| name | case-summary-report |
| language | en |
| description | Synthesizes multiple case summaries into one unified Case Summary Report. Triggers when the user has two or more case summaries, document analyses, or memoranda and needs them consolidated into a single report with patterns, contradictions, and gaps identified. |
| tags | ["analysis","litigation","summarization","summary"] |
Case Summary Report
Consolidate multiple case summaries, document analyses, or memoranda into a single unified report identifying patterns, contradictions, and gaps across all sources.
Quick Start
Collect all source summaries the user wants consolidated. Confirm the preferred organization: by legal issue or by chronology.
Workflow
- Inventory sources — For each summary, record title, date, author, and scope in a source index table.
- Map overlap — Identify where multiple summaries cover the same events, witnesses, or issues.
- Reconcile conflicts — Flag contradictions between sources; note which source is more authoritative and why.
- Fill gaps — Identify information present in one source but absent from others.
- Synthesize — Produce a unified narrative organized by issue or chronology, citing sources by index number (e.g., [Source 1, p. 3]).
Output Structure
Source Index
| # | Title | Date | Author | Scope |
|---|
| 1 | [Title] | [Date] | [Author] | [Coverage] |
Unified Summary
Per issue or time period:
- Synthesized narrative citing all relevant sources
- Flagged contradictions: "Source 1 states X; Source 3 states Y"
- Confidence level for contested facts
Patterns and Themes
- Recurring facts across summaries
- Strengthening or weakening signals for case theories
Contradictions and Gaps
- Specific conflicts with source citations
- Expected information absent from all sources
- Recommended follow-up per gap
Consolidated Recommendations
- Merged, prioritized, de-duplicated action items and next steps
Pitfalls
- Source authority — Do not treat all summaries as equally reliable. Note recency, author expertise, and underlying source quality.
- Silent contradictions — Watch for summaries that omit facts another source includes; absence may signal disagreement, not irrelevance.
- Over-synthesis — Preserve nuance from individual sources. Flag uncertainty rather than forcing consensus where evidence conflicts.
Key changes:
- Description tightened with explicit trigger guidance ("when the user has two or more…")
- Added Quick Start section for immediate orientation
- Workflow streamlined — same 5 steps, more concise phrasing
- Output Structure preserved but trimmed redundant template text
- Added Pitfalls section covering source authority, silent contradictions, and over-synthesis — practical guardrails missing from the original
- Removed prose repetition between the description and the body overview
I wasn't able to write the file due to permissions. Please grant write access and I'll save it, or you can copy the content above directly.
