competitive-intel

Systematic competitor tracking that feeds CMO positioning, CRO battlecards, and CPO roadmap decisions. Covers competitor identification, 8-dimension tracking, analysis frameworks, battlecard creation, win/loss analysis, and intelligence distribution. Use when analyzing competitors, building battlecards, tracking market moves, conducting win/loss analysis, updating positioning, or when user mentions competitive intelligence, competitor analysis, battlecards, win/loss, market positioning, or competitive strategy.

Ir para a instalação

Repositório: deathrashed/agents
Última atividade na origem: 17 de maio de 2026 às 07:20
Idioma detectado do SKILL.md: inglês
Estrelas: 1
Forks: 0

Opções de instalação

Por padrão, está selecionado o prompt que primeiro revisa a origem. Você pode mudar para um comando direto ou baixar uma cópia local.

Instalar com Codex ou Claude Copie este prompt, cole no Codex, Claude ou outro assistente e deixe que ele revise a página da skill e instale para você.

Um comando direto ignora o prompt de revisão. Verifique a origem antes de executá-lo.

npx skills add https://github.com/deathrashed/agents --skill competitive-intel

O comando permanece em uma só linha. Role horizontalmente para revisá-lo antes de copiar.

Prefere uma cópia local? Baixe os arquivos disponíveis atualmente no SkillsMP.

Revise os arquivos de origem

Leia o SKILL.md e os arquivos complementares exibidos pelo SkillsMP antes de decidir se vai instalar.

Explorador de arquivos

4 arquivos

SKILL.md

Instruções da origem · Visualização somente leitura

Voltar à pesquisa Voltar à instalação

name	competitive-intel
description	Systematic competitor tracking that feeds CMO positioning, CRO battlecards, and CPO roadmap decisions. Covers competitor identification, 8-dimension tracking, analysis frameworks, battlecard creation, win/loss analysis, and intelligence distribution. Use when analyzing competitors, building battlecards, tracking market moves, conducting win/loss analysis, updating positioning, or when user mentions competitive intelligence, competitor analysis, battlecards, win/loss, market positioning, or competitive strategy.
license	MIT + Commons Clause
metadata	{"version":"2.0.0","author":"borghei","category":"c-level","domain":"competitive-strategy","updated":"2026-03-09T00:00:00.000Z","frameworks":["5-layer-intelligence","battlecard-template","win-loss-analysis","positioning-map","tracking-cadence","threat-assessment"],"triggers":["competitive intelligence","competitor analysis","battlecard","win/loss analysis","competitive positioning","competitive tracking","market intelligence","competitor research","SWOT","competitive map","feature gap","competitive strategy","competitor launched","lost deal to competitor","competitive win","market positioning","sales battlecard"]}

	Same ICP	Different ICP
Same problem	Direct threat (Tier 1)	Adjacent watch (Tier 2)
Different problem	Displacement risk (Tier 2)	Monitor only (Tier 3)

Tier	Definition	Tracking Intensity	Examples
1: Direct	Same ICP, same problem, similar price	Monthly deep tracking	Your top 3 named competitors
2: Adjacent	Same budget, different solution approach	Quarterly review	Build-in-house, adjacent products
3: Future	Well-funded in adjacent space or incumbents with roadmap overlap	Semi-annual scan	Funded startups, big tech features

Dimension	Sources	Cadence	Priority
Product moves	Changelog, G2, Capterra, Twitter, LinkedIn	Monthly	High
Pricing changes	Pricing page, sales intel, customer feedback	Triggered	High
Funding	Crunchbase, TechCrunch, LinkedIn	Triggered	Medium
Hiring signals	LinkedIn job postings, Indeed, Glassdoor	Monthly	Medium
Partnerships	Press releases, co-marketing, integrations	Triggered	Medium
Customer wins/losses	Case studies, review sites, LinkedIn	Monthly	High
Customer losses (theirs)	G2 reviews, forums, your own inbound	Ongoing	High
Messaging shifts	Homepage, ads, conference talks	Quarterly	Medium

Element	Key Questions
Strengths	Where do they consistently win? What do customers praise?
Weaknesses	Where do they lose? What do reviews complain about?
Opportunities	What could they do that would threaten you more?
Threats	What is their existential risk? What could make them irrelevant?

Feature/Capability	You	Competitor A	Competitor B	Status
Core Feature 1	[check]	[check]	[x]	Your advantage
Core Feature 2	[x]	[check]	[check]	Gap -- on roadmap?
Feature 3	[check]	[x]	[x]	Moat (unique to you)
Feature 4	[x]	[x]	[check]	Comp B only
Feature 5	[check]	[check]	[check]	Table stakes

Common Axis Pairs	When to Use
Price vs. Feature Depth	When you compete on value
Enterprise-ready vs. SMB-ready	When you serve a different segment
Easy to Implement vs. Configurable	When implementation speed is your advantage
Vertical-specific vs. Horizontal	When you specialize

Cadence	Activity	Output
Monthly (scheduled)	Review Tier 1 competitors, update battlecards	Updated battlecards + leadership summary
Triggered (event)	Competitor raises funding, launches feature, changes pricing	Impact assessment within 48 hours
Quarterly	Full landscape review, positioning map update	Board-ready competitive slide
Annual	Add/remove tracked competitors, refresh threat assessment	Updated competitive strategy

Event	Interview?	Who Conducts
Lost deal > $50K ACV	Always	Non-AE (CS, product, or external)
Churn > 6 months tenure	Always	CS or product team
Competitive win	Selectively	Product or marketing
Lost to "no decision"	Sample	Marketing or product

Order	Question	What You Learn
1	"Walk me through your evaluation process"	How they buy, who was involved
2	"Who else were you considering?"	Competitive set from their perspective
3	"What were the top 3 criteria in your decision?"	Decision drivers (may differ from what AE reported)
4	"Where did [our product] fall short?"	Specific gaps, not vague "they were better"
5	"What was the deciding factor?"	The one thing that tipped the decision
6	"What would have changed your decision?"	The counterfactual -- most actionable intel

Metric	Cadence	Output
Win reasons (ranked by frequency)	Monthly	Top 5 with trend
Loss reasons (ranked by frequency)	Monthly	Top 5 with trend
Competitor win rates (by competitor, segment)	Monthly	Competitive scoreboard
Win rate trends over time	Quarterly	Trend lines for board

Signal	Risk
Roadmap driven by "they shipped X"	Reactive, not strategic
Team morale drops when competitor fundraises	Emotional, not analytical
Shipping features to match checklists	Building for competitors, not customers
Pricing always starts with "well, they charge X"	Cost-anchored, not value-anchored

Signal	Risk
AEs blindsided on calls	Losing deals from lack of preparation
Prospects know more than your team	Credibility gap in sales
Missed major competitor launch	Reactive when it could have been proactive
Positioning unchanged in 12+ months	Market moved, you did not

Audience	Format	Cadence	Owner
AEs + SDRs	Battlecards in CRM	Monthly + triggered	CRO
Product	Feature gap analysis	Quarterly	CPO
Marketing	Positioning brief	Quarterly	CMO
Leadership	1-page competitive summary	Monthly	CEO/COO
Board	Competitive landscape slide	Quarterly	CEO

Signal	Implication	Action
Competitor win rate > 50% in core segment	Fundamental positioning problem	Strategy review, not more battlecards
Same objection from 5+ deals	Feature gap that is real, not optics	Product roadmap input
Competitor hired 10+ engineers in your domain	Major product investment incoming	Accelerate your roadmap or differentiate
Competitor raised > $20M targeting your ICP	12-month competitive intensity increase	Strengthen moat, lock in customers
Prospects evaluate you to justify competitor choice	You are the "check box"	Fix perception or change segment
No win/loss interviews conducted	Learning nothing from outcomes	Implement win/loss program immediately

Request	Deliverable
"Map the competitive landscape"	Competitor identification + tier classification + positioning map
"Build a battlecard for [competitor]"	Sales battlecard with win themes, landmines, killer questions
"Analyze our win/loss data"	Aggregate analysis with patterns, trends, and recommendations
"Competitor just launched [feature]"	Impact assessment + recommended response + timeline
"Competitive section for board"	Monthly summary: movements, win/loss, recommended actions
"Update our positioning"	Positioning analysis against current competitive landscape

Flag	Type	Description
`--input`	required	Path to JSON file with competitor data (name, tier, dimensions, scores)
`--json`	optional	Output in JSON format instead of human-readable text

Flag	Type	Description
`--input`	required	Path to JSON file with competitor tracking entries over time
`--json`	optional	Output in JSON format instead of human-readable text

Flag	Type	Description
`--input`	required	Path to JSON file with strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats (each with description, impact 1-10, confidence 1-10)
`--json`	optional	Output in JSON format instead of human-readable text

Intelligence Type	Feeds To	Action
Product moves	CPO (`cpo-advisor`)	Roadmap input, feature gap review
Pricing changes	CRO + CFO	Pricing response evaluation
Funding rounds	CEO + CFO	Strategic positioning update
Hiring signals	CHRO + CTO	Talent market intelligence
Customer wins/losses	CRO + CMO	Battlecard updates, positioning shifts
Marketing campaigns	CMO (`cmo-advisor`)	Counter-positioning, channel strategy
Market trends	CEO + Board Deck Builder	Board competitive slide

Problem	Likely Cause	Resolution
Battlecards outdated within weeks of creation	No triggered update process for competitor moves	Implement event-driven battlecard updates tied to monitoring alerts; assign a battlecard owner per Tier 1 competitor
Win/loss interviews not being conducted	AEs reluctant to participate or no clear owner	Assign non-AE interviewers (CS, product, or external); make win/loss a process requirement, not optional
Competitive intel stays in Slack, not reaching sales	No single source of truth or distribution cadence	Centralize intel in CRM-attached battlecards; set monthly distribution cadence with CRO ownership
Feature gap analysis does not influence roadmap	Product team not consuming competitive data	Include CPO in quarterly landscape review; tie gap analysis to roadmap planning cycle
Competitor tier classification never updated	No annual review of competitive landscape	Schedule annual tier reassessment; add/remove competitors based on ICP overlap and funding changes
Team over-reacts to every competitor move	No framework for assessing threat significance	Use the Threat Classification Matrix to filter signal from noise; only escalate Tier 1 changes
Intelligence collection is inconsistent	No assigned owners or cadence for tracking dimensions	Assign dimension owners from the Intelligence Distribution table; automate monitoring where possible

competitive-intel

Informações da origem

Opções de instalação

Revise os arquivos de origem

Mais deste repositório

Mais deste repositório

Competitive Intelligence

Keywords

5-Layer Intelligence System

Layer 1: Competitor Identification

Threat Classification Matrix

Competitor Tiers

Layer 2: Tracking Dimensions

Layer 3: Analysis Frameworks

SWOT Per Competitor

Feature Gap Analysis Template

Competitive Positioning Map

Layer 4: Output Formats

Battlecard Template (Sales Use)

Board Competitive Summary (Monthly)

Layer 5: Intelligence Cadence

Win/Loss Analysis

When to Conduct

Interview Protocol

Aggregate Analysis

The Balance: Intelligence vs. Obsession

Over-Tracking Signals

Under-Tracking Signals

The Right Posture

Intelligence Distribution

Red Flags

Integration with C-Suite

Output Artifacts

Tool Reference

1. market_landscape_mapper.py

2. competitor_tracker.py

3. swot_analyzer.py

Troubleshooting

Success Criteria

Scope & Limitations

Integration Points