decide-what-is-worth-watching

# Decide what is worth watching ## What it does Picks with the process owner which steps matter enough to watch and which do not, and says in words a person can check what a followed step and a departed one look like in the data. ## Where it happens The agent does this in two activities across one reference process. Each one names the activity as that process words it. - **Pick the Steps Worth Watching** - `ref/rev/instrument-a-process`, activity 2 - [Instrument a Process](../../../../processes/revenue-operations/instrument-a-process.md) - **Say What Departure Looks Like** - `ref/rev/instrument-a-process`, activity 3 - [Instrument a Process](../../../../processes/revenue-operations/instrument-a-process.md) ## What to record Per process: the watched steps, and the unwatched ones with the reason each was left out. For each watched step, the observable difference between a followed run and a departed one. The change request field by field, saying what each new field records about a person, and the policy check with the line behind every refusal and the fields the privacy reviewer struck out. The baseline, and the detection's score against the known runs with every miss and every false alarm listed. Every signal raised in the first weeks, checked by hand against the run it fired on. The steps it still cannot see. Per period: the measure's gaps and outages marked before a number is read, the ranked departures with the count behind each rate, and what people said, attributed to a role, with the refusals counted as refusals. That contract covers every activity this abstract agent takes on, and it is repeated in `com.agentcatalog.agent/RECORDS.md`. What the abstract agent does not do is in `com.agentcatalog.agent/NOT.md`.