Skip to main content

circle-of-competence

Define and operate within your areas of genuine expertise to avoid costly mistakes from overconfidence

Ir para a instalação

Informações da origem

Repositório
lev-os/agents
Última atividade na origem
7 de março de 2026 às 00:14
Idioma detectado do SKILL.md
inglês
Estrelas
21
Forks
2

Opções de instalação

Por padrão, está selecionado o prompt que primeiro revisa a origem. Você pode mudar para um comando direto ou baixar uma cópia local.

Revise os arquivos de origem

Leia o SKILL.md e os arquivos complementares exibidos pelo SkillsMP antes de decidir se vai instalar.

Exibindo SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instruções da origem · Visualização somente leitura
name
circle-of-competence
description
Define and operate within your areas of genuine expertise to avoid costly mistakes from overconfidence
# Circle of Competence ## Overview Circle of Competence is Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger's mental model for limiting decisions to areas where you have genuine understanding and expertise. The core insight: knowing the boundaries of your competence is more important than the size of that competence. Operating outside your circle leads to predictable failures because confidence diminishes slower than competence as you cross the perimeter. ## When to Use - Evaluating investment opportunities or business decisions - Deciding whether to enter a new market or domain - Assessing whether you understand a problem well enough to make a decision - Choosing between expanding your expertise vs. staying focused - Avoiding disasters from overconfidence in unfamiliar areas ## The Process ### Step 1: Map Your Current Circle List domains where you have genuine expertise - not interest, but deep understanding. Ask: Can you explain how this business/domain makes money? Can you predict second-order effects? Can you identify what separates good from great performers? **Example:** An enterprise SaaS engineer might list: cloud infrastructure, API design, database optimization, but NOT consumer mobile apps or hardware. ### Step 2: Apply the Three-Box Framework For every opportunity, categorize it: "In" (within circle), "Out" (clearly outside), or "Too Hard" (uncertain). Charlie Munger: "You don't have to be a jack-of-all-trades." Most opportunities should land in "Out" or "Too Hard" - that's healthy selectivity. ### Step 3: Test Your Boundaries with Questions Before committing, ask: Can I read this company's earnings report and form independent questions? Can I isolate where this sits among competitors? Can I explain edge cases and failure modes? If you're guessing or parroting others, you're outside your circle. ### Step 4: Know When Confidence Exceeds Competence As you approach your circle's edge, confidence doesn't drop as fast as competence - this is the danger zone. Watch for rationalization ("I can figure this out"), unfounded optimism, or reliance on others' expertise. These signal you're crossing the boundary. ### Step 5: Wait Rather Than Expand Hastily When facing an attractive opportunity outside your circle, resist the urge to expand. Buffett: "If we can't find things within our circle of competence, we won't expand the circle. We'll wait." Deliberate expansion takes years; hasty expansion invites disaster. ### Step 6: Expand Through Deep Study, Not Opportunism Only expand your circle through sustained, focused study - not because an opportunity appeared. Spend years reading, practicing, and learning from mistakes in a new domain before considering it "inside" your circle. ## Example Application **Situation:** Buffett was approached about investing in tech companies during the dot-com boom (1999-2000). Everyone was making fortunes; pressure to participate was immense. **Application:** He categorized technology as "Too Hard" - he couldn't predict which companies would win or explain their competitive moats. Despite ridicule for "missing out," he stuck to businesses he understood: insurance, banking, consumer brands. **Outcome:** He avoided $5 trillion in losses when the bubble burst (2000-2002), while his "boring" holdings remained stable. His discipline to say "I don't know" preserved billions in capital. ## Anti-Patterns - Expanding your circle because an opportunity looks attractive (opportunity-driven vs. competence-driven) - Confusing interest or enthusiasm with genuine expertise - Relying on others' analysis rather than your own independent understanding - Overestimating your circle's size due to past success in related areas - Failing to acknowledge "Too Hard" category - forcing everything into In/Out binary ## Related - second-order-thinking - inversion - mungers-latticework-approach - margin-of-safety
Ver no GitHub