ix-understand

## Flag parsing Parse `$ARGUMENTS` before doing anything else: - The first non-flag token is `TARGET` (may be empty — means whole repo) - `--shallow`: orient only, no agents (default if no flag given) - `--medium`: single agent regardless of system count - `--deep`: full parallel agent strategy - `--save [path]`: if present, set `SAVE_PATH`; path is optional — if absent, auto-generate `ix-understand-<target-slug>.md` in cwd (target slug = `TARGET` with spaces and slashes replaced by `-`, or `repo` if TARGET is empty); if `--save` is not given at all, `SAVE_PATH` is empty. **MANDATORY for `--medium` and `--deep`: This skill MUST use the Agent tool (subagent_type: "ix-memory:ix-system-explorer") for all exploration work. Do NOT call ix tools yourself except for the Phase 1 orient calls below. All subsystem exploration MUST be delegated to agents.** ## Phase 1 — Orient Call these tools **in parallel** to discover the architecture: - `ix_subsystems` with `{}` - `ix_rank` with `{ "by": "dependents", "kind": "class", "top": 15 }` - `ix_rank` with `{ "by": "callers", "kind": "function", "top": 15 }` - `ix_stats` with `{}` From the results, identify: - All top-level systems (names, file counts, cohesion, coupling scores) - The top 10–15 structurally important classes and functions - Total codebase scale (files, nodes, edges) If `TARGET` is set, scope the orient to that target's subsystems. **Confidence check:** Scan `confidence` scores in the `ix_subsystems` results: - Any system with `confidence < 0.5`: add this caveat to the final output header: `⚠ Graph boundary confidence is low for [system] (${confidence}). Structural claims for this region may not reflect actual file relationships.` - Any system with `confidence < 0.3`: report fuzzy boundary as an explicit finding. Label **all** structural claims for that region as `[uncertain]`. ## Depth routing Choose the path based on the parsed depth flag: ### --shallow (default) Synthesize from Phase 1 data only — no agents. Produce: ``` # [TARGET or "Whole Repo"] — System Overview **Scale:** [files, nodes, edges — from ix_stats] ## Subsystem Map | Subsystem | Files | Cohesion | Coupling | Role | |-----------|-------|----------|----------|------| [one row per subsystem from ix_subsystems] ## Top Classes (by dependents) [top 10 from ix_rank results] ## Top Functions (by callers) [top 10 from ix_rank results] ## Quick Assessment [1–2 sentences on overall shape and structural health based on the metrics] ``` Then stop. Suggest deeper options at the bottom: > For a single-agent summary: `/ix-understand [target] --medium` > For full parallel analysis: `/ix-understand [target] --deep` ### --medium Launch a **single** `ix-memory:ix-system-explorer` agent regardless of system count. Do not proceed to Phase 2. Pass: > Build an architectural mental model of: $TARGET (or the whole repo if no target) > > **Orient data (pre-computed):** > [Paste Phase 1 results — subsystem list, top components, stats] > > **Skip Step 1** — orient data is provided. Start from Step 2. > > **Depth:** Cover all major subsystems at one level of depth each. Prioritize breadth over depth — no need to drill into internals of every component. > > **Label every claim as [graph] or [inferred].** Present the agent's output directly to the user. Do not proceed to Phase 2. ### --deep Continue to Phase 2. ## Phase 2 — Decide: serial or parallel (--deep only) Count the number of **significant top-level systems** (file count >= 10 or confidence >= 0.5). - **≤ 3 significant systems**: Launch a **single** `ix-system-explorer` agent with the full prompt (Phase 3A). - **> 3 significant systems**: Launch **parallel** `ix-system-explorer` agents, one per system (Phase 3B). ## Phase 3A — Single agent (--deep, small codebase) **You MUST use the Agent tool** with `subagent_type: "ix-memory:ix-system-explorer"` here. Do NOT do this work yourself. Launch one agent with: > Build a **detailed** architectural mental model of: $TARGET > > If no target is specified, explore the whole repo. > > **Orient data (pre-computed):** > [Paste the orient results from Phase 1 — subsystem list, top components, stats] > > **Skip Step 1** — orient data is provided above. Start from Step 2. > > **Depth expectations:** Comprehensive architectural document for onboarding. Go wide AND deep. Enumerate all major subsystems. For important ones, drill into internal structure. > > **What to cover:** subsystem internals, type system, data flows (ASCII diagrams), key components (up to 15), build/test infra, coupling, risks (security/complexity/data integrity), navigation shortcuts, where to go deeper. > > **Label every claim as [graph] or [inferred]. Use tables and ASCII diagrams.** Then present the agent's output directly to the user. ## Phase 3B — Parallel agents (--deep, large codebase) **You MUST use the Agent tool** with `subagent_type: "ix-memory:ix-system-explorer"` for each system. Launch **ALL agents in a single message** (this runs them in parallel). You must wait for all agents to return before proceeding to Phase 4. Each agent gets: > Explore the **$SYSTEM_NAME** subsystem in detail. > > **Orient data (pre-computed):** > [Paste the full orient results so each agent has global context] > > **Skip Step 1** — orient data is provided. Start from Step 2 scoped to **$SYSTEM_NAME**. > > **What to produce:** > 1. What $SYSTEM_NAME does — purpose, path, file count, role in the architecture > 2. Internal structure — sub-components table (name, path, kind, role) > 3. Key types and abstractions within this system > 4. Top 3–5 most important components (with `ix_explain`) — role, dependents, callers > 5. Primary data flow within this system (ASCII diagram if applicable) > 6. External coupling — which OTHER systems does this one connect to and how? > 7. Risk areas specific to this system > 8. 1–2 `ix_read` calls only if the graph left key patterns unclear > > **Output format:** > ``` > ## $SYSTEM_NAME (path) > > **Purpose:** [one sentence] > **Scale:** [file count, key entity counts] > > ### Internal Structure > | Component | Kind | Role | > |-----------|------|------| > > ### Key Components > | Component | Location | Role | Dependents | Risk | > |-----------|----------|------|------------|------| > > ### Data Flow > [ASCII diagram if applicable] > > ### External Coupling > [Which systems it connects to, edge counts, coupling direction] > > ### Risks > [Specific risks with file paths] > ``` > > **Label every claim as [graph] or [inferred].** Include one additional **ix-system-explorer** agent in the same single message for **cross-cutting concerns**: > Analyze **cross-system structure** for this codebase. > > **Orient data (pre-computed):** > [Paste orient results] > > Using the graph tools, determine: > 1. **Core type system / data model** — what are the fundamental types shared across systems? Call `ix_rank` with `{ "by": "dependents", "kind": "class", "top": 15 }` and `ix_explain` on the top 5. > 2. **Primary data flows** — trace 1–3 key execution paths end-to-end across system boundaries using `ix_trace`. Produce ASCII diagrams. > 3. **Build & development infrastructure** — call `ix_inventory` with `{ "kind": "file", "path": "test" }` and `ix_inventory` with `{ "kind": "file", "path": "cmd" }`. > 4. **Cross-system coupling hotspots** — which system pairs have the most edges between them? > 5. **Navigation shortcuts** — "To find X, look at Y" table for common tasks. > 6. **Where to go deeper** — specific ix tools for follow-up. > > **Label every claim as [graph] or [inferred].** ## Phase 4 — Synthesize (--deep only) **Do NOT proceed until ALL agents from Phase 3 have returned.** Once all agents complete, **you** (not an agent) assemble the final document: ``` # System: [name or "Whole Repo"] ## Overview [What the system is and does — purpose, language, scale. Sourced from orient data.] ## Architecture ### System Map [Table of ALL top-level systems with file counts, cohesion, coupling, roles — from orient data] [Insert each subsystem agent's output as its own ### section] ## Core Abstractions / Type System [From cross-cutting agent] ## Data Flows [From cross-cutting agent — ASCII diagrams showing end-to-end paths across systems] ## Key Components [Merged table from all subsystem agents, sorted by dependents descending, top 15] | Component | System | Location | Role | Dependents | Risk | |-----------|--------|----------|------|------------|------| ## Build & Development Infrastructure [From cross-cutting agent] ## Dependencies & Coupling [From cross-cutting agent — cross-system coupling hotspots + external deps] ## Risk Areas ### Security Risks [Merged from all agents] ### Complexity Risks [Merged from all agents] ### Data Integrity Risks [Merged from all agents] ## Navigation Shortcuts [From cross-cutting agent] | To find... | Look at... | |------------|-----------| ## Where to Go Deeper [From cross-cutting agent] ## Selective Reference [Top 15–20 most important entities across all systems — merged and deduplicated] ``` **Quality bar:** The final document must be comprehensive (all systems covered), specific (file paths, counts), structured (tables, ASCII diagrams), actionable (navigation shortcuts), and evidenced ([graph] or [inferred] labels). ## Save step **Only if `SAVE_PATH` is non-empty (i.e., `--save` was passed):** - Write the full output above to `SAVE_PATH`. - Confirm to the user: `Saved to <SAVE_PATH>`. - Do not write the file if `--save` was not passed.