human-machine-brainstorm

name	Human-Machine Brainstorm (人机风暴)
description	This skill should be used when the user asks to "人机风暴", "Human-Machine Brainstorm", "human storm", "ccb brainstorm", "需求对齐调度", "spec convergence", or wants a CCB-based multi-model requirement alignment loop with Codex as the dispatcher.
version	0.1.0
disable-model-invocation	true

Human-Machine Brainstorm (HMB) — CCB Dispatcher Loop

Purpose

Run a repeatable multi-model requirement alignment loop in CCB where:

• Codex acts as the dispatcher (facilitator + router).
• Claude Code acts as the scribe (single source of truth spec author).
• OpenCode (Gemini) acts as the divergent thinker (alternatives + ASCII prototypes).

Keep every round auditable by exporting per-provider context into ./.ccb/history/ and keeping the canonical spec in ./.ccb/spec/.

Hard Rules

• Treat ./.ccb/spec/overview.md as the single source of truth. Only Claude Code edits it.
• Never assume panes “share context”. Always broadcast updates explicitly.
• Enforce question IDs in this format:
  • Claude: C-Q01, C-Q02, ...
  • OpenCode: O-Q01, O-Q02, ...
• Accept user answers only in ID-addressed form (so routing is deterministic).

Quick Start (zero-friction, recommended)

This workflow is optimized for a 2×Codex setup:

• Cmd pane runs a dedicated Codex Chair (dispatcher).
• The normal Codex provider pane participates as a reviewer/solver (not just idle).

1. Create (or choose) a topic directory (recommended location: $HOME/ccb-startups/...).

   • Optional helper: bash $HOME/.codex/skills/human-machine-brainstorm/scripts/hmb-init.sh "<topic-slug>"

2. Start CCB.

   • If CCB global config enables the chair cmd pane, just run: ccb
   • Otherwise: ccb claude codex opencode cmd (fallback)

3. Talk only to the Codex Chair (cmd pane).

   • Paste the raw requirement.
   • The chair broadcasts to claude, opencode, and participant codex via ask.
   • Use the round prompt template in references/round_prompt_template.md if needed.

Round Loop (R1/R2/R3...)

Step A — Broadcast (dispatcher = Codex Chair)

Send the same “Round prompt” to:

• ask claude "<ROUND PROMPT>"
• ask opencode "<ROUND PROMPT>"
• ask codex "<ROUND PROMPT>" (participant Codex pane)

Require them to respond with:

• 10–20 numbered questions using C-Q## / O-Q## / P-Q##
• 1 ASCII diagram (flow/state/component)
• 1 short “current assumptions” list

Step B — Collect Answers (human)

Ask the human to answer in this format:

• C-Q01: ...
• C-Q02: ...
• O-Q01: ...
• P-Q01: ...

Optionally allow a shared block:

• SHARED: ... (facts that apply to both)

Step C — Route Answers (dispatcher = Codex)

Send Claude only C-* + SHARED. Send OpenCode only O-* + SHARED. Send participant Codex only P-* + SHARED.

Step D — Export Evidence (end of round)

From the cmd pane (or any shell pane) run:

• ./.ccb/bin/round-save.sh 20

This writes:

• ./.ccb/history/claude-<timestamp>.md
• ./.ccb/history/codex-<timestamp>.md
• ./.ccb/history/opencode-<timestamp>.md

Step E — Update Spec (scribe = Claude Code)

Ask Claude to update:

• ./.ccb/spec/overview.md (bump version vN)
• ./.ccb/spec/open_questions.md (close answered questions)
• ./.ccb/spec/decisions.md (record non-reversible decisions)
• ./.ccb/spec/changelog.md (vN → vN+1 diff)

Then re-run another round until all reviewers say “no blocking issues”.

Final Handoff to GPT-5.2 (new session)

Provide a clean handoff pack:

• ./.ccb/spec/overview.md
• ./.ccb/spec/decisions.md
• ./.ccb/spec/open_questions.md (should be empty or non-blocking)
• ./.ccb/spec/changelog.md

Instruct GPT-5.2 to:

• Treat the spec as authoritative
• Output an executable plan first
• Use multi-agent decomposition for implementation/testing/review