Produces a reframed product positioning — a before/after statement that replaces a keep-or-kill decision with a complementary role for the product — plus a set of strategic routes that leverage that role. Use when: 'should we deprecate X now that we have Y', 'this feature feels redundant', 'we cannot decide whether to keep this product', 'two things in our portfolio seem to overlap'.
Instalar com Codex ou Claude Copie este prompt, cole no Codex, Claude ou outro assistente e deixe que ele revise a página da skill e instale para você.
Um comando direto ignora o prompt de revisão. Verifique a origem antes de executá-lo.
Instruções da origem · Visualização somente leitura
name
product-positioning
model
opus
description
Produces a reframed product positioning — a before/after statement that replaces a keep-or-kill decision with a complementary role for the product — plus a set of strategic routes that leverage that role. Use when: 'should we deprecate X now that we have Y', 'this feature feels redundant', 'we cannot decide whether to keep this product', 'two things in our portfolio seem to overlap'.
category
strategic-thinking
triggers
["should we deprecate X now that we have Y","this feature feels redundant","we cannot decide whether to keep this product","two things in our portfolio seem to overlap"]
tier
1
agents
["primary"]
tool_dependencies
["file_system"]
inputs
[{"name":"product_tension","type":"string","description":"The keep-or-kill decision or overlap tension to resolve through positioning","required":true}]
outputs
[{"name":"positioning_document","type":"ref","format":"cas-ref","description":"Reframed product positioning with before/after statement and strategic routes leveraging the complementary role"}]
Product Positioning Scout Skill
Version: 1.1 Created: 2026-02-07 Updated: 2026-02-07 Author: Manus AI Purpose: To guide the process of reframing a binary product decision into a strategic product positioning opportunity by identifying the unique value of a product or feature.
I. The Philosophy: Beyond the Binary
The most common trap in product strategy is the binary choice: keep or kill, build or buy, deprecate or maintain. These choices are limiting because they assume the value of a product is fixed. The Product Positioning Scout operates on a different principle: value is contextual.
This skill is about breaking free from the binary trap by asking a more powerful question: "What is this uniquely good at?" By identifying the unique context in which a product or feature shines, we can transform a "legacy" feature into a "premium" experience, a "redundant" product into a "complementary" one.
The core insight: The reframe is the prize, not the initial answer.
II. When to Use This Skill
When facing a decision about whether to keep or deprecate a feature or product
When a product or feature seems redundant or is underperforming
When planning a multi-surface product strategy (e.g., web, desktop, mobile)
At the beginning of a strategic planning cycle
Before using /strategic-scout to ensure the question is properly framed
III. The Workflow
This is a 5-step workflow for reframing a product decision.
Step 1: Identify the Binary Trap
Goal: Recognize when a strategic question is being framed as a simple, limiting binary choice.
Actions:
Listen for questions like "Should we keep X or get rid of it?"
Notice when the conversation is focused on resource allocation rather than strategic value
Identify the implicit assumption that the product/feature has only one use case
Output: A clear articulation of the binary trap
Example: "Should we deprecate the web app now that we're building desktop?"
Step 2: Introduce the Unlocking Question
Goal: Reframe the conversation by asking a question that shatters the binary and opens up new possibilities.
Actions:
Ask:
"What is this uniquely good at that the other thing isn't?"
Shift the focus from "what to do with this" to "what is its unique value?"
Challenge the assumption that products must compete rather than complement
Output: A reframed question that opens up new strategic possibilities
Example: "What is the web app uniquely good at that desktop isn't?" → Discovery, onboarding, cross-platform access without installation
Step 3: Explore the Unique Value
Goal: Brainstorm the unique strengths and contexts of the product in question.
Actions:
List the unique strengths of the product/feature
Identify the specific contexts (e.g., mobile, on-the-go, deep work) where those strengths are most valuable
Consider edge cases and niche use cases that might be surprisingly valuable
Output: A comprehensive list of unique value propositions
Example for web app:
No installation required
Cross-platform (works on any OS)
Easy to share via URL
Great for discovery and onboarding
Accessible from any device
Step 4: Re-Scout with the New Lens
Goal: Use the new understanding of unique value to re-scout the strategic options.
Actions:
Use /strategic-scout with the new framing
Explore routes that leverage the unique value (e.g., Mobile-First PWA, Native Companion App)
Consider complementary positioning rather than competitive positioning
Output: A set of strategic routes that leverage the unique value
Example routes:
Route 1: Web as discovery, desktop as core product
Route 2: Web as free tier, desktop as premium
Route 3: Web for onboarding, desktop for power users
Route 4: Deprecate web, focus on desktop (original binary)
Step 5: Synthesize and Propose New Positioning
Goal: Synthesize the new routes into a coherent product strategy and positioning.
Actions:
Select the best route (e.g., Hybrid - PWA Now, Native Later)
Define the new product positioning (e.g., Desktop for deep work, Mobile for on-the-go orchestration)
Propose a new timeline and pricing model
Document the strategic rationale
Output: A complete product positioning strategy
Example: "Desktop as core ($20/month), Mobile PWA as premium tier (separate subscription, 4-6 weeks after desktop v1)"
IV. Best Practices
1. The Reframe is Everything
Why: The most powerful strategic moves come from reframing the question, not from choosing between existing options.
How: Always start by questioning the framing of the decision. Is it really a binary choice?
2. Value is Contextual
Why: A product's value is not inherent; it's determined by the context in which it's used.
How: For every product/feature, ask "In what context is this uniquely valuable?"
3. Complement, Don't Compete
Why: The best multi-surface strategies create complementary experiences, not competing ones.
How: Frame each surface by its unique job-to-be-done, not by its feature list.
4. The Unlocking Question is Universal
Why: "What is this uniquely good at?" works for products, features, surfaces, and even people.
How: Use this question whenever you're facing a binary decision about value.
5. Document the Reframe
Why: The reframe is the most valuable artifact. It changes how everyone thinks about the product.
How: Write down the before/after framing explicitly. Share it widely.
V. Quality Checklist
Before delivering the new strategy, ensure you can answer "yes" to all of the following questions:
Have you identified and articulated the initial binary trap?
Have you asked the "Unlocking Question" to reframe the conversation?
Have you clearly defined the unique value and context of the product/feature?
Have you used /strategic-scout to explore new routes based on the new framing?
Have you proposed a new, coherent product positioning, timeline, and business model?
Have you documented the strategic rationale for the new positioning?
VI. Example: Dojo Genesis Web App Positioning
The Binary Trap: "Should we deprecate the web app now that we're building desktop?"
The Unlocking Question: "What is the web app uniquely good at that desktop isn't?"
The Unique Value:
No installation required
Cross-platform access
Easy to share via URL
Great for discovery and onboarding
Accessible from any device
The Re-Scout: Used /strategic-scout to explore 4 routes:
Deprecate web, focus on desktop
Web as companion (lightweight version)
Web as discovery/onboarding, desktop as core
Hybrid - PWA now, native later
The New Positioning:
Desktop: Core product for deep work ($20/month)
Mobile PWA: Premium tier for on-the-go orchestration (separate subscription, 4-6 weeks after desktop v1)
Web: Free tier for discovery and onboarding
The Outcome: Transformed a deprecation decision into a multi-surface strategy where each surface has a unique, complementary role.
Key Insight: The web app wasn't redundant—it was uniquely good at discovery and onboarding. Desktop is uniquely good at deep work. Mobile is uniquely good at on-the-go orchestration.
VII. Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Pitfall 1: Accepting the Binary Without Question
Problem: Most binary choices are false binaries. Accepting them limits strategic options.
Solution: Always question the framing. Ask "Is this really a binary choice?"
Pitfall 2: Focusing on Features Instead of Context
Problem: Comparing feature lists leads to "X is redundant because Y has all its features."
Solution: Focus on context of use, not feature parity. Ask "What is this uniquely good at?"
Pitfall 3: Competitive Positioning by Default
Problem: Assuming products must compete rather than complement.
Solution: Explore complementary positioning first. Competition should be a last resort.
Pitfall 4: Skipping the Re-Scout
Problem: Reframing the question but not exploring new routes based on the reframe.
Solution: Always use /strategic-scout after reframing to explore new possibilities.
Pitfall 5: Not Documenting the Reframe
Problem: The reframe gets lost in conversation. People revert to the binary.
Solution: Write down the before/after framing explicitly. Make it a reference document.
VIII. Related Skills
strategic-scout - Use this after reframing to explore new routes
iterative-scouting - Use this to refine the positioning based on feedback
multi-surface-strategy - Use this to design the complete multi-surface strategy
release-specification - Use this to write specs for the new positioning
strategic-to-tactical-workflow - Use this to move from positioning to implementation
Output
Before/after framing document: the original binary question stated explicitly, then the reframed question and its implications
Unique value list: 3-7 specific strengths of the product tied to concrete usage contexts, not generic adjectives
Strategic routes: 3-5 routes that capitalize on the reframe, each with a one-line tradeoff summary
Recommended positioning: the selected route with pricing, timeline, and rationale
Examples
Scenario 1: "Should we deprecate our web app now that we have a desktop client?" → Reframe identifying the web app's unique strength (no install, shareable URL, cross-OS access) leads to a recommendation to keep the web app as the free-tier discovery and onboarding surface, with the desktop client as the paid power-user product.
Scenario 2: "We have two note-taking features in our app — daily log and knowledge base. Should we cut one?" → Unique value analysis reveals daily log is optimized for speed and recency (quick capture, ephemeral) while knowledge base is optimized for retrieval and permanence. Reframe: they serve different moments in a user's day, not the same job. Recommendation: keep both, but make the entry points contextually distinct.
Edge Cases
If the user is certain one product must be cut for financial or resource reasons, skip the reframe and go directly to Step 5 — help them position the remaining product more strongly rather than trying to save what is already decided.
If both products genuinely do the same job in the same context with no meaningful differentiation, the binary may not be false — document that finding honestly and recommend consolidation.
If the product in question is a third-party integration rather than an owned product, route to strategic-scout instead — positioning is only useful for things the team controls.
Anti-Patterns
Generating a unique value list made of generic descriptors ("flexible", "powerful", "easy to use") — every item must be tied to a specific context of use where the product outperforms the alternative.
Reframing without running new strategic routes — a reframe that does not produce actionable routes is just a restatement of the problem in nicer language.
Concluding the session without documenting the before/after framing — the reframe is the primary deliverable and must be written down explicitly so it can be referenced later.
Treating reframing as a way to avoid hard cuts — if the unique value analysis produces nothing concrete, the honest output is "this product does not have a defensible niche."
IX. Skill Metadata
Token Savings: ~3,000-5,000 tokens per positioning session Quality Impact: Transforms binary decisions into strategic opportunities Maintenance: Update when new positioning patterns emerge
When to Update This Skill:
After completing 3-5 positioning sessions (to incorporate new patterns)
When a new type of binary trap is discovered
When the unlocking question evolves or new variants emerge
Last Updated: 2026-02-07 Maintained By: Manus AI Status: Active
