs) is unavailable.
devague plan waves --json	The wave batches + per-task summary / instruction / acceptance_criteria / covers, keyed by id — the hand-assembly fallback's verbatim planned-work baseline.
devague scope --list [--json]	Recorded scope-exploration findings, if the frame carried any.
devague show [--json]	A frame / plan rendered for reading.
devague status [--json]	Where a frame stands (read-only next-move helper).

No other devague command appears in this method. Producing a delivery summary leaves .devague/ byte-identical (issue #20).

Hard rules (do not violate)

These are the point of the method — a delivery summary must be trustworthy.

• No overclaiming. A delivery claim without evidence is marked unverified, never asserted as done. The unverified marker survives into the committed artifact; no downstream step upgrades a claim's confidence without new evidence.
• Partial and failed runs are valid inputs. There is no completion precondition — a run that merged zero waves is still a valid input. Failure is reported faithfully: it appears under Drift and Remaining Work with its cause, and no delivery claim says "done". No section ever becomes unwritable.
• Verification is read-only. You may run the test suite, the linters, and git log to substantiate a claim before writing it. Verification never mutates code or state. A claim you cannot verify stays unverified.
• No devague state mutation. The only devague moves this skill uses are the read-only summary, deviate --list, plan show, plan waves, scope --list, show, and status (see the table above). deviate --list is read-only — recording or confirming a deviation belongs to deviate, never this skill. Never run a mutating devague command, and never run devague plan inside a task worktree to "mark a task done" — that is assign-to-workforce's boundary too (#20).
• Account for 100 % of plan tasks. Every plan task appears in Actual Delivery as delivered / partial / dropped / blocked — no silent omissions. Both the task count and the claim-evidence coverage are checkable by inspecting the artifact alone, with no hidden context.
• Quote the plan verbatim. Planned Work quotes task ids and summaries verbatim from the devague summary skeleton (or devague plan waves --json when hand-assembling). Drift is measured against the confirmed contract, not a reworded version of it.

Worked example

A partial run: three tasks were planned; t1 merged cleanly, t2 merged after an approved mid-run deviation, and t3 failed its post-merge TDD gate and was reverted. Every section is still writable — nothing about the failure makes the artifact unproducible.

# 1. Establish the planned-work baseline — read-only, quoted verbatim.
devague summary                # -> pre-filled eight-section skeleton, keyed by
                               #     task id, `<fill: ...>` placeholders for
                               #     everything execution-dependent
devague deviate --list         # -> d1 (approved, acceptable): t2 dropped an
                               #     assumed flag mid-run

# 2. Establish actual delivery — read-only reconciliation.
git log --oneline main~4..main   # what merged
gh pr view 71                    # the run's PR (evidence pointers)
uv run pytest tests/test_export.py::test_widget_round_trips -q  # verify a claim

The resulting docs/deliveries/2026-07-09-widget-export.md:

# Delivery Summary — widget export

plan: `widget-export` · run: `partial` · date: `2026-07-09`
baseline: `devague summary skeleton`

## Intent

Ship the `widget export` command as three independent tasks fanned out by
/assign-to-workforce.

## Planned Work

Quoted verbatim from the `devague summary` skeleton:

- `t1` — add the `export` verb to the CLI chassis
- `t2` — implement the widget-md renderer
- `t3` — wire the convergence gate into `export`

## Actual Delivery

| Plan task | Status | What actually landed |
|-----------|--------|----------------------|
| `t1` | delivered | `export` verb registered; merged in PR `#71` |
| `t2` | delivered | renderer added at `devague/render/widget_md.py` |
| `t3` | blocked | post-merge tests failed; merge reverted |

## Mid-work Decisions

- `d1` — dropped the `--verbose` flag from `t2`'s CLI surface — the plan
  assumed it, but the renderer never needed a verbose mode (recorded via
  `deviate`, approved)
- t2 also renders an absent field as an empty line rather than filler — no
  deviation record covers this; captured here directly, matching the
  no-fabrication rule the plan assumed but did not spell out.

## Drift From Plan

| Plan item | Reason for divergence | Classification |
|-----------|-----------------------|----------------|
| `t2` (`d1`) | dropped the `--verbose` flag — the plan assumed it, but the renderer never needed a verbose mode | acceptable |
| `t3` | gate raised on an unconverged plan; reverted, not delivered | needs-follow-up |



 tests:  — pass
 tests:  — fail
 commits: 
 PRs: 



| Claim | Confidence | Evidence |
|-------|------------|----------|
| the  verb ships and round-trips | high | test  · PR  |
| the widget-md renderer exists | high | file  |
| the convergence gate blocks unconverged exports | unverified | t3 reverted — not claimed done |



  — fix the gate wiring so  passes, then
  re-run the TDD merge gate. Blocking for the feature's completeness.

Note what the failure did: it flowed into Actual Delivery (blocked), Drift (needs-follow-up), Delivery Claims (unverified), and Remaining Work — and no claim overstated it. That is the whole point.

After the summary — the final PR gate

The delivery summary is the review map for assign-to-workforce's third human gate (the final PR). Commit docs/deliveries/<created-date>-<slug>.md alongside the run's work so the reviewer can audit planned-versus-actual without replaying the transcript. This skill does not open the PR or mutate any state — it produces the artifact the human reviews.

Provenance

This is a first-party skill — its origin is agentculture/devague, the fifth in the outbound family after scope, think, spec-to-plan, and assign-to-workforce, covering the delivery-side closure leg after a plan is executed. guildmaster pulls it from here and broadcasts it to the AgentCulture mesh; because devague is upstream, it is never re-vendored back from guildmaster's re-broadcast copy. The cite, don't import policy still holds: downstream repos copy it, they don't symlink or depend on it. See docs/skill-sources.md.