structuring-first-lien-last-out-facilities

name	structuring-first-lien-last-out-facilities
description	Designs FILO structures with tranche-level pricing, distribution waterfalls, and intercreditor provisions within unitranche financing. Use when structuring FILO tranches, analyzing split economics, or designing blended pricing.
tags	["credit-and-institutional-lending","credit"]
metadata	{"author":"casemark","practice_areas":["Credit Markets","Leveraged Lending","Direct Lending"],"document_types":["Report"],"skill_modes":["Analysis"]}

Structuring First Lien Last Out Facilities

Designs FILO structures with tranche-level pricing, distribution waterfalls, and intercreditor provisions within unitranche financing.

When To Use

• Structuring a unitranche facility that splits into first-out (FO) and last-out (LO) tranches with differentiated economics
• Analyzing blended yield versus tranche-level pricing to determine FILO feasibility against a traditional first lien / second lien stack
• Designing or reviewing the Agreement Among Lenders (AAL) governing FO/LO intercreditor rights
• Evaluating FILO economics for a direct lender syndicating the FO piece to a bank or other lower-cost capital provider
• Modeling distribution waterfalls, default interest allocation, and recovery scenarios across tranches

Inputs To Gather

• Deal parameters: Total facility size, FO/LO split (dollar amounts and percentages), maturity, amortization schedule
• Pricing terms: FO coupon (spread + floor), LO coupon (spread + floor), OID on each tranche, any PIK toggle or PIK component on the LO
• Blended yield target: Weighted-average cost the borrower sees as a single unitranche rate
• Credit metrics: Borrower EBITDA, total leverage, FO leverage, LO leverage, fixed charge coverage ratio
• Intercreditor provisions: Voting thresholds for amendments/waivers, standstill periods, purchase option triggers, buyout pricing mechanics
• Waterfall mechanics: Order of payments (interest, principal, fees), default interest allocation, excess cash flow sweep split
• Recovery assumptions: Collateral value estimates, expected recovery rates by tranche under stress scenarios
• Market context: Comparable FILO transactions, current spread benchmarks for FO (bank market) and LO (direct lending market)

Workflow

1. Define the tranche architecture

   • Set FO and LO commitment amounts as a percentage of total facility size
   • Determine whether the LO tranche carries a PIK component, cash-pay coupon, or blended structure
   • Confirm maturity alignment — typically co-terminus, but flag any maturity mismatch risk

2. Build blended pricing analysis

   • Calculate the blended all-in yield the borrower pays across FO and LO tranches
   • Compare blended cost against alternatives: traditional first lien/second lien, standalone unitranche, or syndicated TLB
   • Model OID amortization and upfront fee impact on effective yield for each tranche holder

3. Structure the distribution waterfall

   • Define payment priority: FO interest → LO interest → FO scheduled amortization → LO scheduled amortization → excess cash flow sweep allocation
   • Specify default interest treatment — whether it flows pro rata or is allocated entirely to FO
   • Address make-whole and prepayment premium allocation between tranches
   • Model the waterfall under base case, downside, and default scenarios

4. Draft intercreditor provisions (AAL terms)

   • Voting rights: Identify which amendments require unanimous consent versus FO-only or LO-only consent [VERIFY — AAL terms are deal-specific and heavily negotiated]
   • Standstill period: Specify duration during which LO lenders cannot exercise remedies after an event of default (typically 90–180 days)
   • Purchase option: Define the LO lender's right to purchase FO claims at par (or par plus accrued) upon a default trigger
   • Buyout mechanics: Set pricing for the buyout option — par, par plus accrued, or a premium
   • Release and DIP provisions: Address how FO and LO rights interact in a bankruptcy filing, including DIP financing consent and collateral release

5. Run recovery and stress analysis

   • Model collateral recovery at multiple enterprise value haircuts (e.g., 20%, 40%, 60% decline)
   • Calculate recovery rates for FO and LO tranches separately under each scenario
   • Determine the enterprise value breakpoint at which LO recovery drops below a target threshold
   • Assess whether FO sizing provides adequate cushion under stress

6. Benchmark against market

   • Compare FO spread to bank-market first lien spreads for similar credit profiles

Output

• FILO Structure Summary: Tranche sizes, pricing (coupon, OID, PIK if applicable), blended all-in yield, and key dates
• Waterfall Exhibit: Step-by-step payment cascade under performing, stressed, and default scenarios with dollar allocations to each tranche
• Intercreditor Term Sheet: AAL provisions covering voting, standstill, purchase option, buyout pricing, and bankruptcy-related rights
• Recovery Analysis Table: FO and LO recovery percentages at multiple enterprise value haircut levels
• Blended Pricing Comparison: Side-by-side analysis of FILO blended cost versus alternative capital structures
• Key Risk Flags: Identified issues such as thin LO cushion, aggressive standstill periods, or blended yield above market

Quality Checks

• Blended yield calculation reconciles exactly to the weighted average of FO and LO all-in costs
• Waterfall allocations sum to total available cash in each scenario — no leakage or rounding gaps
• Intercreditor provisions are internally consistent (e.g., standstill period length aligns with purchase option trigger timeline)
• Recovery analysis uses collateral values consistent with the deal's appraisal or enterprise valuation basis
• FO leverage and LO leverage correctly map to the borrower's capital structure and priority of claims
• All jurisdiction-dependent provisions (UCC perfection, intercreditor enforceability) are marked [VERIFY]
• PIK accrual mechanics, if applicable, are modeled through maturity with compounding correctly applied