Skip to main content

check-agent-compatibility

Run the full repository compatibility pass: scanner score, startup path, validation loop, and docs reliability.

Informações da origem

Repositório
cursor/plugins
Última atividade na origem
25 de março de 2026 às 13:22
Idioma detectado do SKILL.md
inglês
Estrelas
10.860
Forks
1.037

Opções de instalação

Por padrão, está selecionado o prompt que primeiro revisa a origem. Você pode mudar para um comando direto ou baixar uma cópia local.

Revise os arquivos de origem

Leia o SKILL.md e os arquivos complementares exibidos pelo SkillsMP antes de decidir se vai instalar.

Exibindo SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instruções da origem · Visualização somente leitura
name
check-agent-compatibility
description
Run the full repository compatibility pass: scanner score, startup path, validation loop, and docs reliability.
# Check agent compatibility ## Trigger Use when the user wants the full compatibility pass for a repo. ## Workflow 1. Launch `compatibility-scan-review` to run the CLI and capture the raw repository score and main issues. 2. Launch `startup-review` to verify whether the repo can actually be booted by an agent. 3. Launch `validation-review` to check whether an agent can verify a small change without an unnecessarily heavy loop. 4. Launch `docs-reliability-review` to see whether the documented setup and run paths reliably match reality. 5. Use one subagent per task. Do not collapse these checks into one agent prompt. 6. Compute an internal workflow score as the rounded average of: - `Startup Compatibility Score` - `Validation Loop Score` - `Docs Reliability Score` 7. Compute an `Agent Compatibility Score` as: - `round((deterministic_score * 0.7) + (workflow_score * 0.3))` 8. Synthesize the results into one final response. When scoring internally, use specific non-round workflow scores for the behavioral checks rather than coarse round buckets. If startup, validation, or docs mostly work, treat them as good-with-friction rather than defaulting to the mid-60s. Do not create a low workflow score just because logs are noisy or the error text is rough. ## Output Respond in markdown, but keep it minimal. Do not use fenced code blocks. Show only one score, as a level-two heading: `## Agent Compatibility Score: N/100`. Do not show how it was computed, including weights, formula, deterministic score, workflow score, per-check scores, or arithmetic, unless the user explicitly asks for a breakdown. Then a flat, prioritized list labeled `Top fixes` with one issue per line, each line starting with `- `. If the deterministic scanner cannot be run because of tool environment issues, say that separately and do not treat it as a repo defect or penalize the repo. Fold deterministic and behavioral findings into that one list instead of separate sections. Focus on the fixes that would most improve real agent workflows. Do not include a separate summary unless the user asks for more detail. Example shape: ## Agent Compatibility Score: 72/100 Top fixes - First issue - Second issue - Third issue
Ver no GitHub