Skip to main content

threat-modeler

Create threat model diagrams for Android Auth features. Supports three output modes: (A) new .tm7 file for Microsoft Threat Modeling Tool, (B) add diagram to existing .tm7, (C) Markdown export with Mermaid diagram for users without TMT. Optional STRIDE threat analysis. Triggers: 'create a threat model', 'threat model for', 'add threat diagram', 'threat model diagram', 'export threat model', 'STRIDE analysis for', 'security diagram for', or any request to create or update a threat model diagram.

Ir para a instalação

Informações da origem

Repositório
AzureAD/android-complete
Última atividade na origem
1 de abril de 2026 às 20:51
Idioma detectado do SKILL.md
inglês
Estrelas
5
Forks
6

Opções de instalação

Por padrão, está selecionado o prompt que primeiro revisa a origem. Você pode mudar para um comando direto ou baixar uma cópia local.

Revise os arquivos de origem

Leia o SKILL.md e os arquivos complementares exibidos pelo SkillsMP antes de decidir se vai instalar.

Explorador de arquivos
7 arquivos

Exibindo SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instruções da origem · Visualização somente leitura
name
threat-modeler
description
Create threat model diagrams for Android Auth features. Supports three output modes: (A) new .tm7 file for Microsoft Threat Modeling Tool, (B) add diagram to existing .tm7, (C) Markdown export with Mermaid diagram for users without TMT. Optional STRIDE threat analysis. Triggers: 'create a threat model', 'threat model for', 'add threat diagram', 'threat model diagram', 'export threat model', 'STRIDE analysis for', 'security diagram for', or any request to create or update a threat model diagram.
# Threat Modeler Create threat model diagrams from feature descriptions. The AI researches the codebase to identify components, trust boundaries, and data flows, then produces a JSON spec that scripts convert to the desired output format. ## Workflow ### Step 1: Understand the Feature Research the feature using the codebase-researcher skill or subagent. Identify: - **Processes**: Components that process data (Broker, MSAL, Chrome, eSTS) - **Data stores**: Where tokens/keys are persisted - **External interactors**: Systems outside our control - **Trust boundaries**: App sandboxes, device boundary, network boundary - **Data flows**: IPC calls, HTTPS requests, token exchanges **IMPORTANT — Abstraction Level**: Model at trust-boundary and IPC-channel level, NOT at individual Activity/class level. A threat model is about security boundaries and data flows between them, not software architecture. Bad (too granular): - SwitchBrowserActivity, BrokerBrowserRedirectActivity, AuthStrategy as separate nodes Good (security-relevant): - "Broker" as one process, "System Browser" as one external interactor, with data flows showing the IPC/intent/HTTPS channels between them **Rules of thumb:** - If two components run in the same app sandbox, they're ONE process node - Individual Activities, Fragments, or classes within the same process should NOT be separate nodes - Focus on: what crosses a trust boundary? what crosses a network boundary? what touches a data store? - Keep to 3-7 nodes for typical features. More complex features may need up to 10. ### Step 2: Determine Output Mode Ask the user which mode they want (use askQuestion tool): > How would you like the threat model delivered? > - **A) New .tm7 file** — Creates a standalone file for Microsoft Threat Modeling Tool > - **B) Add to existing .tm7** — Appends a new diagram tab to your existing threat model file (provide the file path) > - **C) Markdown export** — Creates a threat-model.md with Mermaid diagram (no TMT needed). Also saves a spec.json for later .tm7 conversion ### Step 3: Build the JSON Spec Produce a JSON spec with **explicit 2D positions** for nodes and **hand-placed handles** for edges. This produces clean, professional diagrams that match hand-built TMT quality. ```json { "title": "Feature Name Flow", "nodes": [ {"id": "broker", "name": "Broker", "type": "process", "x": 380, "y": 310}, {"id": "ests", "name": "eSTS", "type": "process", "outOfScope": true, "x": 1100, "y": 200}, {"id": "browser", "name": "System Browser", "type": "external", "x": 460, "y": 650} ], "boundaries": [ {"id": "broker_sbx", "name": "Broker Sandbox", "type": "border", "contains": ["broker"]}, {"id": "device", "name": "Android Device", "type": "border", "contains": ["broker_sbx", "browser_sbx"]}, {"id": "internet", "name": "Internet Boundary", "type": "line", "line": {"x1": 920, "y1": 50, "x2": 880, "y2": 870, "hx": 870, "hy": 430}} ], "edges": [ {"from": "broker", "to": "ests", "name": "1. /authorize", "hx": 780, "hy": 85, "portSource": "North", "portTarget": "NorthWest"}, {"from": "ests", "to": "broker", "name": "2. Return token", "hx": 720, "hy": 210, "portSource": "West", "portTarget": "East"} ] } ``` #### Node Properties - **`type`**: `process` (circle), `datastore` (parallel lines), `external` (rectangle) - **`outOfScope`**: Set `true` for components we don't own — TMT skips STRIDE threat generation - **`x`, `y`**: Explicit position (top-left corner). ALWAYS provide these for 2D layout #### Edge Properties - **`hx`, `hy`**: Handle position (controls curve midpoint and label placement). ALWAYS provide these - **`portSource`, `portTarget`**: Compass direction where arrow attaches to node (North, South, East, West, NorthEast, NorthWest, SouthEast, SouthWest). ALWAYS provide these - **Naming**: Number steps sequentially (e.g., "1. Request", "2. Response") #### Boundary Types - **`"type": "border"`** — Dashed rectangle around contained nodes (app sandboxes, device boundary) - **`"type": "line"`** — Dashed diagonal line separating zones (internet/network boundary). Use this for device↔cloud separation instead of a box. Requires `"line": {"x1", "y1", "x2", "y2", "hx", "hy"}` - **Nesting**: Outer boundaries list inner boundaries in their `contains` array Save the spec to a temporary JSON file. #### Layout Design Principles Follow these principles to produce clean, readable diagrams: 1. **Hub-spoke layout**: Place the hub node (the component with most edges) near the center. Radiate spokes outward to other nodes. Do NOT place all nodes in a single row. 2. **Distribute edges around hub nodes**: For any node with 4+ edges, **use all available compass directions** for handles and ports. Each edge connected to a hub node should approach from a unique 45° sector. Plan the port allocation before writing the spec: - List all edges touching the hub node - Assign each edge a unique compass port on that node (N, NE, E, SE, S, SW, W, NW = 8 slots) - Place each handle in the quadrant corresponding to its assigned port - Example for eSTS with 8 edges: edge 2→N, edge 3→NW, edge 5→S, edge 6→E, edge 7→SE, edge 8→SW, edge 10→NE, edge 11→W - The script detects port duplication and handle clustering, logging warnings if multiple edges share the same port or cluster within a 90° sector 3. **Line boundary for internet**: Use `"type": "line"` (not a box) to separate on-device nodes from cloud/server nodes. Place the line roughly vertically at x≈900. Device nodes go left, cloud nodes go right. 4. **100×100 node size**: The script defaults to 100px nodes (matching hand-built TMT diagrams). Don't override unless needed. 5. **Hand-place every edge**: Always provide `hx`, `hy`, `portSource`, `portTarget` for each edge. Algorithmic routing produces overlapping labels. Spread parallel edges by ~80px. 6. **Port direction rule**: Each port MUST face toward the handle position. The Bézier curve exits/enters the node from the port direction, curves through the handle, and reaches the other node. If a port faces away from the handle (>90° off), the curve will loop over the node creating a crossing. The script auto-corrects bad ports, but getting them right in the spec avoids surprises. - `portSource` = compass direction from **source center** toward the handle - `portTarget` = compass direction from **target center** toward the handle - Example: if handle is at (700, 460) and target center is at (1100, 230), the handle is to the SouthWest → use `portTarget: "SouthWest"`, NOT `"North"` or `"East"` 7. **Canvas limits**: Keep all elements within ~1200×900px. TMT's visible grid area is finite (~1800×1200px) and elements beyond it are not rendered. 8. **Boundary padding**: Leave ≥60px between a node and its inner sandbox boundary. Leave ≥80px between inner and outer boundaries so their labels don't overlap. The script auto-enforces a 30px minimum gap between nested boundary edges, but placing nodes ≥80px from the canvas origin avoids the script having to push outer boundaries into negative coordinates. 9. **Edge handle placement for parallel edges**: When multiple edges connect the same pair of nodes, offset their handles by ~80-100px along the axis between the nodes. Use different compass ports (e.g., North/NorthWest for one, East/West for another) to create visually distinct curves. 10. **Edge labels clear of boundaries**: Ensure no edge handle (hx, hy) falls near a boundary's top-left corner where the boundary name label appears (~20px below the boundary's Top coordinate). 11. **Short node names**: Use concise names ("Broker", "eSTS", "System Browser") — long names clutter the diagram. ### Step 4: Ask About STRIDE Analysis Use askQuestion tool: > Would you like me to generate a STRIDE threat analysis for this diagram? > This identifies Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information Disclosure, Denial of Service, and Elevation of Privilege threats for each data flow crossing a trust boundary. If yes, generate STRIDE data. See [references/stride-guide.md](references/stride-guide.md) for patterns and common Android Auth threats. Save as a separate JSON: ```json { "spoofing": [{"threat": "...", "dataflow": "...", "mitigation": "...", "status": "Mitigated"}], "tampering": [...], "repudiation": [...], "information_disclosure": [...], "denial_of_service": [...], "elevation_of_privilege": [...] } ``` ### Step 5: Generate Output All output files go to `~/threat-models/` (create the directory if it doesn't exist). Use a descriptive filename based on the feature name (e.g., `browser-sso-threat-model.tm7`). Run the appropriate script: **Mode A** — New .tm7: ```bash node scripts/create_tm7.js --spec /tmp/spec.json --output ~/threat-models/FeatureName-ThreatModel.tm7 --template assets/template.tm7 ``` **Mode B** — Add to existing .tm7: ```bash node scripts/add_diagram.js --file /path/to/existing.tm7 --spec /tmp/spec.json ``` **Mode C** — Markdown export: ```bash node scripts/export_markdown.js --spec /tmp/spec.json --output ~/threat-models/FeatureName-threat-model.md [--stride /tmp/stride.json] ``` For Mode C, also inform the user they can convert to .tm7 later using the saved spec.json. **All modes — always generate an MD report alongside:** Regardless of the chosen mode, always also generate a Markdown report so users have a readable document with the diagram, component table, data flow table, and STRIDE analysis (if generated). For Modes A and B, run the markdown export as an additional step: ```bash node scripts/export_markdown.js --spec /tmp/spec.json --output ~/threat-models/FeatureName-threat-model.md [--stride /tmp/stride.json] ``` ### Step 6: Converting Mode C to .tm7 (on demand) If a user later asks to convert from markdown, find the `threat-model-spec.json` saved alongside and run: ```bash node scripts/create_tm7.js --spec threat-model-spec.json --output output.tm7 --template assets/template.tm7 ``` ## Script Paths All script paths are relative to this skill's directory: - `scripts/create_tm7.js` — Mode A: JSON spec → new .tm7 - `scripts/add_diagram.js` — Mode B: JSON spec → append to existing .tm7 - `scripts/export_markdown.js` — Mode C: JSON spec → Markdown + saved spec Template asset: `assets/template.tm7` (empty .tm7 with KnowledgeBase, no diagrams) ## Key Rules - **Canvas size**: Keep all elements within ~1200×900px usable area (TMT grid is ~1800×1200 but leave margin) - **Node size**: 100×100px (default). Matches hand-built TMT diagrams - **Coordinates**: All Left/Top/HandleX/HandleY must be >= 50 - **Boundary padding**: >= 60px around contained elements; >= 80px between nested boundaries. The script auto-enforces a 30px minimum gap between nested boundary edges - **Node placement**: Place innermost nodes ≥80px from canvas origin to give outer boundaries room to wrap without hitting coordinates ≤0 - **Inner boundaries** must appear before outer boundaries in XML - **Line boundaries** (internet) go in `<Lines>` section, not `<Borders>` - **Self-loop edges** need different source/target ports - **Always hand-place edges** with explicit `hx`, `hy`, `portSource`, `portTarget` — algorithmic edge routing produces overlapping labels - **Port direction**: Ports must face the handle. The script auto-corrects ports >90° off from the handle direction to prevent curves crossing over nodes - **Edge distribution on hub nodes**: For nodes with 4+ edges, assign each edge a unique compass port — the script warns on port duplication and handle clustering (3+ within 90°) - **Hub-spoke layout**: Place the most-connected node at center; never use a 1D row of nodes - **Always generate MD report**: Regardless of output mode (A/B/C), always produce a Markdown report alongside for readability - For detailed TMT XML rules, see [references/tmt-xml-format.md](references/tmt-xml-format.md)
Ver no GitHub