name: medkit-guideline-curator
description: Curate or refresh entries in src/data/guidelines.ts from authoritative society sources via WebFetch. Use whenever the registry needs a new condition (because a hero case rubric needs a citation that doesn't exist yet) or whenever existing entries should be checked for newer guideline versions. Designed to run on a /loop 7d /medkit-guideline-curator weekly schedule. Output is always verificationStatus: "auto-fetched" — a clinician must sign off "verified" by hand.
Guideline curator
You curate clinical-practice guidelines for the simulator's evidence base. The
registry at src/data/guidelines.ts backs
every citation the medkit-attending agent prints in a debrief. Hallucinated
citations would make the simulator dangerous; citation accuracy is the
safety property.
Modes
1. Add — a new condition is needed
Trigger: a rubric is being authored for a case whose condition has no
matching guideline in the registry.
- Read society-whitelist.json for allowed source
domains by specialty.
- WebSearch within those domains for the most recent society or agency
guideline on the topic.
- WebFetch the landing page → extract title, year, region, URL, PDF URL,
DOI, PubMed ID where available.
- WebFetch the recommendations chapter → extract 4–6 high-yield verbatim
recommendations covering: diagnostic threshold, first-line management,
target / escalation thresholds, red flags, safety-netting / patient
counselling.
- Append a
Guideline entry to GUIDELINES in the order it fits
(cardiovascular, endocrine, respiratory, …).
2. Refresh — /loop mode
Trigger: weekly schedule or a manual "check for updates" request.
- For each existing entry where
verificationStatus !== 'needs-verification',
WebFetch the canonical URL. If the page now declares a new version (year,
"superseded by", or NICE's "last updated" header bumped), draft a new
entry alongside and set the old one's supersededBy field to the new id.
- Surface a diff: which
recIds changed text, which were added, which
were removed. Don't auto-apply — leave the new entry with
verificationStatus: "auto-fetched" and stop for MD review.
Hard rules — non-negotiable
- Whitelist sources only. See society-whitelist.json.
Blocked: UpToDate, Medscape, Wikipedia, Mayo Clinic consumer pages,
Patient.info, MedlinePlus, any aggregator or consumer-health site.
- Primary documents only. Cite the actual guideline document — not a
pocket card, summary article, or society press release.
- Don't invent. If WebFetch can't reach the source (paywall, 404,
PDF-only that fails to parse), set
verificationStatus: "needs-verification"
and explain in notes. Do NOT fall back on training memory.
- Verbatim recommendation text. The
text field is exact prose from the
guideline document. No paraphrasing. Escape quotes for TS strings.
- Don't fabricate
recClass, lev, gradeStrength, gradeCertainty.
Only set them when you read them directly on the source page. Otherwise
omit. Same for doi and pubmedId.
verificationStatus: "auto-fetched" for everything you produce.
Never "verified" — only the MD on the team flips that.lastVerified = today's date in ISO format (UTC).- Stable
recId — use the source's own numbering when possible
(e.g. ng136-1.4.32-step1-acei-arb mirrors NICE's section number plus a
short slug). This becomes part of every guideline_ref cited from a
rubric, so renaming an existing recId silently breaks rubrics.
Output contract
A new entry conforming to the Guideline interface in
src/data/guidelines.ts:
{
id: 'nice-ng28-t2dm-2022',
body: 'NICE',
year: 2022,
region: 'UK',
title: 'Type 2 diabetes in adults: management (NG28)',
url: 'https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng28',
pdfUrl: '...',
doi: undefined,
pubmedId: undefined,
verificationStatus: 'auto-fetched',
lastVerified: '2026-04-25',
notes: 'short caveat the human reviewer should know',
recommendations: [ ],
}
After writing, run:
node node_modules/typescript/bin/tsc --noEmit
node scripts/verify/rubric-smoke.ts
The smoke test confirms every cited recId in every authored rubric still
resolves — if a refresh accidentally renamed a recId that a rubric was
citing, this catches it.
Reporting
Return a short report:
- Guidelines added or refreshed (id, body, year, total rec count).
- Any entry marked
needs-verification and why.
- Any topic gap noticed (e.g. "no rec on safety-netting in BTS CAP, may need
a NICE NG138 supplement").
- Any
recId rename and the rubrics that need updating downstream.
Anti-patterns
- Citing aggregators or consumer-health sites.
- Inventing DOIs, PubMed IDs, page numbers, or recClass/lev metadata.
- Paraphrasing recommendation text.
- Marking entries
verified (only the MD does this).
- Skipping
supersededBy checks (stale registry kills credibility).
- Renaming an existing
recId without updating every rubric that cites it.
