Engineer visual proof stacks that map to the Donahoe Method's 5 proof types: testimonial layouts (text + photo + name + result), logo bars, video > text hierarchy, quote-photo-result cards, numerical proof, case studies. Specs paste-ready HTML/CSS for each pattern + placement rules across the page.
Use when designing the proof zone of a sales page, VSL page, lead-magnet page, or any asset where Lock 2 (Trust) needs visual scaffolding.
Not for writing testimonial copy from scratch (use /convert proof) and not for live-page proof teardown (use /market landing).
Instalar com Codex ou Claude Copie este prompt, cole no Codex, Claude ou outro assistente e deixe que ele revise a página da skill e instale para você.
Um comando direto ignora o prompt de revisão. Verifique a origem antes de executá-lo.
Instruções da origem · Visualização somente leitura
name
convert-proof-stack
slash_command
false
pack
business-conversion
family
visual_conversion
description
Engineer visual proof stacks that map to the Donahoe Method's 5 proof types: testimonial layouts (text + photo + name + result), logo bars, video > text hierarchy, quote-photo-result cards, numerical proof, case studies. Specs paste-ready HTML/CSS for each pattern + placement rules across the page.
Use when designing the proof zone of a sales page, VSL page, lead-magnet page, or any asset where Lock 2 (Trust) needs visual scaffolding.
Not for writing testimonial copy from scratch (use /convert proof) and not for live-page proof teardown (use /market landing).
{"lineage":"The Donahoe Method - Conversational Proof + 5 proof types (Wayland-owned operating system); Cialdini's social-proof principle (Influence, 1984/2021); Aristotle's three rhetorical appeals (ethos / pathos / logos, c. 350 BCE) for the proof-type hierarchy"}
Convert Proof-Stack - Visual Stacking of the 5 Donahoe Proof Types
"Proof in Donahoe copy never announces itself. It doesn't feel like 'evidence.' It feels like conversation." - The Donahoe Method, Framework 2
This skill takes the 5 Donahoe proof types - Anecdote / Receipt / Drive-By / Namecheck / Because - and engineers their visual rendering across the page. Every proof block is mapped to a layout pattern that preserves the Method's conversational feel while exploiting visual hierarchy to maximize believability.
Designing the visual proof zones of a long-form sales page or VSL page (Sections 7 + 9 in convert-scroll-rhythm's skeleton)
Translating the output of /convert proof (which writes the proof copy) into specific layout patterns
Adding a logo bar, testimonial grid, video testimonial block, or case-study card section
Diagnosing why an existing proof zone reads as "marketing" instead of "conversation"
Do NOT use for:
Writing testimonial copy from scratch - use /convert proof (this skill renders that output)
Generating fake testimonials - Wayland never fabricates proof; if no proof exists, omit the block
Auditing an existing live page's proof section - use /market landing <url>
Building the full sales page - use /convert sales-page
The 5 Donahoe Proof Types (Framework 2)
Proof in Donahoe copy is woven throughout, not isolated to a "proof section." Five types, used in priority order:
#
Type
What it looks like
Visual pattern
1
The Anecdote
"Here's what happened when..." - story-form proof
Quote card with photo, name, location, specific result
2
The Receipt
Numbers, dates, exact amounts ("$14,327 in 11 days")
Numerical proof block with the number large + context line
3
The Drive-By
Credentials mentioned in passing
Inline byline / "About me" sliver / passing footnote
4
The Namecheck
"A guy named Mike sent me an email..."
Conversational quote (no formal testimonial block) inline with body copy
5
The Because
"The reason this works is..." - logical mechanism
Mechanism diagram or sub-headed explainer with simple iconography
Each type wants a different visual treatment. A logo bar of recognizable companies is a Receipt + Authority hybrid. A case study card with before/after numbers is an Anecdote + Receipt fusion. The patterns below map proof type → layout.
Temperature-based decision rule: Conversational vs Blocked Proof
The Method's Conversational Proof rule says proof should never announce itself - it should feel like the rest of the body copy with subtle attribution. But high-temperature audiences (Hot, Boiling) on commerce surfaces (e-commerce product pages, OTOs, post-purchase cross-sells) actually expect blocked testimonials and treat their absence as a missing trust signal. The Method bends, slightly, on those surfaces.
Temperature
Default proof framing
Notes
Ice Cold
Conversational always
Blocked testimonials trigger "this is marketing" defenses; conversational proof slips past them
Cool
Conversational always
Same. Pull-quote inline, attribution as inline figcaption, no card framing
Warm
Conversational by default; blocked sparingly
One blocked testimonial card near the CTA stack is fine; more than that drifts into brochure-territory
The default figure.proof rule renders Conversational Proof - body-text margin, italic, currentColor 2px left border, inline figcaption. It looks like a passing aside, not a quote-box.
Add the block modifier (<figure class="proof block">) only when the temperature is Hot/Boiling AND the surface is commerce-shaped (post-purchase OTO, cross-sell, e-commerce PDP).
OTO and cross-sell page-builders flip the default - those surfaces ship blocked-by-default with figure.proof.conversational available as the opt-in for cooler temperatures.
This rule is load-bearing: every page-builder's HTML scaffold MUST honor it. If a Cool-temperature sales page ships with quote-box testimonial cards, the Method's Conversational Proof rule has been violated even if the copy is perfect.
The 7 Proof Stack Patterns (ranked by typical conversion lift)
Source: direct-response canon + Cialdini social proof (1984/2021) + folklore-leaning conversion data. Top entries are stronger than bottom but always: real beats designed, and any one strong type beats five weak types.
Pattern 1 - Video Testimonial Card (named, faced person + verifiable result)
Strongest typical lift. ~30%+ over no testimonials in some studies (varies wildly; folklore-leaning).
+---------------------------+
| |
| [▶ poster image, 16:9] |
| |
+---------------------------+
| Name, Title, Company |
| "Specific result quote." |
| |
| [+$47K in 90 days] | ← optional result chip
+---------------------------+
Rules:
Poster image shows the person's face - never a logo or product screenshot
Play on tap; no autoplay (mobile-bandwidth hostile)
Caption with name + title + company under the video
Optional result chip below the caption (specific, verifiable)
Aspect ratio 16:9 desktop / 9:16 if filmed vertically (don't letterbox vertical video)
Pattern 2 - Text Testimonial + Photo + Name + Result
Strong - the workhorse pattern.
+--------------------------------+
| [ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦ ] |
| |
| "Quote with the specific |
| nerve hit and outcome - |
| 3-5 sentences of voice." |
| |
| [photo] Name |
| Title, Company |
| +$X result |
+--------------------------------+
Rules:
Photo is a real headshot (square, 64-96px); no stock, no avatar generator
Name + title + company present (anonymized testimonials hurt conversion vs no testimonial)
Quote includes a specific number, date, or before/after
Star row optional but benign; never replaces the quote
Pattern 3 - Logo Bar (recognizable clients)
Modest lift, cheap to add.
+--------------------------------------------------+
| AS USED BY |
| [logo] [logo] [logo] [logo] [logo] [logo] |
+--------------------------------------------------+
Rules:
Logos are real and recognizable to the target reader
Grayscale or 50-70% opacity (low-key visual presence)
3-7 logos; more than 7 = vanity, fewer than 3 = thin
Single row desktop; wraps to 2-3 rows on mobile
Above the fold trust strip = 3-4 logos; in-page bar = 5-7 logos
Never invent logos. Faking "as seen in" is the fastest credibility-killer on the web.
Pattern 4 - Numerical Proof Block (Receipt-type)
Credibility multiplier when paired with other proof.
+----------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
| 1,847 | $2.4M | 4.9 / 5 |
| founders served | total revenue | based on 312 |
| | tracked | reviews |
+----------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
Rules:
3-4 numbers max - more reads as desperate
Numbers are specific, not rounded ("1,847" beats "1,800+" beats "thousands")
Each number gets a one-line context label
Numbers live in a row on desktop, stacked column on mobile
Numbers are real and verifiable
Pair with at least one other proof type - naked numbers feel staged
Pattern 5 - Case Study Card (before/after with quote)
Strong for considered purchases ($100+).
+-----------------------------------------+
| CASE STUDY - Mike, plumber, Ohio |
+-----------------------------------------+
| BEFORE AFTER |
| $0 online leads 47 leads/week |
| $40K wasted on ads $18K MRR |
| |
| "I set this up on a Thursday and woke |
| up Saturday to 47 leads. I called Sean|
| because I thought something was |
| broken." |
| |
| [photo] - Mike R., Cleveland |
+-----------------------------------------+
Rules:
Headline names the person + role + location ("Mike, plumber, Ohio")
Two-column before/after with specific numbers
Quote in voice (Donahoe Voice Rules - first person, contractions, no marketing-speak)
Photo + name + location at the bottom
2-4 case study cards per page max - more is overload
+--------------------------------+
| ⭐ 4.8 on G2 (312 reviews) |
| ⭐ 4.9 on Trustpilot (847 rev.) |
+--------------------------------+
Rules:
Real badges only with link to source
Live counts preferred over static numbers
1-2 badges; rotating "G2 Leader Spring 2025" type seals add authority halo
Place adjacent to the primary CTA (Trust Signals Placement, §7.6)
Pattern 7 - Press / Media Mentions
Modest direct lift, big authority halo.
+--------------------------------------------------+
| AS FEATURED IN |
| [Forbes] [TechCrunch] [WSJ] [Inc.] |
+--------------------------------------------------+
Rules:
Real coverage only - link out to the article when possible
Outlets recognizable to the target reader (Forbes for B2C, TechCrunch for tech, etc.)
3-5 outlets; row format
Halo effect even if the link is a passing mention
Anti-Pattern - Anonymous Testimonials
+---------------------------+
| "This product changed my |
| life!" |
| - Sarah K., Entrepreneur |
+---------------------------+
These hurt conversion vs no testimonial. Anonymized first-name-last-initial-vague-title testimonials read as fake. If the real person isn't willing to attach a name, photo, and verifiable detail, omit. Empty space beats fake proof.
Inputs
Required:
Asset type - sales page / VSL / squeeze / OTO / lead-magnet (changes proof zone size)
Real proof inventory - what proof exists and is shippable? Customer names, photos, quotes, specific results, logos, numbers, press mentions, case studies. Wayland never invents.
Method skill output - output of /convert proof (the actual proof copy) is the source content this skill renders
"A guy named Mike asked me..." inline within answer
Conversational
Each zone gets its proof. The page never feels like one big "PROOF" chunk; it feels like proof keeps showing up.
Composition by temperature
Temperature
Total proof items
Pattern emphasis
Ice Cold
8-12
Anecdote (their pain) + Because (mechanism) heavy
Cool
6-10
Anecdote + Receipt mix
Warm
5-8
Receipt + Case Study heavy (differentiation)
Hot
4-6
Numerical proof + Safety Net heavy (commitment)
Boiling
2-4
Final reminder + redemption story only
Proof Rhythm (claim → proof → claim → proof)
The Method's proof rhythm: every major claim gets at least one layer of proof within 2-3 sentences. Visually, this means the proof patterns above are not just in dedicated proof blocks - they are sprinkled inline through the body copy.
Visual implementation:
Inline pull-quotes - pulled-out lines of text from a testimonial, set in larger type / colored, breaking the body copy column
Inline result chips - small inline badges ("$47K in 90 days") placed beside a claim
Inline photo + caption - small photo (32-48px) placed in margin or inline-flow with the body, captioning a Namecheck
These keep proof density high without creating "proof sections" that feel marketing-formal.
Workflow
Step 1 - Inventory the real proof
Ask the user: "What real proof do you have?" Map their answers to the 5 proof types and the 7 patterns. If a category is empty, mark it; never invent to fill it. Common categories:
Founder credentials - what specific past results / shipped products / dollar amounts?
Step 2 - Map the inventory to zones
Distribute the real proof across the scroll zones per the table above. Honor priority order (Anecdote first, then Receipt, then Drive-By, then Namecheck, then Because) when picking which inventory item lands in which slot.
Step 3 - Spec each pattern
For each proof block, emit a wireframe + the specific copy (pulled from /convert proof output) + the layout rules. If the user supplied raw testimonials, format them into Pattern 2 cards; if raw video links, format Pattern 1 cards.
Step 4 - Mobile compression check
For every pattern, define the mobile rendering:
Pattern 1 (video): 9:16 if vertical, full-width 16:9 if horizontal
Pattern 2 (text + photo): single column, photo above quote OR small inline
Pattern 3 (logo bar): wraps to 2-3 rows
Pattern 4 (numerical): stacks vertically (one number per row)
Anonymous testimonials: <none / N flagged → action>
Invented logos / press: <verified real / N flagged → action>
Rounded numbers: <verified specific / N replaced>
Stock photos in testimonial slots: <verified real / N replaced>
How to deploy
Use this proof map as the proof zone of /convert sales-page.
Pair with /convert above-fold - the hero trust strip is Pattern 3 compressed.
Pair with /convert scroll-rhythm - proof rhythm follows the zone allocations.
Pair with /convert mobile - every pattern's mobile compression is specced above.
Run /convert audit once the page is assembled - proof rhythm scoring lives there.
## Pitfalls
- **Concentrating proof in one block.** A single "PROOF" section labeled "Testimonials" feels like a marketing brochure. Distribute across zones.
- **Anonymous testimonials.** First-name-last-initial-vague-title hurts conversion vs no testimonial. Empty space beats fake proof.
- **Stock photo headshots.** Recognizable as stock = signals fake. Real photos only; if not available, drop the photo (text-only quote with name + verifiable detail still works).
- **Rounded numbers.** "10,000+ users" reads less true than "1,847 founders." Specificity is credibility.
- **Logo overload.** 12 client logos feels desperate. 5-7 is the sweet spot.
- **Invented "as seen in" mentions.** A faked Forbes logo is grounds for instant credibility loss and possible legal exposure. Real coverage only.
- **Video autoplay.** Bandwidth-hostile and almost universally blocked. Always poster + tap-to-play.
- **Overstacking.** 30+ testimonials in one zone reads as protesting too much. 3-4 strong testimonials beat 30 weak.
- **Proof without claim.** A testimonial dropped beside no specific claim is decorative. Claim → proof rhythm requires the proof to be tied to a claim within 2-3 sentences.
## Lineage
- **Conversational Proof + 5 proof types** - The Donahoe Method, Framework 2 (Wayland-owned operating system)
- **Anecdote / Receipt / Drive-By / Namecheck / Because** - Donahoe-coined proof typology
- **Cialdini's social proof principle** - *Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion* (Cialdini, 1984; expanded 2021)
- **Aristotle's three rhetorical appeals** (ethos / pathos / logos, *Rhetoric*, c. 350 BCE) - the priority order maps loosely: pathos (Anecdote) → logos (Receipt + Because) → ethos (Drive-By + Namecheck)
- **Proof stacking conversion data** - direct-response folklore + replicated case-study research (cited as folklore-leaning where appropriate)
- **Anti-pattern (anonymous testimonial)** - replicated split tests showing anonymized testimonials *underperform* no testimonial
## Notes
- Wayland never invents proof. If the inventory is thin, the page either has thin proof (visible, honest) or proof types are weighted toward what's available (e.g., heavy Drive-By + Because if only one customer testimonial exists yet).
- Proof is woven, not concentrated. A page with one giant "Testimonials" section and no proof anywhere else fails the Method's proof rhythm even if every testimonial is strong.
- Mobile rendering is non-optional. Specify it for every pattern.
- This skill is downstream of `/convert proof` (which writes the actual proof copy) and upstream of `/convert sales-page` (which uses this map as the proof zone). It composes with `/convert scroll-rhythm` for placement and `/convert mobile` for compression.
- Real beats designed. Real beats polished. Real beats abundant. One real, specific, named, faced testimonial converts better than ten polished anonymous ones.
