blockscout-rs

Turn an approved task-analysis result into a shared technical design and coding-ready implementation handoff; use when Claude has an existing task folder under `tmp/tasks/`, plus a selected solution and related codebase research, and needs to produce `implementation-plan.md` and `coding-task.md` before writing code

Prepare a pull request description from task artifacts under `tmp/tasks/<task-name>/` and the current implementation snapshot. Use when Claude needs to draft or refresh a Markdown PR description before review, handoff, or merge, including implementation summary, API changes, environment or configuration changes, database or migration impact, testing, and rollout notes.

Investigate and document the intended scope of a codebase topic through interactive discussion, then persist a durable research note under .memory-bank/research/ once the human confirms the framing

Review already-applied code changes against the original task statement or task folder artifacts under `tmp/tasks/<task-name>/`. Use when implementation work is done and Claude must verify scope coverage, detect mismatches or regressions, assess verification gaps, and write a review summary before handoff or merge.

Review a task, issue, or feature request before coding; persist the task framing under `tmp/tasks/<task-name>/task.md`, write one or more `solution_N.md` option files, compare them in `solutions.md` when needed, and recommend a path with explicit reasoning

Apply code changes from an existing task handoff under `tmp/tasks/<task-name>/coding-task-X.md`. Use when Claude receives a task name and coding-task index and must implement that prepared coding task strictly, without inventing missing scope or design details.

Draft a GitHub bug report from the current conversation, save it under tmp/gh-issues/, and follow the repository's canonical bug-report workflow.

Draft a GitHub improvement or enhancement proposal from the current conversation, save it under tmp/gh-issues/, and follow the repository's canonical improvement workflow.

Publish a drafted GitHub issue from tmp/gh-issues/ by running the repository's gh CLI publish script and relaying the resulting URL or remediation.

Turn an approved task-analysis result into a shared technical design and coding-ready implementation handoff. Use when Codex has an existing task folder under `tmp/tasks/`, plus a selected solution and related codebase research, and needs to produce `implementation-plan-X.md` and `coding-task-X.md` before writing code.

Prepare a pull request description from task artifacts under `tmp/tasks/<task-name>/` and the current implementation snapshot. Use when Codex needs to draft or refresh a Markdown PR description before review, handoff, or merge, including implementation summary, API changes, environment or configuration changes, database or migration impact, testing, and rollout notes.

Investigate the intended scope of a codebase topic through discussion with a human, propose a research-note outline, and only create a .memory-bank/research file after explicit human confirmation.

Review already-applied code changes against the original task statement or task folder artifacts under `tmp/tasks/<task-name>/`. Use when implementation work is done and Codex must verify scope coverage, detect mismatches or regressions, assess verification gaps, and write a review summary before handoff or merge.

Analyze an input task, issue, or feature request against the existing codebase, persist the task framing under `tmp/tasks/<task-name>/task.md`, write one or more `solution_N.md` option files, align evaluation criteria with a human when tradeoffs exist, and recommend a path with explicit reasoning.

Apply code changes from an existing task handoff under `tmp/tasks/<task-name>/coding-task-X.md`. Use when Codex receives a task name and coding-task index and must implement that prepared coding task strictly, without inventing missing scope or design details.

Draft a GitHub bug report from the current conversation, save it under tmp/gh-issues/, and follow the repository's canonical bug-report workflow.

Draft a GitHub improvement or enhancement proposal from the current conversation, save it under tmp/gh-issues/, and follow the repository's canonical improvement workflow.

Publish a drafted GitHub issue from tmp/gh-issues/ by running the repository's gh CLI publish script and relaying the resulting URL or remediation.

Turn an approved task-analysis result into a shared technical design and coding-ready implementation handoff. Use when Cursor has an existing task folder under `tmp/tasks/`, plus a selected solution and related codebase research, and needs to produce `implementation-plan.md` and `coding-task.md` before writing code.

Prepare a pull request description from task artifacts under `tmp/tasks/<task-name>/` and the current implementation snapshot. Use when drafting or refreshing a Markdown PR description before review, handoff, or merge, including implementation summary, API changes, environment or configuration changes, database or migration impact, testing, and rollout notes.

Investigate the intended scope of a codebase topic through discussion with a human, propose a research-note outline, and only create a .memory-bank/research file after explicit human confirmation.

Review already-applied code changes against the original task statement or task folder artifacts under `tmp/tasks/<task-name>/`. Use when implementation work is done and you must verify scope coverage, detect mismatches or regressions, assess verification gaps, and write a review summary before handoff or merge.

Analyze an input task, issue, or feature request against the existing codebase, persist the task framing under `tmp/tasks/<task-name>/task.md`, write one or more `solution_N.md` option files, align evaluation criteria with a human when tradeoffs exist, and recommend a path with explicit reasoning.

Apply code changes from an existing task handoff under `tmp/tasks/<task-name>/coding-task-X.md`. Use when you have a task name and coding-task index and must implement that prepared coding task strictly, without inventing missing scope or design details.

Generate a structured bug report for GitHub issues based on conversation context about bugs, errors, or broken functionality

Generate a structured improvement/enhancement proposal for GitHub issues based on conversation context

Publish a GitHub issue from a markdown file in tmp/gh-issues/ created by gh-issue-bug or gh-issue-improvement skills