Execute qualquer Skill no Manus
com um clique

Execute qualquer Skill no Manus com um clique

doc-test-alignment

Estrelas28

Forks6

Atualizado2 de junho de 2026 às 19:06

Verify that committed docs (README.md, CLAUDE.md, SKILL.md descriptions) still describe what the code and tests actually do. Use at the end of a plan, before PR creation, or when the user says "check doc-test alignment", "verify docs", or "do the docs still match the code". STUB — `scripts/check.sh` exits with a not-yet-implemented error today; the contract for what it will do lives in this file.

Instalação

Instalar com Codex ou Claude Copie este prompt, cole no Codex, Claude ou outro assistente e deixe que ele revise a página da skill e instale para você.

Executar no Manus

Fonte

agentculture

agentculture/reachy-mini-mcp

Abrir repositório GitHub Ver repositórios do creator

Download

Executar no Manus

Ocupações relacionadasSOC

Baseado na classificação ocupacional SOC

Analistas de garantia de qualidade de software e testadoresInformática e Matemática·SOC 15-1253

Explorador de arquivos

2 arquivos

SKILL.md

readonly

name	doc-test-alignment
type	command
description	Verify that committed docs (README.md, CLAUDE.md, SKILL.md descriptions) still describe what the code and tests actually do. Use at the end of a plan, before PR creation, or when the user says "check doc-test alignment", "verify docs", or "do the docs still match the code". STUB — `scripts/check.sh` exits with a not-yet-implemented error today; the contract for what it will do lives in this file.

doc-test-alignment (stub)

This skill is a stub. The real workflow is intentionally not yet implemented — the file exists so that steward verify can find it and so contributors who land here know it is on the roadmap, not forgotten.

How to run

scripts/check.sh is the entry point. Today it prints a not-yet-implemented notice and exits non-zero. When the workflow lands, the script will gate PR-readiness on the alignment contract below; until then, treat any green exit code from this script as a bug.

What it will check

The skill is the contract for four narrow alignments. README.md command examples must still execute against the current checkout and produce output that matches the surrounding prose. The "build/test/publish" command lines in CLAUDE.md must do the same. For each .claude/skills/<name>/, the SKILL.md description frontmatter must agree with what the scripts under scripts/ actually do — surfacing disagreements (e.g. SKILL.md claims the skill bumps versions but scripts/ has no bump script). And for each test, the test name should still describe the assertions the test makes — flagging drift where the name advertises a feature the assertions no longer touch.

Why it ships as a stub

Each of those four checks is independently non-trivial. Shipping a partial implementation would either silently pass when it shouldn't, or false-positive on intentional doc-vs-code differences. The right path is to land the checks one at a time, with their own tests, behind a steward verify --check doc-test-alignment flag. The parent verbs (verify, doctor) are named in the "Roadmap" section of CLAUDE.md; the broader sibling-pattern contract lives in docs/sibling-pattern.md.

What this stub guarantees today

The skill directory exists, so steward verify's skills-convention check finds the standard layout (SKILL.md + scripts/ with an entry-point).
scripts/check.sh is the entry-point script, satisfying the steward skills convention requirement that every skill ships an executable script.
This SKILL.md is the contract for what the skill will do — when the implementation lands, it must satisfy this description or the description must move first.

Mais deste repositório

mesmo repositório

ask-colleague

agentculture/reachy-mini-mcp

Ask colleague — a *different* backend/model than you (e.g. a local vLLM Qwen) — to take a scoped repo task off your plate, then fold its answer back. The point isn't a stronger model; it's a second, independent mind, and that diversity is the value: `ask-colleague review` gets a candid second opinion on a diff, `ask-colleague explore` gets a fresh read of an area, `ask-colleague write` hands off a small implementation, `ask-colleague feedback` grades a finished work item (the ROI loop), and `ask-colleague clean` reaps stale/corrupt `colleague/*` branches a crashed run left behind (which can break `git fetch`). Pilot a running work item with `monitor`/`guide`/`stop`. Reach for it REFLEXIVELY, the way you'd lean over to the teammate at the next desk — not only when asked: before you present or open a PR on a non-trivial committed diff, run `review` for a diverse second opinion; for a fresh read of an unfamiliar area whose answer is independent of your current context, run `explore`. Both are read-only — isolate

2026-07-1530

challenge

agentculture/reachy-mini-mcp

Run a risk-scaled blind-spot discovery pass over a converged, exported frame BETWEEN /think and /spec-to-plan (the seventh origin skill, third leg in flow order): pressure-test the spec through structured lenses, route every finding back through the existing deterministic moves as proposed-only content the human adjudicates, and on a clean pass record the examined lenses/surfaces and residual uncertainty — never a claim that there are no unknown unknowns. Use when the user says "challenge this spec", "blind-spot pass", "pressure-test the frame", "what are we missing", "unknown unknowns", or after /think exports and before `devague plan new`. Authored and maintained in agentculture/devague (origin = devague); guildmaster pulls this skill from here and broadcasts it to the AgentCulture mesh — it is NOT vendored from guildmaster like the inbound skills here.

2026-07-1530

deviate

agentculture/reachy-mini-mcp

Stop an in-flight assign-to-workforce run the moment execution must diverge from the confirmed plan, get explicit human approval for the divergence, and record it as a first-class, append-only deviation record via `devague deviate` before resuming — never fold a deviation silently into drift after the fact. Use when the user says "deviate from the plan", "we need to change the plan mid-run", "record a deviation", "this isn't matching the plan anymore", or when a task agent discovers the confirmed plan no longer matches reality partway through a workforce run. Authored and maintained in agentculture/devague (origin = devague); guildmaster pulls this skill from here and broadcasts it to the AgentCulture mesh — it is NOT vendored from guildmaster like the inbound skills here.

2026-07-1530

scope

agentculture/reachy-mini-mcp

Explore the scope of a vague idea BEFORE framing it into a spec (the idea→scope leg; the optional opening move ahead of /think). Survey the surfaces the idea touches — code, docs, skills, CI, sibling repos — and seed the coming Announcement Frame with boundary, non-goal, and assumption claims that cite what was actually explored (provenance, not generic disclaimers). Use when the user says "explore scope", "scope this idea", "what does this touch", "map the scope", "scope exploration", or when an idea touches an existing codebase and speccing it cold would mean guessing its boundaries. Hand off to the sibling /think skill to build the frame. Authored and maintained in agentculture/devague (origin = devague); guildmaster pulls this skill from here and broadcasts it to the AgentCulture mesh — it is NOT vendored from guildmaster like the inbound skills here.

2026-07-1530

summarize-delivery

agentculture/reachy-mini-mcp

Close the loop after an assign-to-workforce run by turning what actually happened into an accountability artifact — planned versus actual delivery, mid-work decisions, plan drift, evidence-backed delivery claims, and remaining work. The plan the user confirmed is the contract; this skill records where execution obeyed it, where it changed, and what is genuinely safe to claim as delivered. Runs on complete, partial, AND failed runs — failure is reported faithfully, never smoothed over. Use when the user says "summarize delivery", "delivery summary", "wrap up", "close the loop", "what did we actually ship", or "plan versus actual", or after assign-to-workforce merges (or fails to merge) a plan's waves. Authored and maintained in agentculture/devague (origin = devague); guildmaster pulls this skill from here and broadcasts it to the AgentCulture mesh — it is NOT vendored from guildmaster like the inbound skills here.

2026-07-1530

recall

agentculture/reachy-mini-mcp

Search the shared eidetic memory store and get back ranked, provenanced records. Drives `eidetic recall` with four search modes — exact (verbatim substring), approximate (vector/semantic), keyword (BM25 lexical), and hybrid (a weighted blend of vector+keyword, the default) — each hit carrying its text, full metadata, a relevance `score`, and a freshness `signal`. Recall passively reinforces matched records (bumps last_recall + recall_count). Shadowed and archived records are excluded by default; use --include-shadowed / --include-archived to retrieve them. The store lives at ~/.eidetic/memory (a home-dir path outside any git worktree); the wrapper defaults queries to this agent's PERSONAL, PRIVATE scope (`--scope reachy-mini-mcp --visibility private`, suffix read from culture.yaml) — matching where /remember writes — so a no-flag recall returns this agent's own private records plus the shared public pool, and Claude and the colleague backend recall each other's memories because both resolve the same suffix vi

2026-06-2330

name	doc-test-alignment
type	command
description	Verify that committed docs (README.md, CLAUDE.md, SKILL.md descriptions) still describe what the code and tests actually do. Use at the end of a plan, before PR creation, or when the user says "check doc-test alignment", "verify docs", or "do the docs still match the code". STUB — `scripts/check.sh` exits with a not-yet-implemented error today; the contract for what it will do lives in this file.

doc-test-alignment (stub)

How to run

What it will check

Why it ships as a stub

What this stub guarantees today

The skill directory exists, so steward verify's skills-convention check finds the standard layout (SKILL.md + scripts/ with an entry-point).
scripts/check.sh is the entry-point script, satisfying the steward skills convention requirement that every skill ships an executable script.
This SKILL.md is the contract for what the skill will do — when the implementation lands, it must satisfy this description or the description must move first.