valuation-model

name	valuation-model
description	Valuation methodology — absolute valuation with DCF / DDM / SOTP, relative valuation with PE-Band / PB-ROE / EV-EBITDA, sensitivity analysis, and valuation-trap detection.
category	analysis

Valuation Methodology

Overview

Systematic corporate valuation framework covering absolute valuation (DCF / DDM / SOTP) and relative valuation (PE / PB / EV-EBITDA), including sensitivity-analysis methods and a checklist for identifying valuation traps.

Absolute Valuation Methods

1. DCF (Discounted Cash Flow)

Core formulas:

Enterprise value = Σ FCF_t / (1+WACC)^t + TV / (1+WACC)^n
Equity value = enterprise value - net debt
Per-share value = equity value / total shares outstanding

Detailed steps:

Step 1: Forecast free cash flow (usually 5 years)

FCFF = EBIT × (1-tax rate) + depreciation & amortization - capex - increase in working capital

Simplified version:
FCFF ≈ operating cash flow - capex

Year	Revenue (100m RMB)	EBIT (100m RMB)	FCFF (100m RMB)	Growth
2026E	120	24	18	+15%
2027E	138	28	21	+15%
2028E	155	31	24	+12%
2029E	170	34	26	+10%
2030E	182	36	28	+7%

Step 2: Calculate WACC

WACC = E/(D+E) × Ke + D/(D+E) × Kd × (1-T)

Ke (cost of equity) = Rf + β × (Rm - Rf)
  - Rf: 10-year government bond yield (about 2.5% for China A-shares)
  - β: industry average or company beta (1.0-1.5)
  - Rm-Rf: equity risk premium (about 5-7% for China A-shares)

Kd: cost of debt (loan rate, about 4-5%)
T: income tax rate (25%)

Reference WACC ranges for China A-shares:

Industry	WACC Range	Reference β
Consumer	8-10%	0.8-1.0
Technology	10-13%	1.2-1.5
Financials	7-9%	1.0-1.2
Cyclicals	9-12%	1.0-1.4
Utilities	6-8%	0.5-0.8

Step 3: Terminal Value

Perpetual-growth method: TV = FCF_n × (1+g) / (WACC - g)
  - g: perpetual growth rate (usually 2-3%, should not exceed GDP growth)

Exit-multiple method: TV = EBITDA_n × EV/EBITDA multiple
  - Reference the industry average or historical median

Step 4: Sensitivity Analysis

### DCF Sensitivity Analysis (per-share value, RMB)

| WACC \ g | 2.0% | 2.5% | 3.0% |
|----------|------|------|------|
| 9.0% | 32.5 | 35.8 | 40.2 |
| 9.5% | 28.3 | 30.8 | 34.0 |
| 10.0% | 24.8 | 26.7 | 29.1 |
| 10.5% | 22.0 | 23.5 | 25.3 |
| 11.0% | 19.6 | 20.8 | 22.2 |

2. DDM (Dividend Discount Model)

Applicable to: high-dividend stocks (banks, utilities, mature consumer companies).

Two-stage DDM:
P = Σ D_t / (1+Ke)^t + D_n × (1+g) / [(Ke-g) × (1+Ke)^n]

Gordon model (single stage):
P = D_1 / (Ke - g)

Applicability checklist:

• Has paid dividends continuously for more than 3 years
• Stable payout ratio (>30%)
• Strong earnings predictability
• Usually not suitable for high-growth stocks (no dividends / low payout)

3. SOTP (Sum of the Parts)

Applicable to: diversified conglomerates.

Group value = Σ valuation of each business segment + net cash - holding-company discount

Example (a group company):
| Segment | Revenue (100m RMB) | Valuation Method | Valuation (100m RMB) |
|------|---------|---------|---------|
| Baijiu | 80 | 30x PE | 600 |
| Real estate | 50 | 0.6x PB | 120 |
| Financials | 30 | 1.0x PB | 200 |
| Total | | | 920 |
| Holding-company discount | | -15% | -138 |
| Group valuation | | | 782 |

Relative Valuation Methods

1. PE Band

Historical PE percentile analysis:
- Take the past 5 years of PE_TTM time series
- Compute the 10% / 25% / 50% / 75% / 90% percentiles
- Judge overvaluation / undervaluation from the current PE percentile

| Percentile | PE | Implied Price | Interpretation |
|------|-----|---------|------|
| 90% | 35x | 52.5 | Severely overvalued |
| 75% | 28x | 42.0 | Rich |
| 50% | 22x | 33.0 | Fair |
| 25% | 16x | 24.0 | Cheap |
| 10% | 12x | 18.0 | Severely undervalued |
| Current | 18x | 27.0 | Cheap (30th percentile) |

2. PB-ROE Matrix

Theoretical relationship: PB = (ROE - g) / (Ke - g)
Practical use: plot companies in the industry on a PB vs ROE scatter chart

| Quadrant | PB | ROE | Interpretation |
|------|-----|-----|------|
| Lower right | Low PB | High ROE | Undervalued (best buy zone) |
| Upper right | High PB | High ROE | Fair (quality premium) |
| Lower left | Low PB | Low ROE | Value trap or distressed turnaround |
| Upper left | High PB | Low ROE | Overvalued (avoid) |

3. EV/EBITDA

EV = market cap + net debt (interest-bearing debt - cash)
EBITDA = operating profit + depreciation + amortization

Advantages:
- Removes capital-structure differences (vs PE)
- Removes depreciation-policy differences
- Suitable for asset-heavy industries (telecom / energy / infrastructure)

Reference EV/EBITDA ranges by China A-share industry:
| Industry | Median | Undervalued | Overvalued |
|------|--------|------|------|
| Consumer | 15-20x | <12x | >25x |
| Technology | 12-18x | <10x | >22x |
| Energy | 6-10x | <5x | >12x |
| Utilities | 8-12x | <6x | >15x |

Valuation-Trap Detection

Top 10 Valuation Traps

#	Trap	Detection Method	Typical Example
1	Low-PE cyclical at the peak	PE is lowest when earnings are highest and about to fall	Coal at 5x PE in 2021 was the top
2	High-PE growth can be justified	PEG < 1 means the growth rate supports the valuation	30x PE + 40% growth = PEG 0.75
3	Low-PB value destruction	Sustained ROE < Ke means shareholder value is being destroyed	Long-term loss-making asset-heavy company
4	Goodwill bomb	Goodwill / net assets >30% implies impairment risk	Underperforming acquisition after paying a high premium
5	Accounts-receivable trap	Rising receivables / revenue ratio = poor revenue quality	Government receivables + high customer concentration
6	Capitalization trap	Capitalizing R&D / interest flatters profit	PE doubles after true expensing
7	One-off gains	Large gap between recurring net profit and reported net profit	Asset sales / government subsidies boost earnings
8	Share dilution	Stock options / convertible bonds reduce EPS	PE should be based on diluted EPS
9	Related-party transactions	Buy cheap from related parties / sell high to them	Profit shifted outside the listed entity
10	FX swings	High overseas-revenue share means large currency sensitivity	RMB appreciation erodes exporter profits

Analysis Framework

Valuation-Method Selection Decision Tree

What type of company is it?
├── Mature and stable (consumer / utilities / banks)
│   ├── High dividend -> DDM
│   └── Low dividend -> DCF + PE Band
├── High growth (tech / pharma / new energy)
│   └── DCF (high-growth phase) + PEG + PS
├── Cyclical (coal / steel / nonferrous)
│   └── PB + EV/EBITDA (avoid PE)
├── Diversified conglomerate
│   └── SOTP
└── Loss-making company
    └── PS (price-to-sales) + EV/Sales

Cross-Validation

Use at least 2 valuation methods and take the middle value:
1. DCF -> intrinsic value
2. Comparable PE -> market pricing
3. If the difference >30% -> check whether assumptions are reasonable

Output Format

## Valuation Analysis: [Company Name / Code]

### Valuation Summary
| Method | Per-Share Value | Weight | Notes |
|------|---------|------|------|
| DCF | ¥32.5 | 50% | WACC=10%, g=2.5% |
| Comparable PE | ¥28.0 | 30% | Industry average 22x, EPS=1.27 |
| PB-ROE | ¥30.0 | 20% | Fair PB=2.5x |
| **Composite Target Price** | **¥30.8** | | Current price 25.0, upside +23% |

### Sensitivity Analysis
[WACC vs growth-rate matrix]

### Valuation-Trap Check
- [x] Is PE a falsely low cyclical peak? -> No
- [x] Goodwill / net asset ratio -> 12%, safe
- [x] Receivables / revenue trend -> Stable, not deteriorating
- [ ] Gap in recurring net profit -> 15% difference, subsidy dependence worth attention

### Investment Rating: Buy
Target price ¥30.8, current price ¥25.0, upside 23%

Notes

1. DCF is highly sensitive to assumptions: a 1% change in WACC can move valuation by 20%+, so sensitivity analysis is mandatory
2. Comparable companies must truly be comparable: same industry + same scale + same stage; do not apply leader PE multiples to small companies
3. China A-share valuation system is unique: shell value / liquidity premium / policy premium mean US-equity standards cannot be copied directly
4. Valuation is not a target price: markets can remain irrational for a long time, and valuation is an anchor, not a trading signal
5. Special handling for cyclicals: use normalized earnings (mid-cycle earnings), not current earnings
6. Not suitable for cryptocurrencies: traditional valuation frameworks do not apply to BTC / ETH; use on-chain metrics instead (see onchain-analysis)