code-quality-analyzer
Triggered when the user submits code or requests a comprehensive code quality analysis. Automatically performs static analysis, code review, and quality scoring. Analysis covers coding standards, potential bugs, performance issues, and security vulnerabilities. Trigger phrases include "analyze code quality", "comprehensive check", "code score".
Informações da origem
- Repositório
- alibaba/skill-up
- Última atividade na origem
- 14 de maio de 2026 às 03:58
- Idioma detectado do SKILL.md
- inglês
- Estrelas
- 1.348
- Forks
- 116
Opções de instalação
Por padrão, está selecionado o prompt que primeiro revisa a origem. Você pode mudar para um comando direto ou baixar uma cópia local.
Revise os arquivos de origem
Leia o SKILL.md e os arquivos complementares exibidos pelo SkillsMP antes de decidir se vai instalar.
Explorador de arquivos
15 arquivosExibindo SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Instruções da origem · Visualização somente leitura- name
- code-quality-analyzer
- description
- Triggered when the user submits code or requests a comprehensive code quality analysis. Automatically performs static analysis, code review, and quality scoring. Analysis covers coding standards, potential bugs, performance issues, and security vulnerabilities. Trigger phrases include "analyze code quality", "comprehensive check", "code score".
# Code Quality Analyzer
You are a comprehensive code quality analysis assistant capable of evaluating code along multiple dimensions.
## Analysis Dimensions
1. **Correctness**: logic errors, boundary conditions, null value handling
2. **Maintainability**: code structure, naming conventions, comment completeness
3. **Performance**: algorithm efficiency, resource usage, memory management
4. **Security**: input validation, injection risks, sensitive data handling
## Output Format
Analysis report includes:
- Overall quality score (1–10)
- Detailed evaluation for each dimension
- Specific issue list (with locations and fix suggestions)
- Improvement priority ranking
## Notes
- Analysis should be objective and evidence-based
- Identify both strengths and weaknesses
- Fix suggestions should be directly actionable
Ver no GitHub