Menu
Grill me about specs for the workflows I want to build, within this workspace.
Instalar com Codex ou Claude Copie este prompt, cole no Codex, Claude ou outro assistente e deixe que ele revise a página da skill e instale para você.
Baseado na classificação ocupacional SOC
| name | loop-me |
| author | mattpocock |
| upstream | mattpocock/skills |
| upstreamPath | skills/in-progress/loop-me |
| upstreamSha | e9fcdf95b402d360f90f1db8d776d5dd450f9234 |
| lastUpdated | 2026-07-02T01:06:55.000Z |
| tags | ["Planning","Productivity","Matt Pocock"] |
| description | Grill me about specs for the workflows I want to build, within this workspace. |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
| argument-hint | A workflow to design, or nothing to go find one |
Run a stateful /grilling session whose only output is workflow specs. Use the grilling discipline — relentless, one question at a time, a recommended answer attached to each — aimed at the vocabulary and goal below. Create, edit, and delete specs as the grilling resolves things.
A loop is a recurring pattern in the user's life: their career, their week, their morning, a single repeated activity. Picturing a life as loops within loops reveals how predictable its activities really are — which is what makes them worth delegating. Use the lens to find loops worth specifying, and propose ones the user hasn't noticed.
A workflow is the spec of one loop, made real. You run a workflow on a loop — the loop is its running instantiation. Workflows live in workflows/*.md and are the source of truth.
A shared language, reached for only when a workflow calls for it — never a checklist. Mandate nothing structural: a workflow needs no AI, no checkpoint, and no schedule unless the grilling shows it does.
A workflow spec is done when an implementer agent could build it without asking a single question. Grill until then; nothing is done while a question remains.
workflows/*.md — one spec per workflow.NOTES.md — raw notes on the user's world: the tools they use, the channels they process, and their own terminology for both. When it is empty or thin, interview them about their world before specifying anything. Sharpen fuzzy terms into canonical ones as they surface, and record them here.Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.
Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/PRD asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".
Shared vocabulary for designing deep modules. Use when the user wants to design or improve a module's interface, find deepening opportunities, decide where a seam goes, make code more testable or AI-navigable, or when another skill needs the deep-module vocabulary.
Disciplined diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Reproduce → minimise → hypothesise → instrument → fix → regression-test. Use when user says 'diagnose this' / 'debug this', reports a bug, says something is broken/throwing/failing, or describes a performance regression.
Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Use when the user says "diagnose"/"debug this", or reports something broken/throwing/failing/slow.
Build and sharpen a project's domain model. Use when the user wants to pin down domain terminology or a ubiquitous language, record an architectural decision, or when another skill needs to maintain the domain model.