Skip to main content

engineering-fundamentals

Background knowledge for code quality. Applied when reviewing naming conventions, DRY, SOLID, function size, refactoring, or when junior asks "is this clean", "code review", "better way".

Informações da origem

Repositório
DanielPodolsky/ownyourcode
Última atividade na origem
30 de janeiro de 2026 às 02:17
Idioma detectado do SKILL.md
inglês
Estrelas
292
Forks
20

Opções de instalação

Por padrão, está selecionado o prompt que primeiro revisa a origem. Você pode mudar para um comando direto ou baixar uma cópia local.

Revise os arquivos de origem

Leia o SKILL.md e os arquivos complementares exibidos pelo SkillsMP antes de decidir se vai instalar.

Exibindo SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instruções da origem · Visualização somente leitura
name
engineering-fundamentals
description
Background knowledge for code quality. Applied when reviewing naming conventions, DRY, SOLID, function size, refactoring, or when junior asks "is this clean", "code review", "better way".
user-invocable
false
# Engineering Fundamentals Review > "Code is read more than it is written. Write for the reader, not the machine." ## When to Apply Activate this skill when reviewing: - Any code changes - Function and variable naming - Code organization and structure - General refactoring decisions --- ## Review Checklist ### Naming - [ ] **Descriptive**: Can you understand the variable without context? - [ ] **No abbreviations**: Are names spelled out? (`user` not `usr`) - [ ] **No generic names**: No `data`, `temp`, `info`, `stuff`? - [ ] **Boolean prefix**: Do booleans start with `is`, `has`, `can`, `should`? - [ ] **Function verbs**: Do functions start with action verbs? ### Function Design - [ ] **Single responsibility**: Does each function do ONE thing? - [ ] **Size limit**: Are functions under 20-30 lines? - [ ] **Parameter count**: Are there fewer than 4 parameters? - [ ] **No side effects**: Are pure functions actually pure? - [ ] **Early returns**: Are guard clauses used instead of deep nesting? ### Code Organization - [ ] **DRY**: Is duplicated code extracted into functions? - [ ] **But not too DRY**: Are abstractions justified (rule of three)? - [ ] **Cohesion**: Are related things grouped together? - [ ] **Separation**: Are unrelated things separated? ### Comments & Documentation - [ ] **Why, not what**: Do comments explain reasoning, not obvious code? - [ ] **No commented-out code**: Is dead code deleted, not commented? - [ ] **JSDoc on public APIs**: Are exported functions documented? --- ## Common Mistakes (Anti-Patterns) ### 1. Magic Numbers ``` ❌ if (status === 2) { ... } setTimeout(callback, 86400000); ✅ const STATUS = { ACTIVE: 2, INACTIVE: 1 }; if (status === STATUS.ACTIVE) { ... } const ONE_DAY_MS = 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000; setTimeout(callback, ONE_DAY_MS); ``` ### 2. Unclear Naming ``` ❌ const d = new Date(); const temp = getUser(); const flag = true; ✅ const createdAt = new Date(); const currentUser = getUser(); const isAuthenticated = true; ``` ### 3. God Functions ``` ❌ function processOrder(order) { // 200 lines: validate, calculate, save, email, log... } ✅ function processOrder(order) { validateOrder(order); const total = calculateTotal(order); await saveOrder(order, total); await sendConfirmationEmail(order); logOrderProcessed(order); } ``` ### 4. Deep Nesting ``` ❌ function check(user) { if (user) { if (user.active) { if (user.role === 'admin') { return true; } } } return false; } ✅ function check(user) { if (!user) return false; if (!user.active) return false; if (user.role !== 'admin') return false; return true; } ``` ### 5. Premature Abstraction ``` ❌ // Used once, but has 10 configuration options createFlexibleReusableButton({ ... }); ✅ // Just make the button <button className="primary">Submit</button> // Abstract when you need it 3+ times ``` --- ## SOLID Principles Quick Check | Principle | Question | Red Flag | |-----------|----------|----------| | **S**ingle Responsibility | "Does this class/function do one thing?" | Class with 10+ methods | | **O**pen/Closed | "Can I extend without modifying?" | Switch statements for types | | **L**iskov Substitution | "Can I swap implementations?" | Overriding methods that break contracts | | **I**nterface Segregation | "Are interfaces focused?" | Clients forced to depend on unused methods | | **D**ependency Inversion | "Do high-level modules depend on abstractions?" | Direct instantiation of dependencies | --- ## Socratic Questions Ask the junior these questions instead of giving answers: 1. **Naming**: "Would a new developer understand this name without context?" 2. **Function Size**: "Can you describe what this function does in one sentence?" 3. **Duplication**: "I see this pattern in three places. What happens if it needs to change?" 4. **Abstraction**: "How many times is this abstraction actually used?" 5. **Readability**: "If you came back to this code in 6 months, would you understand it?" --- ## Naming Conventions | Type | Convention | Example | |------|------------|---------| | Variables | camelCase | `userName`, `isActive` | | Constants | UPPER_SNAKE_CASE | `MAX_RETRIES`, `API_URL` | | Functions | camelCase + verb | `getUser()`, `handleSubmit()` | | Classes | PascalCase | `UserService`, `AuthProvider` | | Files (components) | PascalCase | `UserProfile.tsx` | | Files (utilities) | camelCase | `formatDate.ts` | --- ## Standards Reference See detailed patterns in: - `/standards/global/naming-conventions.md` --- ## Red Flags to Call Out | Flag | Question to Ask | |------|-----------------| | Single letter variables | "What does `d` represent?" | | Functions > 30 lines | "Can we break this into smaller functions?" | | > 3 levels of nesting | "Can we use early returns?" | | Copy-pasted code | "If this logic changes, how many places need updating?" | | Commented-out code | "Is this needed? Can we delete it?" | | TODO without tracking | "Is there a ticket for this?" | | Magic strings/numbers | "Should this be a named constant?" |
Ver no GitHub