thesis-excellence

# Thesis Excellence Review Orchestrate a comprehensive multi-agent review of the thesis. The argument specifies the scope. ## Scope Options - `all` — Review the entire thesis (all written chapters) - `04_methodology` / `05_results` / etc. — Review a specific chapter - `code` — Review all analysis notebooks - `pre-submit` — Full pre-submission check (everything) ## Orchestration Procedure ### Step 1: Compile Run tectonic to verify compilation: ```bash cd /Users/alessandro/Projects/Tesi/thesis && tectonic main.tex 2>&1 ``` If compilation fails, report the error and stop. ### Step 2: Determine Agents to Dispatch Based on the scope, select which agents to run: | Scope | Agents | |-------|--------| | Any `.tex` chapter | proofreader, latex-auditor, notation-checker | | Ch. 4 or Ch. 5 | + causal-inference | | Chapters with `\citet`/`\citep` | + literature-rag | | `code` scope | code-reviewer | | `all` or `pre-submit` | All agents | ### Step 3: Run Agents Use the Task tool to fork to each agent in parallel where possible. For each agent: - **proofreader**: Read the chapter(s) and produce a proofreading report - **latex-auditor**: Compile and check cross-references, citations, formatting - **notation-checker**: Check all math against the notation registry - **causal-inference**: (only for Ch. 4/5) Deep methodology review - **literature-rag**: (only for chapters with citations) Verify top claims via RAG - **code-reviewer**: (only for code scope) Review notebooks ### Step 4: Synthesize Report Combine all agent reports into a unified assessment: ``` THESIS EXCELLENCE REPORT ========================= Scope: [what was reviewed] Date: [date] COMPILATION: [PASS/FAIL] AGENT REPORTS: ├── Proofreader: [summary + issue count] ├── LaTeX Auditor: [summary + issue count] ├── Notation Checker: [summary + issue count] ├── Causal Inference: [summary + top recommendation] ├── Literature RAG: [summary + verification rate] └── Code Reviewer: [summary + issue count] QUALITY ASSESSMENT: ├── Clarity: X/10 ├── Rigor: X/10 ├── Consistency: X/10 ├── Completeness: X/10 └── Presentation: X/10 Overall: X.X/10 TOP 5 PRIORITY ACTIONS: 1. [highest priority improvement] 2. [second priority] 3. [third priority] 4. [fourth priority] 5. [fifth priority] DETAILED FINDINGS: [Include full agent reports below, organized by agent] ``` ## Important - Quality scores are ADVISORY ONLY — they never block any action - Focus the "priority actions" on items that would most improve the thesis - If an agent fails or times out, note it and continue with others - For `pre-submit` scope, be especially thorough — this is the final check before submission