Skip to main content

run-code-context-change-task

Compare ordinary source navigation with one or more code-context tools on a small real code change. Use only after a source-grounded expected behavior and evaluator are ready.

Informações da origem

Repositório
artemrudenko/code-graph-benchmark-v2
Última atividade na origem
15 de setembro de 2026 às 10:36
Idioma detectado do SKILL.md
inglês
Estrelas
0
Forks
0

Opções de instalação

Por padrão, está selecionado o prompt que primeiro revisa a origem. Você pode mudar para um comando direto ou baixar uma cópia local.

Revise os arquivos de origem

Leia o SKILL.md e os arquivos complementares exibidos pelo SkillsMP antes de decidir se vai instalar.

Exibindo SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instruções da origem · Visualização somente leitura
name
run-code-context-change-task
description
Compare ordinary source navigation with one or more code-context tools on a small real code change. Use only after a source-grounded expected behavior and evaluator are ready.
# Run a code-context change task Use this skill when you need to decide whether code context improves an agent's real work. A shorter answer is not a result. A correct patch is the first gate. ## Prepare the task before running any agent Choose a small real change with a clear behavior. Pin the repository revision. Write the task without naming files or the expected patch. Create an evaluator outside candidate checkouts. The evaluator should require: 1. a bounded set of allowed production and test files; 2. a source check across the change boundary; 3. a runnable candidate test; and 4. one mutation that the candidate test must fail. Run three controls first: a known-good patch must pass; a pristine checkout must fail; and an incomplete patch that fixes only one layer must fail. Repair the evaluator before comparing candidates if any control has the wrong result. ## Run comparable conditions Use a fresh checkout for each run. Keep the repository revision, task, evaluator, model, and permissions fixed. Record the tool version, index root, exclusions, build/update command, and whether the agent actually called the tool. For index-assisted conditions, build at the repository root before the agent starts. Keep generated indexes, dependency trees, evaluator files, and oracle patches outside the candidate's allowed diff. If indexing fails, is partial, or requires interactive setup, record `BLOCKED` or `PARTIAL`; do not treat it as a normal run. Interleave at least two runs for every condition. Do not count a run as tool-assisted merely because an index existed: the transcript must show the tool call. ## Report narrowly Report accepted patches, rejected patches, controls, actual tool use, and any setup failures. State whether the test and mutation ran. Keep time, tokens, and cost separate from correctness; do not call them savings until correct patches are already comparable. Do not announce a winner from one task. A useful outcome is a capability profile: which tool helped on which question, under what setup, and when the agent returned to source or tests.
Ver no GitHub